Why are MOST PC gamers full of so much hatred towards Consoles?

Recommended Videos

Danceofmasks

New member
Jul 16, 2010
1,512
0
0
Douk said:
Well it was just a thought I threw out there, I don't think its the #1 reason. Also the quality of games on PC and Consoles is all opinion anyways. Of course everyone is using a computer, this is 2011. How many PC games are being played is something pretty difficult to find out.
It isn't the #1 reason, or the #99 reason. It's not a reason at all, 'cos it's wrong.
There's a kid up some posts says he runs Starcraft 2 on ultra with a $200 computer.
While I doubt the veracity of that, the total cost of a console + computer (that everyone owns) is higher than the total cost of a gaming computer.

That, and the AAA game titles are cheaper.

If there's any reason PC gamers hate consoles (and I don't think they do at all, that's also bullshit), it's 'cos console gamers can't math.
 

jman5411

New member
Jun 15, 2009
22
0
0
nuba km said:
[HEADING=1]CONSOLES WERE MADE FOR GAMING NOT PC'S[/HEADING]
sorry I just needed to get that out there to why consoles are better.
NO THEY WERE NOT!!
READ A BOOK AND YOU'D REALIZE THAT PC'S HAVE BEEN GAMING FAR BEFORE CONSOLES!

see the stupidity of console users!?
this is why we hate consoles.
 

Netrigan

New member
Sep 29, 2010
1,924
0
0
Krylock said:
Usually in most threads you come across, full of PC gamers (fanboys, if you will) and Console gamers, it always turns into a gigantic flame war on what is better.

One thing that i always did notice is that the PC gamers are usually the ones to start the whole war. It almost seems like they get enjoyment out of starting pointless arguments and debates. Big deal, you paid nearly 1 grand, maybe more just so you can game with a mouse and a keyboard. Paying more for your gaming situation gives you no excuse to talk down on people who pay less for their gaming set ups (I.e console gamers).

I also see no legitimate reasons being stated as to why they hate console gaming. They just start bringing up the whole "Specs vs Specs" debate, and never state factual statements on why they hate/dislike consoles/console gamers.

Why can't you enjoy both? I'm a console gamer/ex PC gamer, but i enjoyed both without bad mouthing on or the other.

I respect both console and PC gamers highly, and i honestly don't see why there always has to be a pointless argument over which is better.

Both platforms have pros and cons, along with excellent games. Some fantastic games are on the PC which are not cross-platform. Some Fantastic games are on the console which are also exclusive.

Thanks for reading, and i hope you do respect this post as a form of ones opinion.
A lot of it centers on what's called "dumbing down".

FPS are slightly different beasts on PCs and consoles. On the PC, there was a major proliferation of extra keys. One to crouch, one to lie prone, one to run, one to sprint, one to hold your breath, two to lean, etc. Most of this has been simplified or eliminated because of the influence of consoles. And in the Xbox original days, games developed for the PC/console took a *major* hit in terms of game content because the consoles simply couldn't handle the large environments that were becoming the norm in PC gaming. A lot of this has smoothed out since the PS3/360 came out, but there's still the sense that console system specs are holding back development. Larger areas, more enemies, better AI... all of these CPU/VPU intensive things are capable on the PC, while consoles are struggling with system limitations.

On the RPG front, inventory management is much simplier on PCs because of the mouse/keyboard combo and increasingly games use a console interface. Again, we're dealing with loads of added buttons on PC making a more "deep" experience.

I'm actually of the opinion that there's a lot of control simplification that is needed, although consoles do come up a bit short on the button issue... but I think they're close enough to get the job done. Devs simply over-do the simplifications to reach a wider market, which isn't a console/PC problem. A lot of the trends that get blamed on console have their roots in the PC scene, but stuff like recharging health had the misfortune of dropping on consoles first.

But it's really all to do with the frustration that games are no longer getting tougher and deeper, but are getting easier and simplified. The console market is a big part of that, but I don't think it's entirely to blame, as console genres have been getting easier and more simplified, too. This has more to do with trying to expand the reach of video games and making a more newbie-friendly experience.
 

