Why do I think this book i'm writing is turning out bad?

Recommended Videos

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
dathwampeer said:
It reads more like direction for a game than a book.

You need to be more emotive in what you're saying. Don't be so matter of fact about things. It really dissociates us from the characters. They seem more like auto scripts than humans in an adrenaline filled battle situation.

case in point said:
Prepare yourself. The convoy will be here in 30 seconds." Lieutenant said on the radio.

I stationed myself behind a sandbag with a few other militia soldiers.

Moments later, Scout ships arrived overhead.

"HERE THEY ARE!" The militia leader yelled.
Why not try

Something like said:
"The convoy's en-rout. Prepare for contact." The lieutenant bellowed down the coms unit as he stumbled to cover.

The cracking of gunfire above my head tore down what little remained of my resolve as I made a break to the tantalising promise of safety that the sandbags held. Where my fellow militia huddled, preparing for the onslaught that was approaching with unwelcome haste.

I'd barely managed to regain my composure as the unmistakable roar of a scoutships engines ripped the airs countenance from above my head. The malignant form blacked out the sun, as if an omen, looming over all of us.

Somehow, over the sizzling cry of the thrusters, I heard a fear laced voice shout out "They're here!"
I dunno. I'm not a writer, I don't even know enough about the situation to characterise properly. And I don't really know any accurate military jargon.

But you certainly need to give the characters more life. Convey emotions in them, through the narrators voice. And add more detail to the world by giving tid bits of info with everything that's being said. Don't make it so matter of fact.

But any way.

Isn't this story.... kinda like Homefront?
Hmmm... your version is a bit too flashy, I'm affraid readers will have to have a dictionary by them while reading it, but I do get your point. I will try to add some flare outside of the quotes. (They usually try to keep it simple in battle, but I agree his discriptions can be more colorful)

So how about this?
"Prepair yourself, the convoy will be here in 30 seconds" Lieutenant solumly wispered into his radio, sounding as if he feared it would be the last sentance to ever leave his mouth.

I ran to cover against a sandbag, surrounded by a few militia soldiers clad in woodland camoflauge and wearing paintball masks... I never got why we wore those, They couldn't stop bullets, and they made your head uncomftorable. I looked to the bland grey skies, and I saw it. Several Nazi scout ships hovering to our possition, Their black shells made the sky look even darker, and they red LPainting on them perfectly finished the "We are evil pricks" effect. The nazi soldiers began to rappel down Near our possition. I readied my rifle for battle.
That is what it will be like in the second run, but with proper grammer and stuff like that. I plan to expand on more things, and add some imagery to it.

I wouldn't say it is anything like homefront. The Nazi's don't control america, but america is fighting with 40/60 odds against them.
His version isn't too flashy, it's actually pretty solid prose wise. Considering your subject matter I wouldn't go overly simplistic, it ain't for kids. My one piece of advice? Don't be afraid to scrap and re-purpose ideas. I don't think I am still using a single concept I had when I was 14 for my own writing
 

Averant

New member
Jul 6, 2010
452
0
0
believer258 said:
Averant said:
That's all, I think. Gotta hand it to you, writing something like this at 14 is not something many can do. I can hardly do it myself, and when I tried I shelved my book because I knew I had neither the time, the resources, nor the patience/motivation to keep it going. So if you manage to succeed, you're already well ahead of most writers. Hell, the Eragon author wrote said book at 16. Something to live up to.
Not to brag or anything, but... well, yeah, I'm bragging, I wrote a full book in 1st grade. On paper. I just couldn't get the freakin' idea out of my head, it was literally all I could think about! If only I could write with such vigor now, I could have finished what I've been thinking about...
Like I said. Not MANY could do it. Out of curiosity, was it published?
 

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
Simriel said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
dathwampeer said:
It reads more like direction for a game than a book.

You need to be more emotive in what you're saying. Don't be so matter of fact about things. It really dissociates us from the characters. They seem more like auto scripts than humans in an adrenaline filled battle situation.

case in point said:
Prepare yourself. The convoy will be here in 30 seconds." Lieutenant said on the radio.

