Why aren't more realistic and serious animated movies being made?

Recommended Videos

The Last Nomad

Lost in Ethiopia
Oct 28, 2009
1,426
0
0
Queen Michael said:
Abandon4093 said:
There are simply too many to put down.

I honestly wouldn't know where to even start with a task like that.

And being fanciful/whimsical/unrealistic =/= childish. It's just fiction. Most live action films aimed at adults don't fit that criteria.
The Last Nomad said:
Queen Michael said:
Both of them contain sci-fi elements. Not that realistic, really.
How does realism have ANYTHING to do with whether a film is intended for an adult or children audience?

The few films that are animated that are certainly not for kids that I can think of right this minute are all unrealistic to some degree. Either by including sci-fi elements (Which aren't always totally unrealistic, just futuristic, Like A Scanner Darkly, which is certainly not for children) or by having some sort of supernatural being like a ghost or vampire or some weird hellbeasts. If these movies didn't include that little bit of unrealistic material then they could have just been made without any animation.
How about non-animated films with nonrealistic elements. Are they for kids? Total Recall? I think not.

Your arguement is extremely invalid.
I never said that movies that don't fit my criteria aren't mature/for adults. Why didn't you read my original post? "Your arguement is extremely invalid." No, because I never made that argument.
I did indeed read you're OP, but it sounds like you didn't read the title, where you are asking why are there no adult animated films, but through the OP, that question changes to why are there no animated films that fit your specific criteria.
You may not have tried to, but you did put forward the arguement that unrealistic films are not for adults? What I want to know is how can you explain that logic? It kinda baffles me to be honest.
 

Blindswordmaster

New member
Dec 28, 2009
3,145
0
0
If the plot doesn't involve fantastic elements, then why waste time and money by animating it? One of the great points of animation is that you can draw anything! If you aren't going to take advantage of that with great visuals, then why would you bother spending the money and time animating something that could just as easily shot live action for a fraction of the cost?
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
Blindswordmaster said:
If the plot doesn't involve fantastic elements, then why waste time and money by animating it? One of the great points of animation is that you can draw anything! If you aren't going to take advantage of that with great visuals, then why would you bother spending the money and time animating something that could just as easily shot live action for a fraction of the cost?
then we'd lose the unique beauty of animation. That's my answer, and it's a quote from my original post. You really ought to have read it.
 

AlexNora

New member
Mar 7, 2011
207
0
0
i cant stand animated realistic-looking people its boring and pointless and a fast way to get me to ignore your manga, movie, poster blot blot blot...
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
The Last Nomad said:
Queen Michael said:
Abandon4093 said:
There are simply too many to put down.

I honestly wouldn't know where to even start with a task like that.

And being fanciful/whimsical/unrealistic =/= childish. It's just fiction. Most live action films aimed at adults don't fit that criteria.
The Last Nomad said:
Queen Michael said:
Both of them contain sci-fi elements. Not that realistic, really.
How does realism have ANYTHING to do with whether a film is intended for an adult or children audience?

The few films that are animated that are certainly not for kids that I can think of right this minute are all unrealistic to some degree. Either by including sci-fi elements (Which aren't always totally unrealistic, just futuristic, Like A Scanner Darkly, which is certainly not for children) or by having some sort of supernatural being like a ghost or vampire or some weird hellbeasts. If these movies didn't include that little bit of unrealistic material then they could have just been made without any animation.
How about non-animated films with nonrealistic elements. Are they for kids? Total Recall? I think not.

Your arguement is extremely invalid.
I never said that movies that don't fit my criteria aren't mature/for adults. Why didn't you read my original post? "Your arguement is extremely invalid." No, because I never made that argument.
I did indeed read you're OP, but it sounds like you didn't read the title, where you are asking why are there no adult animated films, but through the OP, that question changes to why are there no animated films that fit your specific criteria.
You may not have tried to, but you did put forward the arguement that unrealistic films are not for adults? What I want to know is how can you explain that logic? It kinda baffles me to be honest.
"These rules are useless at determining if a movie is good or not, or for kids or not, or mature or not." I said that in my original post.
 

