Why didn't you use a phoenix down?

Recommended Videos

Antidrall

New member
Mar 16, 2010
244
0
0
People keep obsessing over this whole thing in FF7, when even as a kid I was unconvinced in any relationship they had. A tank protecting a Healer in WoW has more romance than Cloud and Aeris. In the game, it basically tells you that Cloud loves Aeris because he effin' does. there is no hint to them both being attracted to each other, they basically spontaneously hold hands and talk about shit. Even if I could buy their relationship together, I can still not relate to Cloud in any way. He's annoying, basically a piece of cardboard, and once Aeris finally gets screwed in the chest, He grabs her corpse and starts whining to Sephiroth about his feelings instead of going on a godamned rampage throughout the game for killing his friend...Yeah, that's what it should have been. They should have been friends. Tifa was the one constantly standing by Cloud's side, they should have been the love story throughout the whole thing. Wouldn't that make much more sense? She would have made a man out of him.

As for the whole 'killing off Aeris', it totally comes out of nowhere, and completely shocking. but for all the wrong reasons. At the time, we had no idea what was going on and thought she was going insane. We then see her praying there for some reason and gets run through by the most impractical katana I have seen. there's bright pearly altars and floating stair steps, it was more surreal than anything. If you want a good death scene then

*Spoiler*

In Final Fantasy Tactics (the last good final fantasy game) Ramza and Delita are off to save Delita's sister, a commoner that was mistaken for a noble and kidnapped for leverage. Ramza joins because Delita could basically be considered his brother since they were raised together and Teta in turn, his sister. after facing down the Corpse brigade and defeating Wiegraf, they reach the fort where she's being held to see Ramza's brother Zalbag and cavalry arriving. Who then orders to shoot Teta and then captor. Algus (the shooter) then tells Ramza that the nobles didn't care for such commoners and that they killed her to save face. Ramza and Delita then go and fucking massacre Algus (fun fact: in the battle, Teta's body is still on the map, but won't resurect if you try a life spell or phoenix down). That death had reason, it was a very sadistic and brutal reason, but a reason nonetheless. We see later that Aeris casted the spell, so her death was just to prevent people from knowing what the hell was going on until the next 2 discs.
 

moretimethansense

New member
Apr 10, 2008
1,617
0
0
Jamboxdotcom said:
MCDeltaT said:
Today I saw another Webcomic that depicted Aeris' death and questioned "why not just use a phoenix down?" Because that isn't the point. I doubt that moment or even Final Fantasy VII would be remembered so vividly if you could simply revive Aeris and skip happily into the sunset holding hands and picking flowers.
actually, not to bash you, but that IS the point i think you're missing. yes, Aeris's death makes sense from a narrative standpoint, but from a gameplay standpoint, where death isn't permanent as long as you have enough phoenix downs, her death is pretty meaningless.
hence the humor in those jokes. from an in-game standpoint, her death is pointless. from an in-story standpoint, however, it does have meaning.

*edit* basically ninja'd by GiantRaven. "gameplay and story segregation" very nice way of putting it.
I'd just like to point out that pheonix downs NEVER restore any charachters to life from death, they simply brought a wounded/unconcios party member back in to (barely)fighting condition.
I never found the joke funny simply because the premise is so clearly flawed, if it were in a game where charachter explicitly die al la Dragon Quest it would make sense to say they should've used the appropriate item.
 

moretimethansense

New member
Apr 10, 2008
1,617
0
0
Garak73 said:
moretimethansense said:
Jamboxdotcom said:
MCDeltaT said:
Today I saw another Webcomic that depicted Aeris' death and questioned "why not just use a phoenix down?" Because that isn't the point. I doubt that moment or even Final Fantasy VII would be remembered so vividly if you could simply revive Aeris and skip happily into the sunset holding hands and picking flowers.
actually, not to bash you, but that IS the point i think you're missing. yes, Aeris's death makes sense from a narrative standpoint, but from a gameplay standpoint, where death isn't permanent as long as you have enough phoenix downs, her death is pretty meaningless.
hence the humor in those jokes. from an in-game standpoint, her death is pointless. from an in-story standpoint, however, it does have meaning.

