Bad company 2 came out about 2 years after Cod 4... MW2 and BFBC2 came out almost together with MW2 coming first. Also, some of us enjoy story and multiplayer means very little to us. Just subjective opinion.im-white said:I don't know what rock you have been living under, remind me when COD 4 came out because i swear BF2 came out before that and cod 4's multilayer was pretty much a stolen rehash of bf2 + DOD. If you buy either game for single player you are crazy because neither has the staying power of their mp brethren. if you would rather play Mp then stick to bfbc2 the vast majority of the bugs have been defused and it doesn't have a for sure onslaught of pointless DLC that will come out 3 months down the road for an outrageous cost. On another note you would like to use a rehashed version of COD4, WAW or MW2 engine or an actual engine that will test your system to it's limits i.e the frostbite 1.5 engine. it's your choice ... last thing do you prefer (cluster ASDF) matches or strategical matches)darth jacen said:Get Black Ops. BFBC2 steals so many set pieces from COD4 and MW2 there is no point getting it if you have already beaten COD 4 or MW2. Black Ops is a rather fun game with the most pointed story for a COD game yet. Not as good a story as COD4, but very good. Defiantly worth the 60$ and for sure better than BFBC2.
I hope you're getting BC2 on PC at least. If not, then what the hell?!Jabberwock xeno said:I LOVED the first bad company game (destructible environment FTW!), but I'm not sure if I should get black ops.
Which should I get?
(if Black ops has MW2's 3rd person, then I'll get that, no questions asked.)
EDIT: I have decided to get both, but Now I want to know which to get first.
what were you playing it on? on the pc its still lively and easy to find a nice full serverOmikron009 said:Bad Company 2 is probably a slightly better game, but I'd get Black Ops simply because Bad Company 2 is kind of dead at this point. I tried to play over the weekend and couldn't find a game with more than 4 other people. Not good for a huge team-based game.
I was playing on xbox 360. Come to think of it, the relative emptiness may have been due to the release of Black Ops. Actually, that was almost certainly why.Worgen said:what were you playing it on? on the pc its still lively and easy to find a nice full serverOmikron009 said:Bad Company 2 is probably a slightly better game, but I'd get Black Ops simply because Bad Company 2 is kind of dead at this point. I tried to play over the weekend and couldn't find a game with more than 4 other people. Not good for a huge team-based game.
probably a combination of that and the 360 match making sucking, having a server browser is really handy especially if it lets you queue up for a serverOmikron009 said:I was playing on xbox 360. Come to think of it, the relative emptiness may have been due to the release of Black Ops. Actually, that was almost certainly why.Worgen said:what were you playing it on? on the pc its still lively and easy to find a nice full serverOmikron009 said:Bad Company 2 is probably a slightly better game, but I'd get Black Ops simply because Bad Company 2 is kind of dead at this point. I tried to play over the weekend and couldn't find a game with more than 4 other people. Not good for a huge team-based game.
I hate to bring it to your attention but bf2 stands for battlefield 2 mate and it was released in 2005. oh how sad it is to not play multiple platforms or follow other releases on other platforms...darth jacen said:Bad company 2 came out about 2 years after Cod 4... MW2 and BFBC2 came out almost together with MW2 coming first. Also, some of us enjoy story and multiplayer means very little to us. Just subjective opinion.im-white said:I don't know what rock you have been living under, remind me when COD 4 came out because i swear BF2 came out before that and cod 4's multilayer was pretty much a stolen rehash of bf2 + DOD. If you buy either game for single player you are crazy because neither has the staying power of their mp brethren. if you would rather play Mp then stick to bfbc2 the vast majority of the bugs have been defused and it doesn't have a for sure onslaught of pointless DLC that will come out 3 months down the road for an outrageous cost. On another note you would like to use a rehashed version of COD4, WAW or MW2 engine or an actual engine that will test your system to it's limits i.e the frostbite 1.5 engine. it's your choice ... last thing do you prefer (cluster ASDF) matches or strategical matches)darth jacen said:Get Black Ops. BFBC2 steals so many set pieces from COD4 and MW2 there is no point getting it if you have already beaten COD 4 or MW2. Black Ops is a rather fun game with the most pointed story for a COD game yet. Not as good a story as COD4, but very good. Defiantly worth the 60$ and for sure better than BFBC2.