It's more of a statement than an opinion. I just thought that compared to fiction writers, non-fiction writers appear to have a lack of imagination since they write about thinks that have already happened & their source & subject material is already laid out for them in history.Your.Name.Here post=18.74520.838773 said:If it's not your opinion then who's is it?Jamash post=18.74520.838757 said:Answer: Their lack of imagination? (not my opinion, just saying...)Your.Name.Here post=18.74520.838679 said:Question: why can't non-fiction writers be considered good?
For example, it would be much easier to write a book about World War 2 than a book about a fictional war, where you would have to invent the characters, sides, nations, politics, battles, weaponry etc.
Of course I don't necessarily believe that non-fiction writers have a lack of imagination, it can be shown in their creative use of language & metaphors when recounting the facts.
I suppose I was playing Devil's Advocate in a way & presenting a reason why a non-fiction writer may not be considered to be the best author of our era.