^ this I agree with 100%The Rogue Wolf said:As someone who's done both, I'd say that writing is easier to learn but harder to master. Any idiot can write a handful of sentences- many do- while they'd struggle to get anything better than stick figures and blocks on paper... but when it comes to getting someone to read your writing and envision what it describes, not only events and places but emotions and action, a thousand words (written by a truly skilled author) is worth far more than a picture.
It's not like I lack experience. I've been writing for a decade now, and I can tell what works and what doesn't. Among the hurdles I can't seem to get over is originality. I take a lot of inspiration from works I've enjoyed myself. I build on that, put my own spin on it, but instead of creating something new, it always ends up looking like a crude imitation. I feel like I haven't written anything that's truly mine.GTwander said:Here is an interesting point.excalipoor said:I've drawn stuff I'm pretty happy with before. On the other hand, I hate everything I've ever written.
While I stand by the idea that writing is easier, nothing you produce will be of any merit until years and years of practice + refining of tastes. Drawing is purely aesthetic, but writing is a braintease, and requires a bit more out of it to gain favor.
As an example; I started writing in 6th grade when I was 11, and it was total shit I'd rather forget ever happened. By 16 it started showing a healthy "core", as in, a story people would likely care about at all. Now at 28, I feel my stuff would make Christopher Nolan and Satoshi Kon's ghost green with jealousy. I even go back to my waaaay earlier works and am able to single out what works, versus what is trite and/or amateur.
It really all depends on how you best express yourself. For some writing will be much easier and they can weave a story out of ideas plucked from the ether. Others can take a look around them or even within themselves and lay down a visual masterpiece. There are musicians who can hear the sounds around them and translate that into music, as Hendrix did.Twyce said:snip
There has never been an original thought since the beginning of time, it's always been a basis of observation > imitation. Even the wheel bit the physics of an object rolling down a hill. All that is required is a spark of inspiration and the ability to spend time on it and make it flower.excalipoor said:It's not like I lack experience. I've been writing for a decade now, and I can tell what works and what doesn't. Among the hurdles I can't seem to get over is originality. I take a lot of inspiration from works I've enjoyed myself. I build on that, put my own spin on it, but instead of creating something new, it always ends up looking like a crude imitation. I feel like I haven't written anything that's truly mine.GTwander said:Here is an interesting point.excalipoor said:I've drawn stuff I'm pretty happy with before. On the other hand, I hate everything I've ever written.
While I stand by the idea that writing is easier, nothing you produce will be of any merit until years and years of practice + refining of tastes. Drawing is purely aesthetic, but writing is a braintease, and requires a bit more out of it to gain favor.
As an example; I started writing in 6th grade when I was 11, and it was total shit I'd rather forget ever happened. By 16 it started showing a healthy "core", as in, a story people would likely care about at all. Now at 28, I feel my stuff would make Christopher Nolan and Satoshi Kon's ghost green with jealousy. I even go back to my waaaay earlier works and am able to single out what works, versus what is trite and/or amateur.