Sonic Doctor

Time Lord / Whack-A-Newbie!
Jan 9, 2010
3,042
0
0
jman5411 said:
PC gaming HD since the 90's. Console gaming, still not HD.
I play on a PC and console. I can tell you right now consoles are in HD now. With most games, if you don't have an HDTV, the games will look like crap, because they are HD and meant for HDTVs.
 

nuba km

New member
Jun 7, 2010
5,052
0
0
jman5411 said:
yes pc were gaming first but then people decided to make a machine specifically designed to play games called a 'console', if you call me stupid I will tread you like a idiot. So consoles were made to play video games but pc were made for general tasks and if a key board and mouse were the best controls for most games then consoles would have a keyboard and mouse.
 

jman5411

New member
Jun 15, 2009
22
0
0
Sonic Doctor said:
jman5411 said:
PC gaming HD since the 90's. Console gaming, still not HD.
I play on a PC and console. I can tell you right now consoles are in HD now. With most games, if you don't have an HDTV, the games will look like crap, because they are HD and meant for HDTVs.
really?

so tell me what Alan Wake's resolution was? or how bout all the Call of Duty games?

please enlighten me.
 

jman5411

New member
Jun 15, 2009
22
0
0
nuba km said:
jman5411 said:
yes pc were gaming first but then people decided to make a machine specifically designed to play games called a 'console', if you call me stupid I will tread you like a idiot. So consoles were made to play video games but pc were made for general tasks and if a key board and mouse were the best controls for most games then consoles would have a keyboard and mouse.
alcohol was also once used as a medicine. makes your point completely moot.
just because something is made for a particular reason, does not mean its the best at that particular function.

thanks for coming out though. care to argue more?
 

Deleted

New member
Jul 25, 2009
4,054
0
0
Danceofmasks said:
Douk said:
Well it was just a thought I threw out there, I don't think its the #1 reason. Also the quality of games on PC and Consoles is all opinion anyways. Of course everyone is using a computer, this is 2011. How many PC games are being played is something pretty difficult to find out.
It isn't the #1 reason, or the #99 reason. It's not a reason at all, 'cos it's wrong.
There's a kid up some posts says he runs Starcraft 2 on ultra with a $200 computer.
While I doubt the veracity of that, the total cost of a console + computer (that everyone owns) is higher than the total cost of a gaming computer.

That, and the AAA game titles are cheaper.

If there's any reason PC gamers hate consoles (and I don't think they do at all, that's also bullshit), it's 'cos console gamers can't math.
Remorse is a very real thing and if you think all PC gamers are intelligent reasonable people then you're wrong. Every fanbase has the guys who would defend their choice to avoid the feeling of remorse.

People play PC because they like the games on it, and the features it offers like modding and online buying. People play consoles because they enjoy the games on it, and the features like playing with friends. I own a gaming PC and a lot of consoles and I play eat roughly equally. The fact that you're even TRYING to convince someone that whatever you have is better means you aren't satisfied with what you have until everyone knows it. (not you specifically I mean you as in "random person")
 

Joe Herbert

New member
Oct 13, 2010
17
0
0
jman5411 said:
But if you have a gamepad then the experience is the same if not better than a console no?
not necessarily. 'back in the day' when those fighting games did come out you were limited to either a single 4-axis 4-button controller or two 2-axis 2-button controllers. There was no USB you had to use the game port on your sound card. (if you even had a sound card). nowadays we have the ability to plug in almost any configuration of game pad or controller we want in almost any combination. but you still have to huddle around you're computer monitor or find some way to route your video to an HDTV and find a way to get you're controllers to the couch (unless you use Bluetooth). This dose work. but it's not the same experience. even though i play my x-box on my computer monitor. somethings just go better with the console. ALSO some console games like Red Faction WILL allow you to connect a USB mouse and keyboard to the console. but here you have issues sitting on the couch trying to play with a mouse and keyboard. the controls have changed. but the console experience has just become very uncomfortable. Another advantage consoles have is the ability to just pop the disc out and bring it to you're friend's place. no worries about configuration or installation or licencing.
 

jman5411

New member
Jun 15, 2009
22
0
0
Joe Herbert said:
jman5411 said:
But if you have a gamepad then the experience is the same if not better than a console no?
This dose work. but it's not the same experience.
So explain what makes it not the same experience.