*edit* basically ninja'd by GiantRaven. "gameplay and story segregation" very nice way of putting it.
I'd just like to point out that pheonix downs NEVER restore any charachters to life from death, they simply brought a wounded/unconcios party member back in to (barely)fighting condition.
I never found the joke funny simply because the premise is so clearly flawed, if it were in a game where charachter explicitly die al la Dragon Quest it would make sense to say they should've used the appropriate item.
I would imagine that somewhere someone has died from a death spell and been brought back with a phoenix down.
Irrelevent, all death spells do is reduce the targets health to zero, if you check the characters stats it will say something like Wounded or K.O, that said, you'd think petrifiying and then shattering someone in FFX would be a tad more permanent, in tyhat one they don't even need the pheonix down.
 

Trogdor1138

New member
May 28, 2010
1,116
0
0
D Moness said:
I keep remembering this one. It annoyes me because i really dislike Tifa >.< (that is probbaly why i keep remembering it.
I lol'd hard... Also I always preferred Tifa >_>

Also OP, this joke seems to be going to your head way too much. Just relax about it, it's kind of funny to think about it that way. It doesn't destroy the game or anything.
 

Wolfenbarg

Terrible Person
Oct 18, 2010
682
0
0
KalosCast said:
I understand that you're sick of the joke, but it's a legitimate plot-hole.

If you introduce a rule in your universe (such as an item that revives people who have sustained fatal injuries), and then an event happens that defies the rule as we know it (such as us not being able to revive someone who has sustained fatal injuries with the item), you have to explain that no longer applies.

That's just how stories work. Hell, it would have been as easy as "whoops, I left them in yesterday's pants. Sorry guys." Not well-written, but I don't collect a paycheck writing games.
Except that it isn't. In Mass Effect 2 I didn't ask the question of why Jack didn't just get back up after having been practically melted by enemy ship fire when she always got back up after a fatal injury before. There is a huge separation between gameplay and story that doesn't exist in other mediums. If I'm reading a book and someone gets shot when we have something that could heal it, that is a plot hole. However, if said healing object is never once addressed in the narrative, it has no effect on it. If the game kills you, you can come back. If the story kills you, you're done. That's true in EVERY modern game that has deaths.
 

KalosCast

New member
Dec 11, 2010
470
0
0
Wolfenbarg said:
Except that it isn't. In Mass Effect 2 I didn't ask the question of why Jack didn't just get back up after having been practically melted by enemy ship fire when she always got back up after a fatal injury before. There is a huge separation between gameplay and story that doesn't exist in other mediums. If I'm reading a book and someone gets shot when we have something that could heal it, that is a plot hole. However, if said healing object is never once addressed in the narrative, it has no effect on it. If the game kills you, you can come back. If the story kills you, you're done. That's true in EVERY modern game that has deaths.
Except that they aren't deaths in Mass Effect, you're just being wounded badly enough to be unable to fight. It's clearly established in the ME universe that when you die, you're dead. Shepard was a special case. An experimental, incredibly expensive, custom-tailored, "the machine got destroyed and that's why you can't use it again" special case.

There's the magic goo of medigel to bring up incapacitated squad members (I'm pretty sure that's the exact word they use) but that's well-established in the universe as being able to very quickly heal even very serious wounds. Whereas, when the ship gets lasered and the person in engineering dies, the ship computer reads no life-signs in engineering.

Sure, your squad-mates live through things that even kill people in the main plot... but that's why you're the one saving the universe. Is it good writing? No, not really, but at least they tried.

Hell, even if you do want to call it death "Bioware did it" doesn't make bad writing magically into good writing.

