Dragon Age 2 wasn't bad, but it wasn't great either. It ranks low on my list of favourite Bioware games but it still ranks above Neverwinter Nights for me (I know, I'm weird, I didn't get on with Neverwinter Nights).
For me, the combat annoyed the hell out of me (why do people randomly jump in everytime!?), the GUI looked far too clean and devoid of any character, Anders went from an amazing and hilarious character in Awakening, to deadbeat, over serious Mage in the sequel, there was alot of de ja vous in each dungeon and the fact it was all in Kirkwall felt restrictive.
Still, Varrick was awesome, the plot was actually pretty good, the Qunari kicked ass and I loved the combat animations and the speed of it. Plus the skill tree made alot more sense and I loved the fact the story was being told by Varrick.
So, yeah, alot of glaring problems outshined the good points, that's why I think people raged at it. It was okay, but ultimately one of Bioware's more forgettable offerings.
Origins, however, was brilliant.
For me, the combat annoyed the hell out of me (why do people randomly jump in everytime!?), the GUI looked far too clean and devoid of any character, Anders went from an amazing and hilarious character in Awakening, to deadbeat, over serious Mage in the sequel, there was alot of de ja vous in each dungeon and the fact it was all in Kirkwall felt restrictive.
Still, Varrick was awesome, the plot was actually pretty good, the Qunari kicked ass and I loved the combat animations and the speed of it. Plus the skill tree made alot more sense and I loved the fact the story was being told by Varrick.
So, yeah, alot of glaring problems outshined the good points, that's why I think people raged at it. It was okay, but ultimately one of Bioware's more forgettable offerings.
Origins, however, was brilliant.