I'm curious what the rest of you have to say about these questions because I've been thinking about 'em a lot lately and I honestly don't think I can answer them. A book has never changed my life in any meaningful way. A video game has never made me empathize with its characters. A comic book has never empowered me. I wasn't moved by those scenes in Spec Ops or Heavy Rain or The Walking Dead. The only modicum of enjoyment I take from storytelling is in sating my curiosity in finding out how authors resolve their plots, but since so much fiction is so similar, especially mainstream content, I can almost always figure out where something's going to go within the first fifteen to twenty minutes. I imagine feel much like anyone else does when they watch one of those terrible romance movies from the '40s; you know the man and woman will meet, fall in love, get pissed at one another, reconcile, and live happily ever after with fifty good Christian kids who all smoke Winstons. Culture is no less predictable to me today. And even when it is, the pleasure isn't all that intense.
The vast majority of stories, even among the best ones, are unreliable for the dissemination of information. You can't trust facts or most ideas shared in fictional works because important details and reality itself are frequently overlooked in service of the story itself. This ranges from topics as diverse as historic accounts, to the mechanics of lockpicking, to the emotional states of survivors, to, well, everything. The best that fictional stories can offer in this regard is the essence of an experience, the likes of which could easily be derived through a few moments of thought or glancing at the headlines in a web search. In other words, stories are godawful teachers.
Storytelling is also a dubious source of morality. On what grounds do entertainers deign to teach us their non-expert life lessons? Why on Earth should we listen to them? How can you take them seriously when the limitations of entertainment media prevent them from fully discussing anything in depth?
Some people say that storytellers simply archive their environment, perhaps tinting it with their own perspective. But I'm already a part of that environment, interacting with it directly is a much better means of exploring it. And I just don't care about, and probably can't trust, their perspectives anyway.
So if it's nothing that obvious, what am I missing? Am I without the capacity to appreciate something or is it really just not there? Am a sociopath? I have a sneaking suspicion that I'm missing something but, without a frame of reference, I have no idea what it is, or if it is, for that matter. The thought that keeps coming back to me is that this is what it would be like for someone who doesn't feel the rhythm of music in their body. But you can't miss what you've never had, you can barely even imagine it, so...
...just what does a story mean to you?
The vast majority of stories, even among the best ones, are unreliable for the dissemination of information. You can't trust facts or most ideas shared in fictional works because important details and reality itself are frequently overlooked in service of the story itself. This ranges from topics as diverse as historic accounts, to the mechanics of lockpicking, to the emotional states of survivors, to, well, everything. The best that fictional stories can offer in this regard is the essence of an experience, the likes of which could easily be derived through a few moments of thought or glancing at the headlines in a web search. In other words, stories are godawful teachers.
Storytelling is also a dubious source of morality. On what grounds do entertainers deign to teach us their non-expert life lessons? Why on Earth should we listen to them? How can you take them seriously when the limitations of entertainment media prevent them from fully discussing anything in depth?
Some people say that storytellers simply archive their environment, perhaps tinting it with their own perspective. But I'm already a part of that environment, interacting with it directly is a much better means of exploring it. And I just don't care about, and probably can't trust, their perspectives anyway.
So if it's nothing that obvious, what am I missing? Am I without the capacity to appreciate something or is it really just not there? Am a sociopath? I have a sneaking suspicion that I'm missing something but, without a frame of reference, I have no idea what it is, or if it is, for that matter. The thought that keeps coming back to me is that this is what it would be like for someone who doesn't feel the rhythm of music in their body. But you can't miss what you've never had, you can barely even imagine it, so...
...just what does a story mean to you?