Picture this, you jump off a cliff-side in a car in full 3D with depth perception. Do you understand? You'll get vertigo just looking at it, that's awesome.LordNue said:So no, it adds nothing to a game. It is just HEY LOOK SHINY NEW GADGET TO PLAY WITH. Thank you for actually answering my question. I will politely disagree with you on the difference between 3D and non 3D being the same as PS2 and PS3 however.Simalacrum said:People like 3D because its 3D. It adds graphical depth to the game, so long as you don't get headaches from it (which, admittedly, some people do get). Having 3D gives a new element to the graphics. Its a bit like the difference between the PS2 and the PS3, graphically speaking. Sure, gameplay wise there may not be any difference with the controllers from the PS2 and the PS3, but hey, prettier graphics!LordNue said:How am I being a fan hater? I'm honestly asking for some explanation here. I want to know what it adds to gaming, I want to know why it's not just a shitty gimmick. Yet all I'm getting is an ad hominem attack which makes me think there's nothing there beyond a bunch of people who just want to hop onto the newest gadget because it's new and shiny.Arachon said:Right, I'm going to stop you right there, you're coming off as a massive Fan Hater [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FanHater] here. I'm not going to force you to like 3D, that's perfectly fine with me, but would you mind leaving this thread to those who are interested in the 3D-gaming concept, and allow us to discuss the topic without being interrupted?LordNue said:My depth perception is fine, you're the one who admitted they can't platform in regular games. But keep on with the ad hominem argument, that'll give you more credibility.
Oh and pro-tip: When something works fine, letting it continue to work fine isn't really a benefit. It's just adding an unnecessary price to do the same thing with a gimmick.
In the same way, people like 3D for the pure and simple reason that its a little bit prettier than 2D due to the sense of depth that it creates. To say that a visual enhancement is a gimmick is like saying that next-gen graphics is a gimmick.
Edit: Wait, isn't calling "ad hominem" an "ad hominem"?