It's my understanding that minors can purchase M rated games provided their parents are there with them. Seems pretty fair to me, so I don't see what's so much better about UK's system.Eggsnham said:Ah, how did I miss demon's souls? It seems like such a good game. In any case, I should clarify, I don't play only "M" games, I just think that limiting these games to people under 17 is stupid; we should have a rating system like the UK's, it's more specific to parents and doesn't promote the thinking of "only a couple more years!" That many people have come to adopt for various reasons in American society. However, I do like games that aren't rated "M", there are many that are great fun and worth every cent. I like to play both MW2 and Ratchet and Clank, two amazing games that are at polar opposites in terms of ratings.
I only suggested that because anyone who thinks that most good games are rated M is obviously ignoring a lot of other good games from another genres. I mean, take RPGs for example. Aside from Bethesda games and post-2005 Bioware games most RPGs are in the E-T range.Eggsnham said:I like shooters, I like RPG's, I like RTS' etc. etc. I don't need to branch out.
That's fine that you were over-generalizing a bit, but just realize that other people are going to see bias when you make a statement like that. It's a bit like if someone were to make a post asking "Why do all good games have amazing graphics?" or "Why are all good games RPGs?".Eggsnham said:I did claim that only good games were rated "M", what I meant to say was along the lines of "Many good games are rated "M"."
Explaining to you and others why a game is great is purely a matter of opinion, I like physics and graphics, as well as a good story and the ability to do what I please, these elements mixed together is a perfect win for me, but maybe someone else doesn't like the story, or refuses to play the game because they think that the series sold itself etc. etc. It's like when a lesser known musical group that you like gets popular and you don't like their new sound. Whatever. It's opinion. I do like other game genres though and I like to play many games that aren't rated "M".
Portalsnowfox said:The problem that I think with T and E+10 (or whatever) games is that they make the mistake they do with cartoons these days... They feel the need to make the game overly lame by putting elements that only kids the ages of 5-10 would find appealing, even though they are trying to sell the game to pre-teens/teenagers... I don't think they realize that most teenagers find this sort of thing is nearly insulting to their intellect.
There is nothing T rated that even remotely appeals to teenagers 2-3 years away from being considered legally an adult, because when producers, developers, and everything in between think of teenagers, they automatically think of 11-13 year old preteens, and thus the T rating is stamped... Which of course, that then pushes E10+ (or again whatever) down to things that would most likely be considered more appealing to childen under the age of 10.
Hate to break your rose-colored glasses, but Hey Dude and Salute Your Shorts (and prob Angry Beavers also, though I don't remember much of it) are just as inane as anything on TV nowadays.snowfox said:For those who read this that are of my age group, [small] (I'm 23) [/small] Don't you remember shows like Hey dude, Salute your shorts, Rugrats, Ren and Stimpy, Angry Beavers, and although the name escapes me I believe the show was called Gak?
A great portion of these shows were targeted to young viewers and older viewers at the same time. As a youngin when those shows were in their prime, I enjoyed all of them because they all had great storylines, [small] well besides Gak because that was more of a game show if anything[/small] GREAT jokes, and characters you could relate too or connect with.
The shows they have out these days, it makes you wonder, who in their right mind that isn't a preteen or older, watch this crap!!! Everything is so void of anything of intellectual value, only because companies and developers are too afraid to make something that would make younger minds tick, because some parent will go ape shit if it happens to be something that made their darling little angels' mind tick in the wrong direction.
Why attempt to insult me for having a diverse opinion? I'm not saying it worked but I can't help but ask, what does it solve? Please refrain from doing so if you're going to respond to a mature conversation with a different view on the topic...boholikeu said:Hate to break your rose-colored glasses
I dunno if I'm including any of them on my greatest list, but I get the sentiment.LordNue said:Zelda games are mostly E or T too.NBSRDan said:They're not. A few examples that are not:Eggsnham said:Why are all the games worth playing rated "M"?
