Because your stupid government keeps dragging our stupid governments into stupid wars. I think it's mostly that.TheYellowCellPhone said:Why are non-Americans so stereotypical and elitist to America?
Because your stupid government keeps dragging our stupid governments into stupid wars. I think it's mostly that.TheYellowCellPhone said:Why are non-Americans so stereotypical and elitist to America?
Gamblerjoe said:A true patriot would not defend the wrong doings of their country. A true patriot has enough respect for their country to point out its flaws and suggest solutions for the betterment of all. Kind of like how a true friend will tell you when your breath smells bad.
But you won't change the opinion of those who adhere to culture A by saying your culture, customs, people and country are superior to theirs.Volf99 said:I didn't say that.......but if you want to get into it, not for the most part.
However if culture A beliefs that its ok to kill babies born with birthmarks, while culture B doesn't, than yep, culture B is superior imo.
Pretty much.Daystar Clarion said:Let them have their patriotism.
Their country is still new, they still have time to do a few more war crimes, maybe colonise some places, kill the natives etc.
You're only young once.
*sips tea*
Yes, quite.
this is also part of the problem: many americans don't know all that much about other places. nowadays pretty much every first world country offers it's citizens the same or more freedoms that americans enjoy. many u.s.-americans don't realize that.Jegsimmons said:We have opportunities very few other countries provide. Here you can be an American and still retain culture.interspark said:it might be just an unfair stereotype, but it's generally believed that if you badmouth america, any nearby americans will go up in arms and get very angry, and i'm just wondering why. Just to clarify, i have nothing against america, but i hardly think it's anything to write home about. and don't say that anyone would be that way about their home country, because if someone came up to be and said "hey, england's crap!" i'd just say "yeah, it is a bit"
i think there's a difference between patriotism and NATIONALISM, which i think people on this thread are confusing. its fine to be a patriot, patriotism is loyalty and love for ones country. Nationalism is an EXTREME form of that that usually ends up in fascism and sometimes racism.Kathinka said:this is also part of the problem: many americans don't know all that much about other places. nowadays pretty much every first world country offers it's citizens the same or more freedoms that americans enjoy. many u.s.-americans don't realize that.Jegsimmons said:We have opportunities very few other countries provide. Here you can be an American and still retain culture.interspark said:it might be just an unfair stereotype, but it's generally believed that if you badmouth america, any nearby americans will go up in arms and get very angry, and i'm just wondering why. Just to clarify, i have nothing against america, but i hardly think it's anything to write home about. and don't say that anyone would be that way about their home country, because if someone came up to be and said "hey, england's crap!" i'd just say "yeah, it is a bit"
when i lived over there i often heard things like "america is the only truely free nation in the world" or "the usa are the onyl real democracy!"
granted, those are extreme examples, not the rule. but it shows nicely why it is so alienating to the rest of the world.
other countries offer all the nice things the USA do. but their citizens are not being dicks about it.
all in all the concept of 'patriotism' is a stupid, dangerous, useless and anachronistic one anyway.
Riiiiiight. The small number of people here hardly make up anything that could be considered a majority in the whole of the good ole USA. My argument stands.The Human Torch said:You are wrong, most Americans in this thread agree with me. The people who are not patriotic are the ones you never hear, cause they could care less.Riff Moonraker said:Sorry, but its NOT the vocal minority. The vocal minority are actually the ones who are NOT patriotic.The Human Torch said:It's just the vocal minority. Which unfortunately (as always) are far more in the spotlight than most Americans, who plainly don't give a crap.
But we've done all of that. Several times.Daystar Clarion said:Let them have their patriotism.
Their country is still new, they still have time to do a few more war crimes, maybe colonise some places, kill the natives etc.
You're only young once.
*sips tea*
Yes, quite.
But that's a silly thing to say. Surely the imaginary lines on the map that we call boarders should be decided upon who wants to be part of who, not some undefined status quo.Volf99 said:I'm sure if they were under Argentinian rule for just as long, they would want to remain Argentinian. I think that vote has to do more with people not wanting to change.Lethos said:But the people want to be British. They voted to remain British.Volf99 said:I meant to type Falklands not Faroe Islands, my bad. Anyways, the whole issue should be between Argentina and the Falklands, England has no right to but in between the two places anymore than it does butting in between any issues Hong Kong has with Mainland China.Daystar Clarion said:The Islands didn't belong to anyone, and that was pretty much the 'in thing' at the time. You know. Finding places.Volf99 said:"Fair game"? Really? Sounds more like Imperialism to me. Why would a country that is 777.8 miles away from the Faroe Islands, need to go there? Honestly?Daystar Clarion said:Ask that to the people who live there.Volf99 said:The issue with the Falkland Islands, England has no right being there anymore than they did being in Hong Kong.EvilPicnic said:Not disputing your argument (which I mostly agree with), but what exactly did England do to Argentina?Volf99 said:To quote John Dalberg-Acton, "Power corrupts, and absoulte power corrupts absolutely". Think about if this government gave to ok to do something like what (PRC)China is doing to Tibet, America is doing at Guantanamo Bay, what England did to Ireland/India/China/Africa/Argentina. Who could oppose them? They would be the most powerful organized body in the entire world. It would be to risky to have.
Be among the first to recognise their sovereignty as a nation? Invest heavily in their economy when they most needed it? Lose to their football team due to an illegal handball (and constantly thereafter)? Or defend themselves in the Falkland Islands when the Argentines invaded?
The British Empire did not have a great Human Rights record, but I don't think Argentina is generally included on the list of abuses...
The islands were uninhabited when they were discovered, so it was fair game.
When soverignty came into dispute, they even let the islanders vote on who they wanted to be part of.
The British did many terrible things in their colonial days, but the Falklands was not one of them.
It's like North Ireland, in that England is sticking its nose where it doesn't belong. Hong Kong could have voted to remain British, but that doesn't change the fact that it's part of (PRC)China.
Not properly.Blindswordmaster said:But we've done all of that. Several times.Daystar Clarion said:Let them have their patriotism.
Their country is still new, they still have time to do a few more war crimes, maybe colonise some places, kill the natives etc.
You're only young once.
*sips tea*
Yes, quite.