hanselthecaretaker said:
I can understand that while it may not be everyone's cup of tea, when someone likens a Souls game to mere hack n slash with empty gameplay it suggests they haven't acquired a sufficient frame of reference. Elder Scrolls for instance would actually fit that description far more aptly, along with the massive world having much less to offer in the way of significant discoveries and structure. Dante's Inferno for one would make a more suitable bed fellow with Call of Duty in the above example, but even then it's a bit degrading to the former.
These are of course still matters of personal taste, but in this case they also carry years of deliberate critical weight from both sides of the industry.
Dude, I never said that Dark Souls and Call of Duty have the same quality of gameplay. All I said is that they're both games that fall under genres that I don't care for. That's all. Is Dark Souls miles better than Call of Duty? Hey, sure, if you insist. I don't care about either, so I don't really care how they rank against each other.
Like, this post comes off as if... if I had said "I don't like tea or coffee," and then you said "Okay but tea is great, don't lump it in with that gross coffee shit." That's great? You want me to admit tea's better than coffee? Sure, fine, whatever. Tea's better than coffee. But I would still rather have a coke, because it all tastes like shit to me.
So is Dark Souls better than Call of Duty? Sure, fine, whatever. But I'd still rather play Dishonored.