We've already ruled out that a pc can be hooked up to an hdtv if you dont want to hook it up to a pc monitor and that you can either use wireless or wired controlers with the pc? I'm still trying to figure out why its not the same experience?

No xbox live fee if you're playing online with xbox. And the visuals will be better without a doubt.

So what is missing?
 

captain underpants

New member
Jun 8, 2010
179
0
0
Krylock said:
One thing that i always did notice is that the PC gamers are usually the ones to start the whole war.
Except in this case, obviously.

Krylock said:
It almost seems like they get enjoyment out of starting pointless arguments and debates. Big deal, you paid nearly 1 grand, maybe more just so you can game with a mouse and a keyboard. Paying more for your gaming situation gives you no excuse to talk down on people who pay less for their gaming set ups (I.e console gamers).
Obvious troll. You're doing well.

Krylock said:
I also see no legitimate reasons being stated as to why they hate console gaming. They just start bringing up the whole "Specs vs Specs" debate, and never state factual statements on why they hate/dislike consoles/console gamers.
More legitimate than say 'paid nearly 1 grand, maybe more just so you can game with a mouse and a keyboard'?

Krylock said:
...i honestly don't see why there always has to be a pointless argument over which is better.
Pointless argument is the lifeblood of internet life. Get used to it. If it's not pc vs console it's xbox vs playstation, or amd vs intel, or sim vs arcade, or any one of a million other pointless arguments. And that's just within gaming.

Krylock said:
Thanks for reading, and i hope you do respect this post as a form of ones opinion.
It's certainly an interesting study in irony.
 

poiuppx

New member
Nov 17, 2009
674
0
0
I used to be heavily into PC gaming. RTS, RPG, FPS, puzzle, sim, what...ever genre we wanna classify Twinsen's Odyssey as... I ran the gambit. I've stayed up past the point of sanity trying to beat Marathon and the Might & Magic games, and I've put up with the crap on the scale of Tresspasser and its ilk.

These days? Unless I find a damn good deal on a PC game, I just play console. Honestly, it's less hassle. At the end of the day, I don't care if my games have the most state-of-the-art graphics or if the aiming is automatic or mouse based or joystick based or guided by thundergnomes from Odin's front lawn. I just want to play a damn game and have fun with it. I don't give a damn about mods; if a game is good, I let it stand on its own merits, and if it's not I just move on.

The PC market still has legs, and yeah, if I wanted to play an RTS, I'd go there since keyboard and mouse works a hell of a lot better than controllers. I don't look down on PC gaming. It's just not really for me anymore.

And for the whole casual versus hardcore debate and console gaming's role there-in... with all due respect, get over yourselves. More people enjoying this hobby is not the end of days. It just means more people are having fun. Which is the damn point. Fun. If people are having fun, then the hobby is working. If they're not, then it's not. Just because you played the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy text adventure until you won doesn't mean you get to declare Bejeweled or Halo as being immaterial. You have your fun, they have theirs.
 

ElNeroDiablo

New member
Jan 6, 2011
167
0
0
Blargle, starting reading this and typing a reply to it around 3:40am AEDT, now it's around 6:25am AEDT!

TL;DR for those who want condense and don't want to have to scroll to the end of the post:
For the person trying to start a PC Vs. Console flamewar - good bloody luck. Not every PC gamer hates consoles because "they aren't a PC!", some of us have a gamut from general apathy for the bulk of the market to distilled hatred of a console maker due to how they've shafted the PC realm over the past near-30 years.

Yes you CAN build a system for as low as $500 USD or as high as $2,500 USD, but it mostly relies on WHAT you want the system to do, what length of time you expect the system to be running for before you have to completely replace it, and how much you're looking to spend on parts and quality V. quantity of them.

For the "rift" between "PC Gamers" and "Console Gamers", there's an even LARGER one between "Windows Users", "Mac Users" and "Linux Geeks"!

I'll get into the realm of cost of consoles and their games Vs. the cost of buying parts of a gaming computer, and the recurring costs for things like internet, and the difference in price jacking (for EVERYTHING) between USA & Australia in a later post.