I stationed myself behind a sandbag with a few other militia soldiers.

Moments later, Scout ships arrived overhead.

"HERE THEY ARE!" The militia leader yelled.
Why not try

Something like said:
"The convoy's en-rout. Prepare for contact." The lieutenant bellowed down the coms unit as he stumbled to cover.

The cracking of gunfire above my head tore down what little remained of my resolve as I made a break to the tantalising promise of safety that the sandbags held. Where my fellow militia huddled, preparing for the onslaught that was approaching with unwelcome haste.

I'd barely managed to regain my composure as the unmistakable roar of a scoutships engines ripped the airs countenance from above my head. The malignant form blacked out the sun, as if an omen, looming over all of us.

Somehow, over the sizzling cry of the thrusters, I heard a fear laced voice shout out "They're here!"
I dunno. I'm not a writer, I don't even know enough about the situation to characterise properly. And I don't really know any accurate military jargon.

But you certainly need to give the characters more life. Convey emotions in them, through the narrators voice. And add more detail to the world by giving tid bits of info with everything that's being said. Don't make it so matter of fact.

But any way.

Isn't this story.... kinda like Homefront?
Hmmm... your version is a bit too flashy, I'm affraid readers will have to have a dictionary by them while reading it, but I do get your point. I will try to add some flare outside of the quotes. (They usually try to keep it simple in battle, but I agree his discriptions can be more colorful)

So how about this?
"Prepair yourself, the convoy will be here in 30 seconds" Lieutenant solumly wispered into his radio, sounding as if he feared it would be the last sentance to ever leave his mouth.

I ran to cover against a sandbag, surrounded by a few militia soldiers clad in woodland camoflauge and wearing paintball masks... I never got why we wore those, They couldn't stop bullets, and they made your head uncomftorable. I looked to the bland grey skies, and I saw it. Several Nazi scout ships hovering to our possition, Their black shells made the sky look even darker, and they red LPainting on them perfectly finished the "We are evil pricks" effect. The nazi soldiers began to rappel down Near our possition. I readied my rifle for battle.
That is what it will be like in the second run, but with proper grammer and stuff like that. I plan to expand on more things, and add some imagery to it.

I wouldn't say it is anything like homefront. The Nazi's don't control america, but america is fighting with 40/60 odds against them.
His version isn't too flashy, it's actually pretty solid prose wise. Considering your subject matter I wouldn't go overly simplistic, it ain't for kids. My one piece of advice? Don't be afraid to scrap and re-purpose ideas. I don't think I am still using a single concept I had when I was 14 for my own writing
But then again, it isn't for an uptight reader either, It needs some destressing in it, and I don't what to be too flashy in it, this isn't some uber super classic novel.
 

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
Though I apparently didn't provide enough back story with the character. Militia soldiers are the equivalent of the army. They are well trained, and the best of all of them to cope with bloody and death defying situations was John. He has little pity for the enemy, the ruined his life, and he wants revenge. He shows fear of death, and sometimes feels bad about killing, especially after battle. But he knows it is necessary to get his life back. He views his killing as retribution for the millions of innocent that were killed.
Your understanding of what an actual militia is is false, and your main character is practically choking on cliches and contradictions.
They are refered to as a militia because they are normal people off the street, trained for battle. They don't belong to any major fighting force, because contact to the army and the navy was lost at the begining. They retraced there roots to freedom, and called themselves a militia, like in the revolutionary war. He controdicts himself because he is like one of those jawbrakers that can change flavor, on the outside, he is a grim pessimistic person, inside he has a heart, and cares about people, 3rd lair, he is almost purly evil, 3rd lair is only shown in the 3rd installment.
 

AntonicKnight

New member
Feb 9, 2011
92
0
0
Almost forgot!
The entire someone invades America theme is kinda overused.I suggest some changes in the stories background.
P.S Militia is a formation of untrained civilians drafted into the army in times of extreme threat the the nations security.....trust me kid i know about these things.
 