Your argument boils down to "it's not a plot hole because other games have the same plot hole" which doesn't even approach being a valid argument.
 

sheah1

New member
Jul 4, 2010
557
0
0
I think they should have worked phoenix downs into the story, KOs or not. Imagine if Cloud simply went "well I'll just use a phoenix down".... and it didn't work. Imagine him desperately holding one over her dead body, shouting "come back, come back!" or some such, I realize it wouldn't have really worked on the PS1 but, come on, wouldn't that be more emotional and make more sense? Especially if in a later battle with Sephiroth he said "oh, that, yeah, it was a new materia in my sword" or something. Would'a saved a lot of Webcomics.
 

sheah1

New member
Jul 4, 2010
557
0
0
Antidrall said:
People keep obsessing over this whole thing in FF7, when even as a kid I was unconvinced in any relationship they had. A tank protecting a Healer in WoW has more romance than Cloud and Aeris. In the game, it basically tells you that Cloud loves Aeris because he effin' does. there is no hint to them both being attracted to each other, they basically spontaneously hold hands and talk about shit. Even if I could buy their relationship together, I can still not relate to Cloud in any way. He's annoying, basically a piece of cardboard, and once Aeris finally gets screwed in the chest, He grabs her corpse and starts whining to Sephiroth about his feelings instead of going on a godamned rampage throughout the game for killing his friend...Yeah, that's what it should have been. They should have been friends. Tifa was the one constantly standing by Cloud's side, they should have been the love story throughout the whole thing. Wouldn't that make much more sense? She would have made a man out of him.

As for the whole 'killing off Aeris', it totally comes out of nowhere, and completely shocking. but for all the wrong reasons. At the time, we had no idea what was going on and thought she was going insane. We then see her praying there for some reason and gets run through by the most impractical katana I have seen. there's bright pearly altars and floating stair steps, it was more surreal than anything. If you want a good death scene then

*Spoiler*

In Final Fantasy Tactics (the last good final fantasy game) Ramza and Delita are off to save Delita's sister, a commoner that was mistaken for a noble and kidnapped for leverage. Ramza joins because Delita could basically be considered his brother since they were raised together and Teta in turn, his sister. after facing down the Corpse brigade and defeating Wiegraf, they reach the fort where she's being held to see Ramza's brother Zalbag and cavalry arriving. Who then orders to shoot Teta and then captor. Algus (the shooter) then tells Ramza that the nobles didn't care for such commoners and that they killed her to save face. Ramza and Delita then go and fucking massacre Algus (fun fact: in the battle, Teta's body is still on the map, but won't resurect if you try a life spell or phoenix down). That death had reason, it was a very sadistic and brutal reason, but a reason nonetheless. We see later that Aeris casted the spell, so her death was just to prevent people from knowing what the hell was going on until the next 2 discs.
Just because you mentioned tactics......
"ok, attack Mustadio.....PHOENIX DOWN, PHOENIX DOWN! WHERE IS THE PHOENIX DOWN?!"
 

Wolfenbarg

Terrible Person
Oct 18, 2010
682
0
0
KalosCast said:
Wolfenbarg said:
Except that it isn't. In Mass Effect 2 I didn't ask the question of why Jack didn't just get back up after having been practically melted by enemy ship fire when she always got back up after a fatal injury before. There is a huge separation between gameplay and story that doesn't exist in other mediums. If I'm reading a book and someone gets shot when we have something that could heal it, that is a plot hole. However, if said healing object is never once addressed in the narrative, it has no effect on it. If the game kills you, you can come back. If the story kills you, you're done. That's true in EVERY modern game that has deaths.
Except that they aren't deaths in Mass Effect, you're just being wounded badly enough to be unable to fight. It's clearly established in the ME universe that when you die, you're dead. Shepard was a special case. An experimental, incredibly expensive, custom-tailored, "the machine got destroyed and that's why you can't use it again" special case.

