It's not very popular among a lot of chemists I know (my old man being one possible exception)... Hell, I don't like it, but I know a good thing when I see it (or at least, I hope so) and recognise just how important his work was/is.Alucard 11189 said:I had to study some of his work as part of a spectroscopy module I was studying actually. I must admit he does deserve the accolades he was given. Most of my friends though would have happily killed him if he wasn't already dead. Physical chemistry in general is not very popular among the biochemists I know.
In my experience he is quite popular, but then again, I know a lot of physical chemists who are big fans of his work. I can recognize that he was a great talent to his field, and while you might hate soemone's work when you have to study it, you can recognize how easy it makes your job when you are older and wiser.SckizoBoy said:It's not very popular among a lot of chemists I know (my old man being one possible exception)... Hell, I don't like it, but I know a good thing when I see it (or at least, I hope so) and recognise just how important his work was/is.Alucard 11189 said:I had to study some of his work as part of a spectroscopy module I was studying actually. I must admit he does deserve the accolades he was given. Most of my friends though would have happily killed him if he wasn't already dead. Physical chemistry in general is not very popular among the biochemists I know.
I don't know that many physical chemists, but that's beside the point. Still, when he's nicknamed 'the father of molecular spectroscopy' the physchem-ers will look up to him... and generally with good reason.Alucard 11189 said:In my experience he is quite popular, but I know a lot of physical chemists who are big fans of his work.
I have always had a healthy respect for Krishnasami Venkataraman myself. I have never heard of Jabir Ibn Hayyaan, I will go and look him up to rectify this.SckizoBoy said:I don't know that many physical chemists, but that's beside the point. Still, when he's nicknamed 'the father of molecular spectroscopy' the physchem-ers will look up to him... and generally with good reason.Alucard 11189 said:In my experience he is quite popular, but I know a lot of physical chemists who are big fans of his work.
For organic chemistry, sure the technology back then was rubbish, but all the more reason to respect his skill: Jabir Ibn Hayyaan, the father of laboratory chemistry (even if he didn't know it at the time).
AGAIN!?SckizoBoy said:...Alucard 11189 said:Vincent D'Onofrio.
Oh, wow... never would've guessed...(!)
OT: Once again (double posted thread but what the hell...) Prince Rupert, the Count Palatinate. A genuine polymath and all round genius.
Oh, he was the one that the Baker-Venkataraman reaction you did for your res-proj was named after. Cool...Alucard 11189 said:I have always had a healthy respect for Krishnasami Venkataraman myself. I have never heard of Jabir Ibn Hayyaan, I will go and look him up to rectify this.
*meh* Don't sweat it, I triple posted a couple times because it wouldn't load... (though to be fair, where I live, the broadband sucks... and I mean really sucks...)Sizzle Montyjing said:AGAIN!?
I even checked to make sure that i hadn't double posted.
But i just guess my computer loves screwing with me.
Honestly it makes me double post at any chance it gets.
He's genius, smexy, insane....need i say more?Sizzle Montyjing said:I think we'll get along swimmingly.Nautical Honors Society said:Nigel Thornberry,
I want his nose someday.
Yes you do.Skullkid4187 said:Howard Hughes. I don't need to explain myself.
EXPLAIN YOURSELF!
Tim's awesome. His Song For Phil Daoust is always a must-listen when we get a bad review.Mr Thin said:Tim Minchin, the man in my avatar.
Agreed it's like choosing between ice cream and cake. Both are great in their own ways, tremendous together and it comes down to preference. They are both incredibly awesomelatenightapplepie said:The Rockerfly said:Hugh Laurie![]()
I actually prefer Stephen Fry of the two. But both are truly brilliant gentlemen.
On topic: Yeah, probably Stephen Fry.
A genius, and a scholar among men. Carlin is still one of the people I look up to more than anything.Yarpie said:George Carlin.
Such a sharp observer and such a command of the English language when expressing his views. Oh, and possibly the funniest man who ever lived.