Blindswordmaster

New member
Dec 28, 2009
3,145
0
0
Queen Michael said:
Blindswordmaster said:
If the plot doesn't involve fantastic elements, then why waste time and money by animating it? One of the great points of animation is that you can draw anything! If you aren't going to take advantage of that with great visuals, then why would you bother spending the money and time animating something that could just as easily shot live action for a fraction of the cost?
then we'd lose the unique beauty of animation. That's my answer, and it's a quote from my original post. You really ought to have read it.
I did, about 5 seconds after making this post. Sorry. Question: Why are sci-fi and fantasy childish?
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
1. Are completely realistic in plot and look, that is, people have reasonably realistic proportions (animated realistic-looking people have a beauty all its own), and it doesn't contain supernatural or sci-fi concepts. No alternate timelines either, since that's a sci-fi genre. Of course, neither sf or fantasy are inherently childish. But live-action directors can create masterpieces without fantasy elements or sf elements. I'm just asking animation to do the same.

2. Include swearing where appropriate, (edit: this one isn't completely necessary. I realized that people never swear in old movies)

3. Don't sound like a kids' movie when you describe the plot. (So no talking animals, people!)

4. Aren't comedies. (Because if not all live-action movies are comedies, not all animated ones should have to be.)

Edit: 5. It has to be theoretically possible for the movie to have been based on a true story. Or in other words, it doesn't have to have been based on a true story, but it has to be the kind of film that's so realistic that it could be passed off as based on real events.

If these are your criteria for what constitutes 'mature' story telling. Then you have a lot of maturing to do.
They're not my criteria for if a movie is mature. "These rules are useless at determining if a movie is good or not, or for kids or not, or mature or not." I said that in my OP. It's a direct quote. And you say you read it. So either you didn't actually read it but claim you did, or you know that what you've written doesn't apply to my original post but you posted it anyway. I sincerely don't mean to be rude. I just honestly can't think of any other options.
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
[Why take the time to animate something that can be easily filmed?
then we'd lose the unique beauty of animation. That's my answer, and it's a quote from my original post. The post you claim to have read.

Blindswordmaster said:
Queen Michael said:
Blindswordmaster said:
If the plot doesn't involve fantastic elements, then why waste time and money by animating it? One of the great points of animation is that you can draw anything! If you aren't going to take advantage of that with great visuals, then why would you bother spending the money and time animating something that could just as easily shot live action for a fraction of the cost?
then we'd lose the unique beauty of animation. That's my answer, and it's a quote from my original post. You really ought to have read it.
I did, about 5 seconds after making this post. Sorry. Question: Why are sci-fi and fantasy childish?
They're not, I never said they were.
 

The Last Nomad

Lost in Ethiopia
Oct 28, 2009
1,426
0
0
Queen Michael said:
"These rules are useless at determining if a movie is good or not, or for kids or not, or mature or not." I said that in my original post.
Then why did you call the thread 'Why won't you accept that animated movies are only for kids?' and then name some films (which are sort of aimed at kids if you ask me, but can be enjoyed by adults) and then complaining that they are kids ideas made into adult films if you are just going to ask if films fit a completely unrelated set of criteria?
 

II2

New member
Mar 13, 2010
1,492
0
0


The animated series Aeon Flux fits the bill perfectly, and is one of the few western examples that pop to mind. Surrealist sci fi at it's best. Visionary work.



Also, published at the same time by MTV was the cartoon adaptation of the comic, The MAXX, which is very different, but no less compelling in it's own voice.

While both series have some well executed action scenes, they are cerebral shows of excellent quality, hard hitting and unsettling without succumbing to GRIM DARK. Loosely speaking AF looks more at huge scope ideas regarding the philosophical questions about humanity and technology from the point of view of the arch rival / lover protagonists, both anti heroes. The MAXX is much more of a gritty study of human relationships and imagination under extreme duress the the compounded levels of fractured emotional damage that make up the mosaic of a persons identity.
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
The Last Nomad said:
Queen Michael said:
"These rules are useless at determining if a movie is good or not, or for kids or not, or mature or not." I said that in my original post.
Then why did you call the thread 'Why won't you accept that animated movies are only for kids?' and then name some films (which are sort of aimed at kids if you ask me, but can be enjoyed by adults) and then complaining that they are kids ideas made into adult films if you are just going to ask if films fit a completely unrelated set of criteria?
I was trying to make the point that mature animated movies seem to have to be based on a childish concept, and that they rarely make ideas for films for adults into animated movies.
 

ArchAngelKira

New member
Mar 25, 2010
455
0
0
If you don't like animated movies "not" being kids movies that's just your opinion. I can see some people understand what you mean
 

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,392
0
0
If they were, even with the ones specifically meant for kids, why would they have some many references, themes, and jokes that only older people would understand?
 