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
AntonicKnight said:
Almost forgot!
The entire someone invades America theme is kinda overused.I suggest some changes in the stories background.
P.S Militia is a formation of untrained civilians drafted into the army in times of extreme threat the the nations security.....trust me kid i know about these things.
Like several other things in the book, they are refered that way for a spacific reason- They are fighting to keep freedom, they are not the army, navy, marines, or airforce, so they retraced the roots of american freedomfighters, and named themselves the militia.
 

Simriel

The Count of Monte Cristo
Dec 22, 2008
2,485
0
0
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
Simriel said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
dathwampeer said:
It reads more like direction for a game than a book.

You need to be more emotive in what you're saying. Don't be so matter of fact about things. It really dissociates us from the characters. They seem more like auto scripts than humans in an adrenaline filled battle situation.

case in point said:
Prepare yourself. The convoy will be here in 30 seconds." Lieutenant said on the radio.

I stationed myself behind a sandbag with a few other militia soldiers.

Moments later, Scout ships arrived overhead.

"HERE THEY ARE!" The militia leader yelled.
Why not try

Something like said:
"The convoy's en-rout. Prepare for contact." The lieutenant bellowed down the coms unit as he stumbled to cover.

The cracking of gunfire above my head tore down what little remained of my resolve as I made a break to the tantalising promise of safety that the sandbags held. Where my fellow militia huddled, preparing for the onslaught that was approaching with unwelcome haste.

I'd barely managed to regain my composure as the unmistakable roar of a scoutships engines ripped the airs countenance from above my head. The malignant form blacked out the sun, as if an omen, looming over all of us.

Somehow, over the sizzling cry of the thrusters, I heard a fear laced voice shout out "They're here!"
I dunno. I'm not a writer, I don't even know enough about the situation to characterise properly. And I don't really know any accurate military jargon.

But you certainly need to give the characters more life. Convey emotions in them, through the narrators voice. And add more detail to the world by giving tid bits of info with everything that's being said. Don't make it so matter of fact.

But any way.

Isn't this story.... kinda like Homefront?
Hmmm... your version is a bit too flashy, I'm affraid readers will have to have a dictionary by them while reading it, but I do get your point. I will try to add some flare outside of the quotes. (They usually try to keep it simple in battle, but I agree his discriptions can be more colorful)

So how about this?
"Prepair yourself, the convoy will be here in 30 seconds" Lieutenant solumly wispered into his radio, sounding as if he feared it would be the last sentance to ever leave his mouth.

I ran to cover against a sandbag, surrounded by a few militia soldiers clad in woodland camoflauge and wearing paintball masks... I never got why we wore those, They couldn't stop bullets, and they made your head uncomftorable. I looked to the bland grey skies, and I saw it. Several Nazi scout ships hovering to our possition, Their black shells made the sky look even darker, and they red LPainting on them perfectly finished the "We are evil pricks" effect. The nazi soldiers began to rappel down Near our possition. I readied my rifle for battle.
That is what it will be like in the second run, but with proper grammer and stuff like that. I plan to expand on more things, and add some imagery to it.

