When reading, I don't really hear a voice, though if it was a recognizable thing, I think it'd be my own voice.
If my life was narrated. It'd be a three-man job depending on my situation. The 'day-time adventure' VoiceOver work, for when breaking from routine, would be Stephen Fry. The alternative 'night-time adventure' voiceover would be covered by Alan Rickman, and to finish it all off, the everyday routine parts of my life would be lightened by the master: Morgan Freeman.
I'd like to see anyone beat that combination!
If my life was narrated. It'd be a three-man job depending on my situation. The 'day-time adventure' VoiceOver work, for when breaking from routine, would be Stephen Fry. The alternative 'night-time adventure' voiceover would be covered by Alan Rickman, and to finish it all off, the everyday routine parts of my life would be lightened by the master: Morgan Freeman.
I'd like to see anyone beat that combination!
Id (Witchking), Ego (John), and Super-Ego (Gandalf) [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Id,_ego,_and_super-ego] much?Mimsofthedawg said:When I read books, I often hear either Liam Neeson or Bilbo from LOTR reading to me.Xombiebubble said:Wassup. quick question. When you read text or go over something in your head, what kind of voice do you hear? is it your voice, a celebrity voice, or just something really epic?
personally, my Narrator is Ron Perlman. Dude has a great speaking voice, makes for epic storytelling.
[edit]
also, iffin your life was to be made into an epic story, who would narrate. First person, third person, doesn't matter
When I'm making big decisions, I hear several people present different sides of the arguments such as: the WitchKing (LOTR), Gandalf (LOTR), and John Adams (HBO Series Special).
None of them represent any particular side of the issue. witchking and Gandalf are usually the opposites of a particular argument (witchking is usually anger/frustration and Gandalf is compassion and focus) meanwhile John Adams is a mediator of sorts, someone who listens to the extreme arguments of either side and bring the discussion to a more logical stance.