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,581
0
0
Queen Michael said:
absoul11 said:
Queen Michael said:
1. Are completely realistic in plot and look, that is, people have realistic proportions and it doesn't contain supernatural or sci-fi concepts. Of course, neither sf or fantasy are inherently childish. But live-action directors can create masterpieces without fantasy elements or sf elements. I'm just asking animation to do the same.

.[/b]
I'm fine with looking realistic, but why not have sci-fi or fantasy? There are many movies (with or without it) that are amazing so should that matter? Also, what if the proportions were realistic but the colors were on the cartoonish side.
Why not have sci-fi or fantasy? Because making movies that aren't helps fight the stereotype that animation is a genre and not a look. If the proportions were realistic but the colors were on the cartoonish side? That's fine.
OP, you seem to be forgetting that Sci-Fi and Fantasy aren't necessarily "kiddie" genres. I'll slip out of the boundaries of your thread for a moment and recommend that you find some seminal SF classics. Metropolis, Blade Runner, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Soylent Green, A Clockwork Orange, the first Matrix flick, Inception, Possible Worlds... You'll notice none of them are frivolous in any way, unless you consider their themes to be frivolous. If you do, well... You'll have to remember that the human condition comes complete with the need and want to discuss things that aren't strictly in the purview of Reality with a Big R.

Considering this, these movies are pretty realistic, in a roundabout sort of way.

I understand that you have a slight beef against the fact that *animated* features use Sci-Fi or Fantasy to establish whimsical plots and universes as a rule. That's just a question of perception and of how a given movie's subject matter is handled.

Take Titan A.E., for instance. The animation is iffy as someone else said, the CGI sucks, the acting varies a lot between "passable" and "horrendous", that's all true - but the core premise is pretty damn near adult. Earth gets wiped out and Humanity becomes an endangered species that's looked at with contempt or pity by the other members of the galactic community.

Yes, it's Sci-Fi, yes it's not realistic by a long shot, but it's pretty serious when you strip the admittedly kiddie stuff away, as much as I did get a few chuckles out of John Leguizamo and Nathan Lane.

What you're essentially asking for is the sort of movie auteur film-makers would consider. It's the sort of release that earns a respectable amount of accolades from prestigious institutions (e.g. Persepolis did pretty well, if memory serves me right) - but that will never be able to break out into the mainstream audience and consequently dispel that childish aspect you seem so tired of.

For better or for worse, people *have* associated animation to harmless, childish fun. For every stunningly awesome anime out there, you'll get bucketfuls of the stuff that airs on Disney XD. For every genre-defining or genre-defying piece the West or the East will pump out, you'll get dozens more that ask that you do nothing more than turn your brain off and munch on some popcorn.

The norm, as far as adult productions go, is still low-brow humor and exploitation galore. It'll stay the norm because, unfortunately, the audience for cheap T&A or gore is always going to be bigger and more profitable than those who'd like to see something meaningful in an animated form. A lot of people go to the movies to turn their brains off, unfortunately far moreso than those who go out to the movies to *think*.

I'm in my master's degree, so my "job", so to speak, involves a lot of thought. When I pop a DVD in the tray, there's a bigger chance of it being something along the lines of Heavy Metal, rather than Persepolis. I use movies to unplug, primarily, and only check out a thinking man's movie about once or twice a year. I've got enough cogitation going on with the dozens of literary analyses and critical editions I have to go through.

Granted, of course, that's just me. Personally, after downing all of S.T. Joshi's annotated essays on H.P. Lovecraft and the last twenty years' worth of critical analyses on Stephen King, I *really* don't mind a Ralph Bakshi flick or stuff like Afro Samurai.
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
Queen Michael said:
Abandon4093 said:
[Why take the time to animate something that can be easily filmed?
then we'd lose the unique beauty of animation. That's my answer, and it's a quote from my original post. The post you claim to have read.
Yet at the same time you want to take away the stylisation that makes animation unique.

Queen Michael said:
1. Are completely realistic in plot and look, that is, people have reasonably realistic proportions (animated realistic-looking people have a beauty all its own)in your opinion
Your post, that I did read, is more than slightly contradictory.

Here. Just go watch 'The triplets of Belleville'.


It applies to most of your criteria if you ignore you ridiculous hangup on style. And before you say anything, it's neither sci-fi nor fantasy. It's surrealism.
First of all, I've got to watch that movie, it seems great. Secondly, I don't want to take away he stylisation that makes animation unique. I just wish there'd be some realistic-looking stuff as well.
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
IamLEAM1983 said:
I don't think that sf is unserious. I just think we shouldn't limit the subjects that animation tackles, since we'll miss some good movies if we do.