AC/DC, no contest. I saw them live at Download and it was by far the best gig I've ever been to.
Going to have to second this man here, Beatles and Queen.EscapeGoat said:It's a tie between The Beatles and Queen. Both were masters of the art of music, unafraid to explore, expand and create entirely new genres, both are key inspirations for a host of following genres and bands and both were fronted by incredible vocalists and backed up by extraordinary musicians who ended up creating two of the most awe-inspiring back catalogues this world has ever seen.
'Tis good and catchy, but it's also bland. Doesn't make me think or evoke any emotions, or take me to any new places in my imagination, or anything like that... about the only thing you can really do with it is headbang (or, as you say, "swagger"). There is a time and a place, but it doesn't come close push any of my real "love" buttons.MelasZepheos said:
If I'm being a little less judgemental it's a simple case of different strokes for different folks. Pink Floyd have always sounded incredibly pretentious to me, and often it feels to me like they're doing things just for the sake of doing them instead of for the sake of the music. After I started to play the guitar as well I just grew to really hate the amount of plugging they got from everyone saying they were good and that I should learn their songs.xTc212 said:Going by your comment you have in my opinion good taste in music, can I ask why you hate Pink Floyd so much?MelasZepheos said:xTc212 said:Pink FloydOhJohnNo said:Pink Floyd.Mr Fixit said:Pink FloydYosharian said:Pink Floyd, yes that's what I was thinking.Flamezdudes said:Pink Floyd of course.
Heh, so do I. Funny that. Yes are one of my favourite bands. Still can't stand the way punk killed the genre off (my feelings towards the Sex Pistols roughly mirror your own towards Floyd).MelasZepheos said:(I hold them almost personally resonsible for prog rock)
Absolutely, it doesn't actually connect with me in any way when I listen to it.OhJohnNo said:'Tis good and catchy, but it's also bland. Doesn't make me think or evoke any emotions, or take me to any new places in my imagination, or anything like that... about the only thing you can really do with it is headbang (or, as you say, "swagger"). There is a time and a place, but it doesn't come close push any of my real "love" buttons.MelasZepheos said:
.
I disagree with you there, but I can't really lay any base to support my opinion. I think it's a matter of taste and can't really be argued.MelasZepheos said:Pink Floyd have always sounded incredibly pretentious to me, and often it feels to me like they're doing things just for the sake of doing them instead of for the sake of the music.
Which band is composed entirely of sentient, purple jellyfish?anthony87 said:Rush.
Because the answer to any band/music related question is always Rush.
[HEADING=1]always[/HEADING]
A good rule of thumb for me goes as follows:V3rtig0 said:I disagree with you there, but I can't really lay any base to support my opinion. I think it's a matter of taste and can't really be argued.MelasZepheos said:Pink Floyd have always sounded incredibly pretentious to me, and often it feels to me like they're doing things just for the sake of doing them instead of for the sake of the music.
But if you think they're doing things "just for the sake of doing them", do you by chance hate bands like Gentle Giant or Van der Graaf Generator? They also do things to add complexity to their songs, which are pretty damn complex even by prog rock standards.