I wouldn't say it is anything like homefront. The Nazi's don't control america, but america is fighting with 40/60 odds against them.
His version isn't too flashy, it's actually pretty solid prose wise. Considering your subject matter I wouldn't go overly simplistic, it ain't for kids. My one piece of advice? Don't be afraid to scrap and re-purpose ideas. I don't think I am still using a single concept I had when I was 14 for my own writing
But then again, it isn't for an uptight reader either, It needs some destressing in it, and I don't what to be too flashy in it, this isn't some uber super classic novel.
An Uptight reader? Unless the prose grab a publishers eye right away they will just take it and throw it in the 'No' pile. Thats kinda how these things work
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
Though I apparently didn't provide enough back story with the character. Militia soldiers are the equivalent of the army. They are well trained, and the best of all of them to cope with bloody and death defying situations was John. He has little pity for the enemy, the ruined his life, and he wants revenge. He shows fear of death, and sometimes feels bad about killing, especially after battle. But he knows it is necessary to get his life back. He views his killing as retribution for the millions of innocent that were killed.
Your understanding of what an actual militia is is false, and your main character is practically choking on cliches and contradictions.
They are refered to as a militia because they are normal people off the street, trained for battle. They don't belong to any major fighting force, because contact to the army and the navy was lost at the begining. They retraced there roots to freedom, and called themselves a militia, like in the revolutionary war. He controdicts himself because he is like one of those jawbrakers that can change flavor, on the outside, he is a grim pessimistic person, inside he has a heart, and cares about people, 3rd lair, he is almost purly evil, 3rd lair is only shown in the 3rd installment.
To claim a militia, let alone one set up mid war, and that they are 'well trained,' is unlikely. Your OP also seems to show a high level of supply barely justified by a militia force.

Like I said before, you may want to study the military, and by extension, militias (Not those cult ones).

As for your character... I stand by my statement.
 

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
believer258 said:
Averant said:
believer258 said:
Averant said:
That's all, I think. Gotta hand it to you, writing something like this at 14 is not something many can do. I can hardly do it myself, and when I tried I shelved my book because I knew I had neither the time, the resources, nor the patience/motivation to keep it going. So if you manage to succeed, you're already well ahead of most writers. Hell, the Eragon author wrote said book at 16. Something to live up to.
Not to brag or anything, but... well, yeah, I'm bragging, I wrote a full book in 1st grade. On paper. I just couldn't get the freakin' idea out of my head, it was literally all I could think about! If only I could write with such vigor now, I could have finished what I've been thinking about...
Like I said. Not MANY could do it. Out of curiosity, was it published?
Oh, Lord no. I can tell you that it was grammatically correct and simple and clear in its wording (this is something that I've always been able to do, even then), and I can tell you that it was about a particular teacher at a school who was a sort of lava monster in disguise. She eventually made a volcano pop up in the middle of a city, and the two main characters went and saved the day by throwing a bucket of water on her. Yes, it was a horrible story, and I don't remember all the details, but I did manage to gather enough material out of it for around 60 pages.

Stupid, stupid, stupid me stopped writing in Middle School because I was trying to fit in and I thought it "wasn't cool". I didn't read much either, and now I'm behind the times. So while I can pull that aforementioned brag, I then feel bad because I was stupid. What a shame, too.
Well if you can do it in first grade, why can't I now? I HATE GRAMMAMAR! IT R MAH SWORN ENEMES!
 

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
Though I apparently didn't provide enough back story with the character. Militia soldiers are the equivalent of the army. They are well trained, and the best of all of them to cope with bloody and death defying situations was John. He has little pity for the enemy, the ruined his life, and he wants revenge. He shows fear of death, and sometimes feels bad about killing, especially after battle. But he knows it is necessary to get his life back. He views his killing as retribution for the millions of innocent that were killed.
Your understanding of what an actual militia is is false, and your main character is practically choking on cliches and contradictions.
They are refered to as a militia because they are normal people off the street, trained for battle. They don't belong to any major fighting force, because contact to the army and the navy was lost at the begining. They retraced there roots to freedom, and called themselves a militia, like in the revolutionary war. He controdicts himself because he is like one of those jawbrakers that can change flavor, on the outside, he is a grim pessimistic person, inside he has a heart, and cares about people, 3rd lair, he is almost purly evil, 3rd lair is only shown in the 3rd installment.
To claim a militia, let alone one set up mid war, and that they are 'well trained,' is unlikely. Your OP also seems to show a high level of supply barely justified by a militia force.

Like I said before, you may want to study the military, and by extension, militias (Not those cult ones).