Donkey Kong Country series: E-E-E
Golden Sun: E-E
Mario & Luigi RPG series: E-E-E
Ratchet & Clank series: T-T-T-T-E-E-E
StarCraft: T
Super Mario 2D platformer series: E-E-E-E
Super Smash Bros. Series: E-T-T
Sorry, I didn't mean to come off so harsh. It's late here, and my posting has the bad habit of getting more incendiary in the wee hours of the morning.snowfox said:Why attempt to insult me for having a diverse opinion? I'm not saying it worked but I can't help but ask, what does it solve? Please refrain from doing so if you're going to respond to a mature conversation with a different view on the topic...boholikeu said:Hate to break your rose-colored glasses
Oblivion was rated T, but they then changed it to M because of a nude mod. Which was stupid because it's only applicable on the computer and it's only if you download/install it yourself.koriantor said:Honestly, there are some games that are M. Such as GTA. There are some games out there rated M that should be T. Like Oblivion. I played it. Never saw a reason for it to be re-rated as M (besides some certain mods, but those shouldn't chagne the actual game's rating).
A good example I've seen is MW2 compared to CoD4. MW2's campaign is incredibly dramatic. It's intensity and action is a lot more than CoD4's. CoD4 should be T. MW2 is rated as it should be.
It's all good, I understand what you mean, and appreciate the apology. You don't see that too often online haha.boholikeu said:Sorry, I didn't mean to come off so harsh. It's late here, and my posting has the bad habit of getting more incendiary in the wee hours of the morning.snowfox said:Why attempt to insult me for having a diverse opinion? I'm not saying it worked but I can't help but ask, what does it solve? Please refrain from doing so if you're going to respond to a mature conversation with a different view on the topic...boholikeu said:Hate to break your rose-colored glasses
Anyway, my point was more that nostalgia tends to warp how we view things. Adults said the save thing of our TV shows when we were young, and the cycle will repeat itself when the current generation of kids gets older.
I'm more curious about what you thought about my "Teen" games comment though. There are seriously plenty of T rated games that are much less insulting of your intellect than the average "mature" title.
Minors can buy games if an approving parent/legal guardian is present, but when "Lil' Jimmy", aged 14; wants to buy say, CoD 4 or CoD MW2 but can't because it's rated "M" and his parents have the no "M" games rule, doesn't he wish that the rating system was more specific towards people of his age group (13-16)? Why deny people experiences because they're under age?boholikeu said:It's my understanding that minors can purchase M rated games provided their parents are there with them. Seems pretty fair to me, so I don't see what's so much better about UK's system.Eggsnham said:Ah, how did I miss demon's souls? It seems like such a good game. In any case, I should clarify, I don't play only "M" games, I just think that limiting these games to people under 17 is stupid; we should have a rating system like the UK's, it's more specific to parents and doesn't promote the thinking of "only a couple more years!" That many people have come to adopt for various reasons in American society. However, I do like games that aren't rated "M", there are many that are great fun and worth every cent. I like to play both MW2 and Ratchet and Clank, two amazing games that are at polar opposites in terms of ratings.
I only suggested that because anyone who thinks that most good games are rated M is obviously ignoring a lot of other good games from another genres. I mean, take RPGs for example. Aside from Bethesda games and post-2005 Bioware games most RPGs are in the E-T range.Eggsnham said:I like shooters, I like RPG's, I like RTS' etc. etc. I don't need to branch out.
That's fine that you were over-generalizing a bit, but just realize that other people are going to see bias when you make a statement like that. It's a bit like if someone were to make a post asking "Why do all good games have amazing graphics?" or "Why are all good games RPGs?".Eggsnham said:I did claim that only good games were rated "M", what I meant to say was along the lines of "Many good games are rated "M"."
Explaining to you and others why a game is great is purely a matter of opinion, I like physics and graphics, as well as a good story and the ability to do what I please, these elements mixed together is a perfect win for me, but maybe someone else doesn't like the story, or refuses to play the game because they think that the series sold itself etc. etc. It's like when a lesser known musical group that you like gets popular and you don't like their new sound. Whatever. It's opinion. I do like other game genres though and I like to play many games that aren't rated "M".
