Yeah red(I'm sorry, but I had to say that) It would pretty much mess everything up in my opinion. What's the point in working if you don't get paid, who then will maintain services for basic human needs, power plants, sewer systems and the like. How many people do you know who would willinly give up their liv's to keep evryone else happy?TeeBs said:Thats probably the most extreme form of communism ive ever seen.
It wouldn't work thats why we don't do it, whats the point of working if you get nothing for it.
This.NeedAUserName said:Then about 1% of people would do stuff, and 99% of people would demand then 1% to do everything for them. Money is an incentive to work, its a reward system, you work and can have nice things, you don't work, you get minimal.
Yep, half the episodes of M*A*S*H exist because of this.tthor said:Have you ever played an RPG with delivery quests? some quests, such as the ones described in Epic Mickey or legend of zelda, go along the lines of:
'person A wants a ball, which person B has. but person B wants a apple, which person C has. But person C wants a toy, that person D has. But person D wants you to chop 20 pieces of wood before you get the toy.'
without currency, this would be what would happen often if you wanted a certain item or service. but with currency, you can skip delivering items to all the people, and just pay person B some money for his damn ball. That way you get the ball immediately, and then person B can pay person C for the apple, person C can pay person D for his toy, and person D can pay to hire someone to chop the wood.
...and many more. Take your pick.Pielikey said:Because people like to own stuff, that's why.