Also, if you wanna talk about TFU (Totally Fucked Up) things (to borrow a term and phrase from AngryAussie on YT) - then talk about how Australia has absolutely ~NO R-18+ rating for video games~ which causes things to be EXTRA delayed as they get cut down to MA-15+ or not released in Australia ~AT ALL~. (some games like Duke Nukem 3D did get RC, then MA-15+ after 'locking out' things to be sold here before shit hit the fan over a patch available on the maker's site basically did away with the parental lock and the classification board tried pulling the game, but that's neither here nor there)

~~~~~

I'm a PC gamer, been one most of my life. I do ~NOT~ hate console gamers or the majority of console and their games.
Until I bought my DSi (then DS Lite) for the HeartGold/SoulSilver (then Diamond/Pearl/Platinum) Pokemon games, I had not touched a handheld console or game since the days of Pokemon Red/Blue and Crash Test Dummies on the old GameBoy (and even then, they were borrowed), as I didn't find much interest in the bulk of handheld games 'till my DSi and even then it was mostly nostalgia for the series as a whole.
Last TV console I found to be worth possibly getting was a N64 for Pokemon stadium 1/2 & 007: GoldenEye (Multiplayer), before I got introduced to Wii Sports a year or two ago at a friends place, which eventually led me to getting a Wii of my own only a month ago (and it hasn't seen much use yet, but that'll change).
In the years between my last playing of a N64 and getting my Wii, I had played various PlayStation and X-Box games like Abe's Oddysey on the PS1 and Halo 1 on the X-Box, both at friends places, but they failed to sway me to the Console side. However, at a PC Lan party back in '06, I was introduced to Halo 1 on the PC and got hooked on it, whilst the same game on the X-Box got nothing but apathy out of me, and this eventually lead me to getting Halo 1 for PC a year or so ago.

Now, I've been playing games on the PC since about 1993 (same time I was watching the Original Mighty Morphing Power Rangers, with Jason/Austin St. John, Billy/David Yost, Zack/Walter Jones, Trini/Thuy Trang (R.I.P.), Kimberly/Amy Jo Johnson, Tommy/Jason David Frank, Rocky/Steve Cardinas, Adam/Johnny Yong Bosch, Aisha/Karen Ashley & Katherine/Catherine Sutherland), and since then I've played games ranging from Zoombinis, 3001: A Math Oddysey and Lemmings, to DOOM/2/Final/Ultimate (Screw Doom 3!), Grand Theft Auto 2, Duke Nukem, Rise Of The Triad, Quake 3 (Opena Arena for a Free/Open Source Software version) and Team Fortress 2 to Starcraft, Diablo, Diablo II/Lord of Destruction and Warcraft 3/Frozen Throne, to Star Trek Online, City of Heroes/Villians and World of Warcraft. I even own a copy of Minecraft that I run on my refurbished Dell Optiplex GX520 (3GHz 64-bit P4) with XP Home SP3, or my refurbished Optiplex 745 (2.13GHz 64-bit Core 2 Duo) with Ubuntu 10.10, and I actually tend to get better game play out of Minecraft under LINUX than I do in Win XP, and both systems cost me under $400 AUD before I put in a old PCI ATI Radeon 9250 (256MB) into the GX520 and a semi-recent PCI-E NVidia 9400GT (1GB) into the 745, and Linux isn't even TRYING to make the most out of the possible power of the 9400GT (put my 32-bit XP Pro on that system, and it'd probably SCREAM along, even though it's 32-bit OS on 64-bit hardware).

Now, yes you can play the bulk of those on <$500 USD systems, but (personally) to get the best performance out of games like STO (which I was BARELY running on a old 32-bit 3GHz P4 with 3GB of DDR1 RAM and a NVidia 7600GS AGP that I'd been using in one form or another since 2004 to 2010) or TF2 and have a system that'll last you a good 4-5 years, you need a system around the $1000-1250 USD mark in parts, as that gives you access to better quality parts and a somewhat wider range of parts to choose from for building a decent custom PC gaming rig.

Also, whilst I generally harbour no ill will towards consoles, their games or their gamers, I do have a beef with one particualr console maker/developer/producer who is also a company who swipes code from other operating systems, hacks it up, then jams it in their own OS and tries to screw of the end user with a PoS EULA and retail prices upto 5, maybe even 6 or 7 times what they charge big-name OEM's for the same thing, and even hack-out functions that are usable and even wanted OUTSIDE the business enterprise.
Yes, I do prefer Open Source software, and only work with Windows since a significant portion of what I do on my PC is generally locked to a Windows-only market (I'm not enough of a pretentious arsehole with a crapload of money to burn whilst kissing the arse of Jobs to go Mac, maybe if I WORKED for Apple, then I'd use Apple products, but until then it's general PC market for me).
Yes, I know that Linux isn't common enough for the "average joe" and isn't Microsoft Windows, but it's slowly moving to have a Windows-like design and look to it whilst trying to make it more on the pre-built PC market which already has Microsoft and Apple trying to beat the hell out of the other over it (and most of the advances of Linux on pre-built desktops like those sold by Dell and HP has in the past been met with dirty tactics from MS about cutting access to cheap copies of Windows and CD keys for it on their machines).