Portalsnowfox said:The problem that I think with T and E+10 (or whatever) games is that they make the mistake they do with cartoons these days... They feel the need to make the game overly lame by putting elements that only kids the ages of 5-10 would find appealing, even though they are trying to sell the game to pre-teens/teenagers... I don't think they realize that most teenagers find this sort of thing is nearly insulting to their intellect.
There is nothing T rated that even remotely appeals to teenagers 2-3 years away from being considered legally an adult, because when producers, developers, and everything in between think of teenagers, they automatically think of 11-13 year old preteens, and thus the T rating is stamped... Which of course, that then pushes E10+ (or again whatever) down to things that would most likely be considered more appealing to childen under the age of 10.
Braid
Metroid Prime
Grim Fandango
Kotor
Planescape: Torment
All have a T rating (or lower)
Are these games so "lame" that they insult your intellect? Cause I'm an adult, yet I still find them pretty witty or interesting.
Also, I was gonna add Arkham Asylum and Uncharted too, but I haven't played them so I can't really vouch for their quality. People say good things about them though.
Hate to break your rose-colored glasses, but Hey Dude and Salute Your Shorts (and prob Angry Beavers also, though I don't remember much of it) are just as inane as anything on TV nowadays.snowfox said:For those who read this that are of my age group, [small] (I'm 23) [/small] Don't you remember shows like Hey dude, Salute your shorts, Rugrats, Ren and Stimpy, Angry Beavers, and although the name escapes me I believe the show was called Gak?
A great portion of these shows were targeted to young viewers and older viewers at the same time. As a youngin when those shows were in their prime, I enjoyed all of them because they all had great storylines, [small] well besides Gak because that was more of a game show if anything[/small] GREAT jokes, and characters you could relate too or connect with.
The shows they have out these days, it makes you wonder, who in their right mind that isn't a preteen or older, watch this crap!!! Everything is so void of anything of intellectual value, only because companies and developers are too afraid to make something that would make younger minds tick, because some parent will go ape shit if it happens to be something that made their darling little angels' mind tick in the wrong direction.
I have proved my worth and am able to play just about any game I'd like, but I feel that kids who have proved their worthiness to play "M" games but remain unnoticed or unacknowledged should have more of a say as to what they play.Low Key said:When you reach a certain age, all things 18+, and in some cases 21+, lose their novelty. Then you'll see things in a more objective light.
It's not that kids under 18 aren't capable of understanding the difference between reality and fantasy, but that it's to keep the tendancy to maim and murder to a minimum until they prove with a reasonable argument that they deserve to play them. It's more of a test to see if you have actually aquired some life skills instead of just saying "mine, mine, mine!" all the time.
Then sometimes you have parents like mine who didn't care what I played, but the serious M games didn't come out until I was already in high school.
I've got nothing to say.. You speak the truth.snowfox said:That's a good to hear you agree with me. It's a safe bet that mid-teens are indeed getting the shaft.Eggsnham said:I personally think that the rating system needs a full overhaul with less gap between the age groups i.e. "E" is intended for everyone between 6-12 (I don't care about "E10") and "T" is intended for kids 13-16 while "M" is obviously 17+. This is unfair and biased towards teenagers, basically it's like saying "We know that you can handle this game mentally, but we won't acknowledge that, because hey, rules is rules." They might as well just flick off anyone between 13-16. And I always thought that Ratchet and Clank was spot on with the humor (then again, my closest memories of R&C was "Up Your Arsenal" when I was 11-12). Everything else I agree with you on.snowfox said:Giving myself da snip!
One thing that I want a point out that's related however. I've noticed in a few T or E(insert number here) games. They insult the players intelligence by having some one constantly remind the player of their current goal within a 20-30 second mark. Sure an on screen blip of the current goal is always nice, but do they honestly think that people can't read that they need to have a verbal reminder every 30 seconds?
I'm not sure the rating of the game but I'm assuming it's either E or T but the original transformers game for the Wii and other possible systems is a fine example of this, since right now nothing else comes to mind at the moment.
Putting all Wii bashing in a box for now. I honestly felt that by having some one constantly remind me of my goal, despite having in game blips and icons directing me visually, was a tad annoying to the point where even I wanted to yell "HULK SMASH!!!"
