The games on both consoles are the same price.Sevre90210 said:It's expensive, to really enjoy the graphics you need a HDTV, the games are expensive too.
The games on both consoles are the same price.Sevre90210 said:It's expensive, to really enjoy the graphics you need a HDTV, the games are expensive too.
and because most of them are people who don't play anything BUT halo and think that is all there is to gaming.hannahdonno said:Because it is far too expensive, huge and lumberous and why have one when you can settle for a cheaper, more versatile console?tokoolforranch said:So I own a PS3 and it seems like it is getting shunned by the world of gaming. Everywhere I go there is always a Microsoft fan boy telling me how much the PS3 sucks. Don't get me wrong, I've met some PS3 fan boys and the are not any better, but why is the PS3 the scum of the universe? Maybe it is just demographics, or maybe I just don't know enough people. AND, why the f-sauce didn't they release an expansion for Fallout 3 on the PS3??????? Not cool. >.<
XBOX 360 FTW.
True for both the PS3 and the 360. It's really why the both the PS3 and the 360 are getting their ass kicked by the Wii. Blu-ray isn't this huge innovation, it's just a disc with more space. That's really no more an innovation than thumbdrives getting bigger.Wargamer said:The 360 is just like it's flagship game series; hyped up, well presented, but brings nothing new to the table.
Uhhh...what? When was the last time you played Starcraft? An average match in that game takes 30-45 minutes. Within that timespan you've set up your base, expanded, researched everything and had fierce fights all over the map. The "twiddling your thumbs" phase only takes about the first minute or so till you have enough resources to start pumping out troops.Mazty said:Supreme Commander and SoaSE are faster than Starcraft, just the games take longer. In starcraft there is a lot of waiting around for nothing. I'm not saying every game has t be speed matches, but when you're sat doing bugger all, that's when something has gone wrong.
I know this is the first page and this thread has hit eight by the time I got here, but seriously.New Troll said:I still don't even understand the confusion people are having over the PS3. It has it's purpose. It's not suppose to be a hardcore gaming machine like the XBox 360. It's a multimedia console.
I also don't understand the complaints over price. Sure it's expensive, but it's cheaper than buying an XBox 360, a wireless adaptor, and a Bluray player seperately.
I think the biggest draw the PS3 has to a serious gamer is the fact it's a lot less likely to break down over the XBox 360. Other than that though, any serious gamer should probably own both if they're truly serious. Else they're just hypocrits. And you call yourself a gamer...
I didnt need to counter argur because i'm not trying to argue with you, fanboyWargamer said:Given what the PS3 can do, if the release dates were reversed we'd have "What the fuck is Microsoft doing re-releasing the original Xbox?" threads.Davey Woo said:I think if the PS3 came out first, people would be making "why does the 360 suck" threads instead.
As I've said, the only thing the 360 does is play games... and most of the 'big games' seem to be FPSs at that. The PS3 can play games to... but it also plays Blu-ray, allows you to surf the net, lets you store music and photos, lets you stream stuff to your PSP, can be set up to interact with your PC... in short, it behaves far more like a PC than a traditional console, and I think that's where consoles have to go.
The 360 is just like it's flagship game series; hyped up, well presented, but brings nothing new to the table.
Copy & Paste the "pot kettle black" comment.Goldbling said:I didnt need to counter argur because i'm not trying to argue with you, fanboy
Correction, a dogged determination to put down imbeciles who can't back their claims.you are sticking up for the PS3 pretty hard witch shows me the lack of confidince you have in the console you have selected.
Your whole "argument" has no content. That was my point. I provide evidence, you provide sheer idiocy. You need evidence to back your claims. You have yet to do so, because you have none.MGS4 and LBP sucked, I own ALL PS3 exclusives, stop selecting different parts of my "arguement" and read it as a whole.
Funny, the only time I lagged was when my wireless router was dying... not the PS3's fault.No people wouldent make "why does blah blah blah" threads because the only thing that matters is the games, and like I said why would i get a muli-platform (in this case lets use CoD for an example) game on a console that has laggy connections, I swear its like going to war exept everyone moves from where they are to 3 feet ahead of them.
360 120GB HDD = £100 or more.And the 360 stores music photos and video, not to mention hi-def streaming from netflix to your console. and while I will admit Microsoft cons you out of 100 bucks for a new HDD its well worth it in the end
It really doesn't help that your messages are half evidence, half idiocy themselves. Halo 3 might not be your cup of tea, it might not be the best shooter around, but calling it "the shittiest shooters around" (your words, not mine) means you really aren't any better than the imbeciles that you so like putting down.Wargamer said:Your whole "argument" has no content. That was my point. I provide evidence, you provide sheer idiocy.
I refuse to play Halo, it is possibly the most over-hyped game EVER.aprilmarie said:and because most of them are people who don't play anything BUT halo and think that is all there is to gaming.hannahdonno said:Because it is far too expensive, huge and lumberous and why have one when you can settle for a cheaper, more versatile console?tokoolforranch said:So I own a PS3 and it seems like it is getting shunned by the world of gaming. Everywhere I go there is always a Microsoft fan boy telling me how much the PS3 sucks. Don't get me wrong, I've met some PS3 fan boys and the are not any better, but why is the PS3 the scum of the universe? Maybe it is just demographics, or maybe I just don't know enough people. AND, why the f-sauce didn't they release an expansion for Fallout 3 on the PS3??????? Not cool. >.<
XBOX 360 FTW.
Some are just Microsoft fans and will swear by it no matter what.
Personally, I prefer PS3.
This man speaks truth. Listen to him. For he... ahh, who am I kidding this topic is just going to continue to up in flames. Everybody outside of video games seems to be against us and who can blame them when even internally we're against each other.miracleofsound said:People slagging eachother's consoles is hilariously pathetic.
We all like games, surely there's no need to be so ridiculously petty and start squabbling like a bunch of little girls fighting over who has the best barbie doll.
I got news for you: other gamers are not the enemy... save your flames for the ones who condemn your passtime and try to blame it for all of society's ills.
I have a 360 and a PS2 and they have both given me many happy hours.