~~~~~

Sturmdolch said:
I think you're taking the loudest minority and saying every PC Gamer is like that. With that logic, every British person is Margaret Thatcher, every American is Texan, and every gamer is a loud nerd. It's not nice to stereotype.
And to widen the band of stereotypes a touch further with one that hits hard to me - "Every Australian is Crocodile (friggen) Dundee/Steve Irwin!". Yes, I absolutely HATE the stereotype that all ~CAUCASIAN~ Australians (aka: ones with roots back to the UK, maybe US) are 6'4", built like a brick outhouse and wear hats with crocodile teeth in them, who walk around shirtless (or with shirts that are more form-fitting vests) and beat the crap out of any living thing in their way (see: Saxton Hale for a game-based example).
 

Odin311

New member
Mar 11, 2010
56
0
0
Mouldy Oldy said:
Hmm. My first post. Better make it a good one.
Amazing post. I agree wholeheartedly.


Here is my take on this topic:

I fell that the PC is a more enjoyable platform for me to play. I still play on my ps3, and 360, but I find that I enjoy playing my computer more. Knowing this, one might be able to understand why I don't like the current trends in gaming, i.e. developing primarily for the consoles. All a publisher is concerned about is profit. They aren't going out of their way to make us happy with games we want, or with advancing gaming. They just want to make more money.

It's amazing that people are so quick to defend there chosen platform, or game. The point of gaming is to have fun. If you are having fun with whatever you are playing on, thats awesome!

If you need to feel superior to someone by making outrageous claims, using words like "most" "everyone" and "always"; you need to grow up. Once we learn that everyone is different, and finds different enjoyment out of different things/consoles/games, we can begin to develop as a single group of "gamers" and be happy that someone is playing and having fun. Even if it's on a different platform than your.
 

Joe Herbert

New member
Oct 13, 2010
17
0
0
jman5411 said:
So explain what makes it not the same experience.

We've already ruled out that a pc can be hooked up to an hdtv if you dont want to hook it up to a pc monitor and that you can either use wireless or wired controlers with the pc? I'm still trying to figure out why its not the same experience?

No xbox live fee if you're playing online with xbox. And the visuals will be better without a doubt.

So what is missing?
"experience" is more than just control pads and TVs. And now we are getting into the realm of things that it's really hard to put you're finger on. So i will run through examples.

Deadspace
Got it for the PC, plugged it into my parents massive HDTV and used an Xbox360 controller. got frustrated with it. when i plugged it back into my monitor and keyboard / mouse i continued playing but still didn't have much fun. got an XBOX 360 and said f*ckit, and got a used copy of deadspace for xbox.(yes i had a controller before i had a console) brought it over to a friends place and we had a great time beating it. I'm starting to think that the pc version is an afterthought.

Emulators
I love OLD games. So i ofcorse have many many emulators on my machine. they are easy to use and free! the mostly play just like the console i'm emulating. so why do i own an NES and a Genesis? i just find them more enjoyable on there intended console.

i guess allot of it has to be the difference also between the social interaction of a Lan Party vs just having a friend over and playing DOA4 or Call of Duty. Two different experiences. Honestly all i can say is you have to try it.
 

jman5411

New member
Jun 15, 2009
22
0
0
Joe Herbert said:
jman5411 said:
Joe Herbert said:
So explain what makes it not the same experience.