I wanted to assume that it was in there for younger gamers to help them direct them to their intended target, but I can't think of a certain kid in any age group needing such a constant reminder.
Even if I was of actual age for the games targeted audience... [small] Outside the targeted audience that were either fans of the movie, or people in their 30's that were huge transformer fans back when the original cartoons were a riot, like my brother who practically soiled himself when he first hear there was a live action movie coming out.[/small] I would have felt this to be extremely irritating, regardless of what age I was at the time. Perhaps if I were an extremely young gamer at the age between 5-9 I wouldn't matter so much, because it's obvious that the younger you are, the less irritating everything is for you.
That doesn't make sense though, if they were going to make a game that they knew that, not only were they targeting a younger audience, but also an audience that either grew up with transformers in their hearts and an audience that was moved by the movie. Why irritate 75% of your audience to compensate for the rest?
I guess what I'm trying to say is, it's little things that get passed in development like that, that make the game lose it's appeal to those in the age group that want to be viewed as more mature because at that stage in life, their minds and bodies are taking a turn... [small] For the worst... HAH!!![/small]
They are trying to make these games that are rated T appeal to not only 11-13 year olds, but also 14-16 year olds... Which if memory serves me well, and indeed it does... I can recall having interests at 14-16 years of age that made me wonder why I liked the things I did at 11-13... Though different for everybody, 14-16 year olds start to see themselves a lot differently. For their bodies and minds have passed the rough spots of maturity that left their 11-13 year old selves extremely confused.
Infact, when I placed in charge of a clan in cod4. I found myself making exceptions to my 17+ rule, for I kept finding players with exceptional skill and attitude that were in the 14-16 age group. Although I didn't let every person in that age group in for obvious reasons, there was a good handful that proved to be matured beyond my expectations that made even some of my older clan members seem a little questionable.
It just depends on the person of that age group, but the fact that they are all shot down by the rating system, does not seem very fair for those that could hold a good, deeply serious conversation with me despite our age differences...
I do see a valid point in your response that the rating system needs to be reworked. There should be more of a closing gap to appeal to those in that middle group that depending on the person, they will either most likely feel shafted, or there may be a game here and there that they find entertaining despite it being extremely dumbed down to the point of just damn near insulting.
I do believe it's all a part of the "babying" trend the country is going through these days... Where no company, whether it be gaming, film, or television, wishes to suffer the wrath of the parents for something that could potentially warp the minds of their children.
So they simply just take anything remotely mind warping and we're forced with more or less, 16 years of entertainment that is suitable only for 5-9 year olds.
On the cartoon/television side of things, it is almost as if they assume that every single child has a form of ADD. Hell I know people who take medicine for ADD and ADHD that find these shows to be a giant cluster fuck of illogical random BS. [small] I don't actually believe in such things as ADD. I have a very logical explanation, that I won't get into now to keep the flow of the post going, but if you're a person who was prescribed with ADD medicine and feel slightly offended to this, please don't, it's not to be an insult towards you.. Instead it's an insult to doctors/government/ parents/ etc etc. [/small]
For those who read this that are of my age group, [small] (I'm 23) [/small] Don't you remember shows like Hey dude, Salute your shorts, Rugrats, Ren and Stimpy, Angry Beavers, and although the name escapes me I believe the show was called Gak?
A great portion of these shows were targeted to young viewers and older viewers at the same time. As a youngin when those shows were in their prime, I enjoyed all of them because they all had great storylines, [small] well besides Gak because that was more of a game show if anything[/small] GREAT jokes, and characters you could relate too or connect with.
The shows they have out these days, it makes you wonder, who in their right mind that isn't a preteen or older, watch this crap!!! Everything is so void of anything of intellectual value, only because companies and developers are too afraid to make something that would make younger minds tick, because some parent will go ape shit if it happens to be something that made their darling little angels' mind tick in the wrong direction.
Isn't there anything the TV, film, and gaming companies can do in terms of legal defense that protects them against this sort of thing? Creating a disclaimer for each show and game stating that they aren't responsible for anything the parents feel is unsafe for their children, and if they feel that way they should change the channel or turn it off or take the game away etc etc.