As for your character... I stand by my statement.
1- Yes they were trained mid war, but it was before the invasion. (Most of them, anyway)
2- And I stand by my personality I gave him.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
Though I apparently didn't provide enough back story with the character. Militia soldiers are the equivalent of the army. They are well trained, and the best of all of them to cope with bloody and death defying situations was John. He has little pity for the enemy, the ruined his life, and he wants revenge. He shows fear of death, and sometimes feels bad about killing, especially after battle. But he knows it is necessary to get his life back. He views his killing as retribution for the millions of innocent that were killed.
Your understanding of what an actual militia is is false, and your main character is practically choking on cliches and contradictions.
They are refereed to as a militia because they are normal people off the street, trained for battle. They don't belong to any major fighting force, because contact to the army and the navy was lost at the beginning. They retraced there roots to freedom, and called themselves a militia, like in the revolutionary war. He contradicts himself because he is like one of those jawbreakers that can change flavor, on the outside, he is a grim pessimistic person, inside he has a heart, and cares about people, 3rd lair, he is almost purely evil, 3rd lair is only shown in the 3rd installment.
To claim a militia, let alone one set up mid war, and that they are 'well trained,' is unlikely. Your OP also seems to show a high level of supply barely justified by a militia force.

Like I said before, you may want to study the military, and by extension, militias (Not those cult ones).

As for your character... I stand by my statement.

1- Yes they were trained mid war, but it was before the invasion. (Most of them, anyway)
2- And I stand by my personality I gave him.
...Why would someone form a militia to fight an invasion that hadn't happened yet?
 

LadyRhian

New member
May 13, 2010
1,246
0
0
I have to agree with a lot of the other posters here. Keep writing. Even if you run out of ideas/impetus to write what you are writing now, just noodle around a bit with writing something else. Sometimes the physical act of writing will fire up the idea cannon and you can bring what you are noodling with back around to your original idea.

That being said, Socialism and Fascism are not the same thing, and not even strongly aligned. Check out the definitions and define what the enemies believe. If you want to name them something, you can go the abbreviation route (Ispies- pronounced ISs-pees) for the ISP, or even something based on what they wear. Blackshirts or Red Bands or the Steel Gauntlet Brigade.

Your writing is too passive. Your verbs are passive and make the whole fight sound uninteresting. Your hero is not really reacting to what is going on. You mention his HUD, why not mention it in the battle? He's shooting troops when he notices a lot of enemy combatant pings coming in from the north side of the battlefield... are they seeking to trap the US militia troops in a pincer attack, or is it just an enemy wave that dropped a little further away finally making it to the battle? You say he hates these guys he's fighting. So under that calm veneer, is he rejoicing every time he drops an enemy soldier? Or is he trying to eliminate their faces, so he puts extra head shots into them even though he might have already killed them with other shots?

Consider looking up some actual military jargon, like LT for Lieutenant. Your six for your back, and so on. It will give it more of a veneer of authenticity. "Watch your six, Verner!"

Other than that, spellcheck is your friend, if you don't spell very well. And on your off time, read some actual military fiction, like Richard Marcinko, Tom Clancy, Bernard Cornwell...
 

MASTACHIEFPWN

Will fight you and lose
Mar 27, 2010
2,279
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
Though I apparently didn't provide enough back story with the character. Militia soldiers are the equivalent of the army. They are well trained, and the best of all of them to cope with bloody and death defying situations was John. He has little pity for the enemy, the ruined his life, and he wants revenge. He shows fear of death, and sometimes feels bad about killing, especially after battle. But he knows it is necessary to get his life back. He views his killing as retribution for the millions of innocent that were killed.
Your understanding of what an actual militia is is false, and your main character is practically choking on cliches and contradictions.
They are refered to as a militia because they are normal people off the street, trained for battle. They don't belong to any major fighting force, because contact to the army and the navy was lost at the begining. They retraced there roots to freedom, and called themselves a militia, like in the revolutionary war. He controdicts himself because he is like one of those jawbrakers that can change flavor, on the outside, he is a grim pessimistic person, inside he has a heart, and cares about people, 3rd lair, he is almost purly evil, 3rd lair is only shown in the 3rd installment.
To claim a militia, let alone one set up mid war, and that they are 'well trained,' is unlikely. Your OP also seems to show a high level of supply barely justified by a militia force.

