which of the mount and blade games is better?

Recommended Videos

TheFrost

New member
Feb 4, 2011
117
0
0
just bought the series over steam for £10. so which should I play first? the original, warband or with fire and sword.
 

NeutralDrow

New member
Mar 23, 2009
9,097
0
0
I'd play the original a bit just to get a feel for it, then switch over to Warband (it's what I did). That's generally the favored one, I've noticed.
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Warband is a lot better than the original. In fact it is the original, but with extra stuff added on.

I haven't played Fire & Sword.
 

TheDist

New member
Mar 29, 2010
200
0
0
I'd go for Warband first, if you play m&b first when you get to warband and fire and sword the controls will feel strange.

Warband is in my opinion the best of the three, but I do like them all. If you are into mods there are some good ones, from small addons to total conversions.
 

demoman_chaos

New member
May 25, 2009
2,254
0
0
Warband is far better than the original, WF&S mainly just adds gunpoweder weapons which kinda ruined it for me.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
Warband is much better than Fire and Sword and the original Mount and Blade. I suggest you start with that and in the future possibly give Fire and Sword a shot.
 

Riobux

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,955
0
0
Warband is a lot better, but that's not to say Fire And Sword hasn't gotten better recently (thanks to various things like being able to be female in campaign).
 

omicron1

New member
Mar 26, 2008
1,729
0
0
Warband is Mount and Blade ++, basically. New features, multiplayer, no real reason to go to M&B vanilla. With Fire and Sword is a bit like a total conversion mod - new map, new characters, new factions; possibly best left until the thrill of the original campaign and setting is all but gone.
 

Svane

New member
Aug 20, 2011
28
0
0
Warband is my personal favorite.

Fire and Sword is quite cool with the newer armour and weapons, the pistols and rifles which is the reason to chose Fire and Sword over Warband.

In Fire and Sword when using Firearms you feel like a unstoppable force of destruction! But if the enemy uses firearms and manage to hit you... you'll feel like the most nerfed person on Earth.
 

Krantos

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,840
0
0
Warband, easily.

Though, tbh, if you get the Native Expansion Mod, original might be a bit better. Warband is basically an updated, more polished version of the original with better textures/animations and an additional faction.

Native Expansion, though, does a great job with the balancing that even Warband kind of fails at.

If you're not going to get Native Expansion, make sure to get the TweakMB mod. It's essentially a simple editing tool that lets you modify some numbers in the game. First thing to do it increase the number of bandits (except Sea Raiders, Steppe and Desert Bandits). Otherwise, the game world quickly becomes barren except for the war parties that you can't take on until much later in the game.

I haven't tried Fire and Steel yet, but the reception it got seems lukewarm at best.
 

MazeMinion

New member
Mar 7, 2010
196
0
0
The original has some cool mods like the Star Wars mod.

Warband is the original with some added stuff.

With Fire & Sword is a cheaper expansion with guns.
 

GraveeKing

New member
Nov 15, 2009
621
0
0
dwarf43 said:
just bought the series over steam for £10. so which should I play first? the original, warband or with fire and sword.
Ok, personally I say - the orginal is good to start out as a noble so go from there. Warband you should then play once you want to try stuff differently, Fire and sword when you want to ruin the series for yourself and realize that being shot in the foot is terrible deadly even with those titanium boots you wear.
In short:
Orginal - GOOD PLAY IT FIRST.
Warband - PLAY IT ALSO
Fire and Sword - Don't even install it unless you love harsh realism of inaccurate guns always missing when you try and ruining a lot of the fun of melee combat!
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Play the original to get a feel for it, then move on to Warband, which is essentially the original but with quite a few sweet additions. Haven't played Fire and Sword yet though.

dwarf43 said:
is there some kind of overlaping story?
Nope. It's completely non-linear and un-scripted.

Honestly, I'd say that the the Mount and Blade games are the purest RPG's I've ever played.
 

Gabanuka

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,372
0
0
Original is pointless with Warband. I personally dont like Fire and Sword because I like a non-fictional setting and I just generally prefer it
 

GameMaNiAC

New member
Sep 8, 2010
599
0
0
I'm going to have to go with everyone else here and say Warband is the best one out of all three.

With Fire & Sword just didn't feel right, wasn't as fun with guns in it.