There has got to be some form of legal protection they can come up with to defend themselves from the onslaught of over protective parents so they can get back to releasing products that the other 80% of the population can enjoy..
One can only dream though, I'm sorry if I may have strayed off the topic here and there, but I feel it is all related... Thank you Eggsnham for your response, I'm glad to see I was able to touch on something that you agree with. Although I never got to play that R&C game, I was referring to some of the demos they have on the PS3 at the moment. I forget which one it is, but I remember you played as Clank and had to solve puzzles. The visuals were amazing, the game play was exceptional, but the voice acting and dialogue seemed extremely annoying and, dumbed down. [small] (Especially that damn robot that served as your tutorial guide >:O) [/small]
Edit:
Don't get me wrong, R&C looks like a great game, infact I could safely say it could be one that I may rent one of these days, but I just feel that it may have fallen victim to the degrading affect that the Transformers game suffered from. If you feel differently, just remember it's just a general opinion based on how much of the actual game i got to play.
Your cause is noble, but sometimes life just isn't fair. Parents will be parents and they only do what they think will help you grow up to become a functioning member of society. Most of them anyways. Besides, it's their house, their rules. At 18, those kids can move out and have an M rated game marathon.Eggsnham said:I have proved my worth and am able to play just about any game I'd like, but I feel that kids who have proved their worthiness to play "M" games but remain unnoticed or unacknowledged should have more of a say as to what they play.Low Key said:When you reach a certain age, all things 18+, and in some cases 21+, lose their novelty. Then you'll see things in a more objective light.
It's not that kids under 18 aren't capable of understanding the difference between reality and fantasy, but that it's to keep the tendancy to maim and murder to a minimum until they prove with a reasonable argument that they deserve to play them. It's more of a test to see if you have actually aquired some life skills instead of just saying "mine, mine, mine!" all the time.
Then sometimes you have parents like mine who didn't care what I played, but the serious M games didn't come out until I was already in high school.
Your comment is so horribly true that I can't really say anything. I do believe that there should be a rating system overhaul though.Low Key said:Your cause is noble, but sometimes life just isn't fair. Parents will be parents and they only do what they think will help you grow up to become a functioning member of society. Most of them anyways. Besides, it's their house, their rules. At 18, those kids can move out and have an M rated game marathon.Eggsnham said:I have proved my worth and am able to play just about any game I'd like, but I feel that kids who have proved their worthiness to play "M" games but remain unnoticed or unacknowledged should have more of a say as to what they play.Low Key said:When you reach a certain age, all things 18+, and in some cases 21+, lose their novelty. Then you'll see things in a more objective light.
It's not that kids under 18 aren't capable of understanding the difference between reality and fantasy, but that it's to keep the tendancy to maim and murder to a minimum until they prove with a reasonable argument that they deserve to play them. It's more of a test to see if you have actually aquired some life skills instead of just saying "mine, mine, mine!" all the time.
Then sometimes you have parents like mine who didn't care what I played, but the serious M games didn't come out until I was already in high school.
I saw ads for Portal and Metroid Prime.snowfox said:snip
Because it's still the parent's right to raise their kids how they want. If you have strict parents, tough luck. That's life. Just wait a few more years and you can move out, play any video games you want and never listen to your parents again if you want.Eggsnham said:Minors can buy games if an approving parent/legal guardian is present, but when "Lil' Jimmy", aged 14; wants to buy say, CoD 4 or CoD MW2 but can't because it's rated "M" and his parents have the no "M" games rule, doesn't he wish that the rating system was more specific towards people of his age group (13-16)? Why deny people experiences because they're under age?
There are T rated games that can be insulting to a person's intelligence, but these are also typically bad games that no self-respecting gamer would want to play anyway (I think the example Snowfox gave was the Transformers game...).Eggsnham said:I realize the mistake of my over-generalizing and now regret taking that risk, as half of the posters on this thread have only set out to formulate a long list of fun not "M" rated games.
Snowfox has a point though, there are good "T" games that aren't boring to those under 13 or so years old, we've established that, but that doesn't change the fact that there are games that are insulting to a person's intelligence when played. And a lot of them too.