Like I said before, you may want to study the military, and by extension, militias (Not those cult ones).

As for your character... I stand by my statement.

1- Yes they were trained mid war, but it was before the invasion. (Most of them, anyway)
2- And I stand by my personality I gave him.
...Why would someone form a militia to fight an invasion that hadn't happened yet?
For chrissakes, they aren't a militia, they are named that. Because senaters would not accept going to war with the invaders while they were caught up in asia and africa, the Military commanders took preimptive steps to assure freedom.
 

Bobbity

New member
Mar 17, 2010
1,659
0
0
Alrighty, constructive criticism.
I'll ignore grammatical and spelling errors, because they're problems that are easily fixed. Instead, I'll pick out passages I think need work, and try and contribute some tips on writing in general, as well.
John was in love long before World War III started, and his life was only kept together by his love, his parents died at a young age. He took place in one of the bloodies battles of the invasion, and lived to tell his heroic tale, though he kept it mostly to himself, not wanting to be honored when so many others gave their lives.
This paragraph that describes John paints him as a pretty cliché character. I know that it's a summary, but it could still use a bit of work. The determined, selfless and stalwart defender of the land is kind of overused these days. I'm not suggesting that you have to give your character an interesting twist - although it might help - but rather that in order to overcome the cliché, you're going to want to really flesh out his character. Make him as real and lifelike as possible. Why is he fighting? Is he simply a man to do as he's told? Is he fighting for the love of his nation? Has he ever considered that he might be fighting a losing battle, and that surrender to stop the bloodshed might not be the better option?
Also, try never to dump that much information on a reader during the actual story - let it come out slowly, through the words and actions of the characters, rather than through narrative exposition.

Anyway, onto the battles themselves. Action sequences are actually surprisingly difficult to write, because you're trying to portray what's happening cleanly and effectively, without muddling your writing. Try and set the scene by describing the scenery, so we have a rough idea of what the battlefield looks like.
""Prepare yourself. The convoy will be here in 30 seconds." Lieutenant said on the radio.

I positioned myself behind a sandbag with a few other militia soldiers.
Something like this, for instance, could use some work. Where are we? The ruins of a city? A deserted grassy plain? A secluded base in the mountains? What were the soldiers doing; how do they feel about the coming battle? Are they nervous? Excited?
You need to describe the scene as best you possibly can. Even smells and sounds can contribute to the overall effectiveness of a scene, if used well.

Instead of telling us what's happening, imagine you've been asked to describe everything going on in a movie. Not only do you have to take into account actions, but also quite literally everything else. Also, just a minor thing, but don't use caps or digits when you write. They detract from the effectiveness of your work, and seem gimmicky.

Several soldiers dropped from the ship. I turned my rifle's safety off, and prepared to fire.
I pulled back my trigger with full force. My rifle began shooting out bullet after bullet.
The least fortunate ones fell right between my iron sights. Falling soon after.
You're being really clinical about what's happening here. I'd recommend reading a couple more books to get a feel for the flow of a battle - Tom Clancy's 'Red Storm Rising' would be pretty good for that - but if you really want to launch right in, use more adjectives. Those lines don't really flow very well, and you could make it much better with a slightly different choice of words. For the middle line, you could try something like: "My finger curled around the trigger, and I let go a quick burst. The kick was strong, but not unexpected. Taking aim at one particular soldier, I fired again. No smile crossed my face, however, as his corpse struck the ground. More and more men fell, impacting with the ground at tremendous speed, but many more remained alive in the air; their chutes deployed, and firing wildly into our ranks."

That wasn't great, I know, but it's an improvement on the lines you've put up. Maybe keep a war book on hand for inspiration when it comes to battle scenes, in order to make the writing a little bit easier. Anyway, I've gone on too long already, but just try to keep in mind that you really need to let your sentences flow, and to keep your descriptions as vivid as possible. Try and talk about the chaos of the battlefield, and keep up a real sensation of fear, death, disgust, hatred, or whatever emotion you think would be most appropriate.

