why are there no WW1 games?

Recommended Videos

The Tommy

New member
Aug 19, 2009
164
0
0
Bamboochakill said:
is the mod for Red Orchestra Ostfront 41-45, or is there another sort of Red Orchestra?
Yes its for Ostrfront 41-45

Xandus117 said:
Trench Warefare would make an awful RTS.

However, a game based of WWI could make an excellent Total War game.
Couldn't agree more. Trench warfare needs to be experienced on a small personal scale. RTS could use 1914 or 1918 which were the most mobile years of the War for the Western Front. RTS would need to make an alternate history.
 

Ben7

New member
Apr 15, 2009
311
0
0
WW1 is untapped Potential for an awesome game. Im so so tired of the constant stream of generic WW2 games.
 

Bamboochakill

New member
Aug 10, 2009
97
0
0
ain't everybody tired of ww2 games now? wouldn't they try something new like a ww1 game? most say no because it would be like 10 seconds reload time, but they never tried a ww1 game and are totaly prejudiced!
 

suhlEap

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,044
0
0
iron europe sounds very interesting, it looks like this thread was timed just before some games came about, so that was lucky. it'll be interesting to see how these games will be!
 

suhlEap

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,044
0
0
does it give you a reason that you can't run it? other than using vista?
there's probably patches on the website somewhere.
 

hamsterlord20

New member
Aug 11, 2009
2
0
0
joe51498 said:
because all the wepons would suck
um, something I just want to mention on this topic. Despite most of these weapons were slow reloading and unreliable, one shot of these at a close range could leave fist sized holes in people. For those hungering a gory war game, they would probabbly really enjoy a WW1 game.




Also with the debate between the US's involvement in WW1 and such, JUST SHUT UP! This is a conversation about a WW1 game, not a fucking history class! Move on!
 

suhlEap

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,044
0
0
hamsterlord20 said:
joe51498 said:
because all the wepons would suck
um, something I just want to mention on this topic. Despite most of these weapons were slow reloading and unreliable, one shot of these at a close range could leave fist sized holes in people. For those hungering a gory war game, they would probabbly really enjoy a WW1 game.




Also with the debate between the US's involvement in WW1 and such, JUST SHUT UP! This is a conversation about a WW1 game, not a fucking history class! Move on!
yeah this is true, i do like the idea of leaving a fist sized hole in someone...
and welcome to the escapist!
 

The Tommy

New member
Aug 19, 2009
164
0
0
hamsterlord20 said:
joe51498 said:
because all the wepons would suck


Also with the debate between the US's involvement in WW1 and such, JUST SHUT UP! This is a conversation about a WW1 game, not a fucking history class! Move on!
Debate is good. Its informative and apparently for some people (unlike yourself)the lack of understanding causes close mindedness towards this idea. Perhaps with a bit of history, people can appreciate the subject and therefore understand if not embrace the idea of a WWI game.
 

Diablini

New member
May 24, 2009
1,027
0
0
Oh me God! Such a question can bend time and space as we all know it which could lead to a time parodox destroying the entire universe. Or it could lead to something of even bigger magnitude - The release of The Duke.
 

The Tommy

New member
Aug 19, 2009
164
0
0
Bamboochakill said:
plz help me to fix it so i can play iron europe plz plz plz
I think IE is still in development so don't worry about getting on it right away. I'm keeping a sharp eye on this and other games like To End All Wars and some other mods. It seems for the time being that mods will be all we get. Large producers are toying with other eras in Darkest Days to see if an FPS style game will catch on with another period prior to WWII. If the story and game design sucks, it will just make it harder to get people interested. Tannenberg isn't the best place to try a WWI environment in my honest opinion.
 

The Tommy

New member
Aug 19, 2009
164
0
0
Diablini said:
Oh me God! Such a question can bend time and space as we all know it which could lead to a time parodox destroying the entire universe. Or it could lead to something of even bigger magnitude - The release of The Duke.
Your avatar says it all....
 

nakburz

New member
Jul 23, 2009
8
0
0
well if you go to bubble box.com you can play warfare 1914 or whatever and it is a strategy game based on ww1 its alright but gets boring a little fast
 

The Tommy

New member
Aug 19, 2009
164
0
0
nakburz said:
well if you go to bubble box.com you can play warfare 1914 or whatever and it is a strategy game based on ww1 its alright but gets boring a little fast
You mean warfare 1917? I enjoy it but that's just me. Not quite fair however to judge WWI as setting when your playing it through a small flash game. But hey, people still like tetris so boring has its advantages to right?
 

Howitttzer

New member
Aug 15, 2009
5
0
0
What I personally think would work far better than a WWI game (a conflict which, most people seem to agree, doesn't seem to translate well to the third or first person shooter, or RTS genres), would be a game set during the Russian Revolution and Civil War (1917-1923, a similar period).

While it might be necessary to have our hypothetical hero be betrayed by his Communist superiors, due to the Soviet Unions errr... image in the western world -there is such a wealth of material, that if you were set on doing a game in this period, I think the Russian Revolution would be the logical choice.

Just off the top of my head, our game could begin with a bit of backstory on our character- maybe he could have been one of Rasputin's assassins? And have gone on to nurture revolt in the capitol? Which would then transition nicely into the butchery that the Tsar unleashed on the protestors in Petrograd, in the final days of his rule- heck, you could even make it a tutorial if you liked- fighting back soldiers and mounted Cossacks with big fuzzy hats.

From there, maybe to the Kornilov revolt- give us a little cutscene about being imprisoned when the new government came to power for the deaths of those men, and then let us loose again from the prison, along with all the rest, with a rifle and a big old pistol to prevent the General and his men from succeeding in their coup...

And on and on- to Petrograd in October to fight through the streets and capture key buildings- the armory, the communications buildings, ect- and finally an assault on and through the Winter palace (I know, this part was nearly bloodless, but hey, artistic license is available when making a game...).

Then next, across the Russian tundra by train in winter, to capture the Ukraine and fight against the counter-revolutionary White army- and so on and so forth, maybe to our dramatic betrayal, and turnaround.

Anyway, what I'm trying to get at is that not only is there lots of very dramatic material, and some very varied locations and scenery, but there is no trench warfare! We've got house to house, through cities, palaces, and across the Russian plains (into the mountains even, if you like)- but all of this would mesh much better with the style of shooter people have grown used to: fast paced, lots of movement, and some cover, if our hypothetical dev were to take it in that direction, than trench warfare would.

(And hey, some of those locations would be pretty cool- I'd rather poke my rifle aroud a banister in the winter palace and have someone try to blow my head off than fight through muddy, mortar-shelled-plain + hill #23.)