We've already ruled out that a pc can be hooked up to an hdtv if you dont want to hook it up to a pc monitor and that you can either use wireless or wired controlers with the pc? I'm still trying to figure out why its not the same experience?

No xbox live fee if you're playing online with xbox. And the visuals will be better without a doubt.

So what is missing?
"experience" is more than just control pads and TVs. And now we are getting into the realm of things that it's really hard to put you're finger on. So i will run through examples.

Deadspace
Got it for the PC, plugged it into my parents massive HDTV and used an Xbox360 controller. got frustrated with it. when i plugged it back into my monitor and keyboard / mouse i continued playing but still didn't have much fun. got an XBOX 360 and said f*ckit, and got a used copy of deadspace for xbox.(yes i had a controller before i had a console) brought it over to a friends place and we had a great time beating it. I'm starting to think that the pc version is an afterthought.

i guess allot of it has to be the difference also between the social interaction of a Lan Party vs just having a friend over and playing DOA4 or Call of Duty. Two different experiences. Honestly all i can say is you have to try it.
The thing is I have tried it. I have a ps3 and i got a damn good discount on the game from work (ended up coming up to about $9) Played it and noticed no difference at all between the two versions except for the fact that the ps3 version was a blurry mess. Now granted you played it with a friend and had a better time maybe it was not the game itself but the environment you played it in. The two versions of the game are identical and usually are when they're just console ports. Hence why i asked what in "the experience" was different.
 

Mouldy Oldy

New member
Jan 6, 2011
23
0
0
Joe Herbert said:
I'm starting to think that the pc version is an afterthought.

You'd be correct - it wasn't optimised, especially in controlling code, for PCs at all. Well known case, made worse when the dev. team tried to claim that the control issues were "to build the experience". Or rather [EA spokesperson]: "Dead Space for PC is an equivalent experience to that on consoles. The controls are different and customizable, but we feel it?s in the best ability for the players to match what the console experience is like."

This lead to some serious investigation, such as:

So the worst problems, it seems, happen when your PC is actually too fast. Crazy.

Of course, the game's developers likely didn't run into this problem on any of the consoles. And yes, I was more likely than most to encounter this problem in a really nasty way, given the sort of hardware I was packing. But none of this changes the fact that the game's controls are basically broken on the PC platform. The easiest workaround is to make sure you use sufficiently demanding graphical settings to keep frame rates from getting too high. However, this fix is only partial, because frame rates will vary as you play the game. Every once in a while, you'll enter an elevator or other tight space, the FPS counter will spike, and the mouse response will slow down.


http://techreport.com/discussions.x/16061



So, the actual issue was eventually tied down to PCs running the game too fast.i.e. Hardware running your code too fast.

PC Gamers don't hate console owners for issues such as this - most people will see the culprit of bullshit being the EA rep. PR / Marketing departments need to be treated in a Gengis Khan type fashion.


Oh, and if you need irony - many newer AA titles (Neverwinter Nights II is a classic) run into issues when they don't limit frames (because, you know, why code it if the console cannot produce more than X with fixed hardware? Too much hassle), which leads to massive heat spikes in GPUs & fatal crashes due to over-heating. Dragon Age is known for it as well - so console games are actually damaging PC owner's machines. This is not a good thing.
 

Joe Herbert

New member
Oct 13, 2010
17
0
0
jman5411 said:
The thing is I have tried it. I have a ps3 and i got a damn good discount on the game from work (ended up coming up to about $9) Played it and noticed no difference at all between the two versions except for the fact that the ps3 version was a blurry mess. Now granted you played it with a friend and had a better time maybe it was not the game itself but the environment you played it in. The two versions of the game are identical and usually are when they're just console ports. Hence why i asked what in "the experience" was different.
Perhaps you are one of those people who are 'immune' to this particular experience. It happens. I don't see the difference between watching movies on my monitor rather than a TV. But i know a WHOLE lot of people who just don't like it. (even though the difference between a good monitor and an HDTV is just about zero.) We are really running into the 'feeling' of a game. and if you don't 'feel' the difference, you never will... which is perfectly fine. feel free to toss that PS3 into the depths of the nearest body of water. but you will continually run into people who DO 'feel' the difference weather or not you feel the reasons are valid.