There's the magic goo of medigel to bring up incapacitated squad members (I'm pretty sure that's the exact word they use) but that's well-established in the universe as being able to very quickly heal even very serious wounds. Whereas, when the ship gets lasered and the person in engineering dies, the ship computer reads no life-signs in engineering.

Sure, your squad-mates live through things that even kill people in the main plot... but that's why you're the one saving the universe. Is it good writing? No, not really, but at least they tried.

Hell, even if you do want to call it death "Bioware did it" doesn't make bad writing magically into good writing.

Your argument boils down to "it's not a plot hole because other games have the same plot hole" which doesn't even approach being a valid argument.
If that is suddenly called bad writing, then practically every game that had the story call for a death has bad writing. It isn't even possible at this point for every gameplay mechanic to be part of the story. How often does a simple slash actually wound a character in gameplay? It lowers hitpoints, but it sure doesn't slow anyone down. However, once you get into a cutscene someone getting slashed is a serious injury. Unless we want developers to start telling stories in the same way Fable 2 does, this isn't bad writing. It's standard fare.
 

Mr Pantomime

New member
Jul 10, 2010
1,650
0
0
blakfayt said:
Mr Pantomime said:
Lukeman1884 said:
Mr Pantomime said:
Phoenix Downs are for reviving KO'd people, not dead ones. Its the same as Pokemon, characters get knocked out when they get to 0hp. Honestly, it says it in the description.
In that case, the various "death" magics in FF seem like misnomers.
Thats a good point. Though im not sure the creators put too much thought into it.
It works on D&D rules, KO=0hp Dead =-amounts of HP, you just can't hit KOed people, and death only drops them to 0.
Ah D&D, the answer to all random and unimportant problems. Makes sense though.
 

Silva

New member
Apr 13, 2009
1,122
0
0
The same reason why getting cut by a gigantic sword in the game doesn't kill you instantly in battle.

Gameplay is different from story. Story allows people to die, gameplay allows you to reload at the nearest checkpoint. Gameplay has phoenix downs, story has permanent deaths. It has been this way in gaming for aeons.

It's still pretty badly handled in RPGs like Final Fantasy though. Really, the whole "KOed" versus "killed" technicality argument doesn't work because it's called a Phoenix Down, not a Wake Up Potion. Phoenixes rise from the dead. Not from being tired on Sunday morning or getting punched out by Mike Tyson. From the dead.

So of course it's awkward. Of course people ruined this big emotional scene for themselves by thinking "they could just, you know, use this item". If it's set off this many reactions and it could've been avoided, then Square should change it for the next game. But do they? No. And there's my main problem with Square's design philosophy.

"If it's broken, don't fix it." Greeeat. See you in five years, when you're not selling as many copies of Androgynous Protagonist Fights Demons of Own Making for Redemption. Oh wait. I'm confused, that's right now, for a reason.

Rage aside, yes it's an overly common joke that's not so funny anymore. But it is recurring because this flaw keeps coming up in every FF game in which someone dies (in other words, every time). The joke isn't old, the flaw it's there to point out is. And therein lies my beef with the complaint.
 

Hookman

New member
Jul 2, 2008
1,328
0
0
No ones denying that it adds to the story. The thing most people have a problem is that her death defies the logic that the makers of the game created and its so obvious that I'm surpised they didn't spot the error during the development of the game.
 

Reallink

New member
Feb 17, 2011
197
0
0
I'm pretty sure that death not actually killing can be hand waved when you consider how ridiculously the characters were jacked up on Materia. It made them strong enough to withstand death and only got knocked out instead? I don't know, but that will do.

If nothing else the death is pretty much also a depiction of how strong Sephiroth is at that point relative to the main party. He can actually kill someone. So it subverts the *main party can't die* idea purely because he is THAT STRONG.
 

Valiard

New member
Feb 26, 2009
123
0
0
why not say that it was the black materia...just say something to the effect that black materia just boots your soul straight to the lifestream....no life spell no phoenix down...just dead...

there that wasn't too hard was it?