TL;DR
More descriptions, more passion in your writing, and more detail. Maybe go read some Tom Clancy or the like, because he's pretty much got this genre down to an art.
 

KiqJaq

New member
Mar 3, 2011
12
0
0
The use of caps to display shouting is woefully tacky. I weep for what the internet has done to society's collective writing ability.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
AccursedTheory said:
MASTACHIEFPWN said:
Though I apparently didn't provide enough back story with the character. Militia soldiers are the equivalent of the army. They are well trained, and the best of all of them to cope with bloody and death defying situations was John. He has little pity for the enemy, the ruined his life, and he wants revenge. He shows fear of death, and sometimes feels bad about killing, especially after battle. But he knows it is necessary to get his life back. He views his killing as retribution for the millions of innocent that were killed.
Your understanding of what an actual militia is is false, and your main character is practically choking on cliches and contradictions.
They are refered to as a militia because they are normal people off the street, trained for battle. They don't belong to any major fighting force, because contact to the army and the navy was lost at the begining. They retraced there roots to freedom, and called themselves a militia, like in the revolutionary war. He controdicts himself because he is like one of those jawbrakers that can change flavor, on the outside, he is a grim pessimistic person, inside he has a heart, and cares about people, 3rd lair, he is almost purly evil, 3rd lair is only shown in the 3rd installment.
To claim a militia, let alone one set up mid war, and that they are 'well trained,' is unlikely. Your OP also seems to show a high level of supply barely justified by a militia force.

Like I said before, you may want to study the military, and by extension, militias (Not those cult ones).

As for your character... I stand by my statement.

1- Yes they were trained mid war, but it was before the invasion. (Most of them, anyway)
2- And I stand by my personality I gave him.
...Why would someone form a militia to fight an invasion that hadn't happened yet?
For chrissakes, they aren't a militia, they are named that. Because senaters would not accept going to war with the invaders while they were caught up in asia and africa, the Military commanders took preimptive steps to assure freedom.
...What?

Your premises is making less and less sense. The Military formed a civilian army of Americans to fight off invaders that hadn't invaded yet because Congress (Who can't stop the defense of the nation. They can only stop offensive actions against other nations) said 'We can't defend ourselves because we're too busy playing in Asia?'

That's called the United States Army.
 

Ellen of Kitten

New member
Nov 30, 2010
461
0
0
Pimppeter2 said:
Basic grammar rules and structure have been completely ignored in your excerpt.

Also, appropriate ways of showing emphasis are through using bold[/i] and italics. Using Caps locks just makes you sound like a moron.

Out of curiosity, how old are you?


Ouch OUCH. You have good advice, but the way you insult the poor guy makes you sound like an jerk. See, this is not constructive criticism. :( This is just criticism. Here's how you might have delivered the same message with less ass.

Bizzarro Pimppeter2 said:
It looks like your grammar and structure could use some work. If you're a student, you can take this to an english teacher to help you with that. How old are you?

Caps lock isn't a good way to show emphasis. The norm is using bold, or italics.
You see how that's helpful? Turns out the guy is 14. That's not even high school, if I'm not mistaken. He's trying his hand at writing, and should be helped to succeed, not berated for easily fixed errors. Even if you didn't know he was 14, you had a feeling he was young from his writing. You can deliver the same message of education using less negativity, and he will benefit from it more.

Consider this constructive criticism on how you criticize others.
 

blue spartan 11

New member
Oct 13, 2009
207
0
0
Small piece of advice for the fighting sequences: Flesh them out. A simple "I shot him in the neck." is not enough. Give more details. Exemple: "I aimed down the sight and squeezed the trigger. A splash of red rewarded my efforts. The body of the soldier fell to the ground, a hole in the neck.". You want your reader to imagine it in details. It can be quite hard at first, but when you get the hang of it, everything feels more real.

Writing is hard. Keep working and it will eventually pay off.