Why Heavy Rain is a good game and Final Fantasy 13 isn't - a compare (Mild spoilers)

Recommended Videos

megapenguinx

New member
Jan 8, 2009
3,865
0
0
D_987 said:
Yay, let's compare two games that have absolutely nothing to do with each other! And let's not even compare those two games properly, but simply state our thoughts on the matter, therefore creating a review on two games in which we don't properly review either one...
D is right,
this review isn't much of a review of basically anything.
All you are doing is spouting random nonsense about both games in an effort to be comical.
I give this review: 1 penguin out of 5.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,453
2,022
118
Country
USA
dathwampeer said:
Wait a final fantasy game was less than impressive?

HALT THE MOTHAFUKIN PRESSES EVERYONE! Front page news here.
Actually, yes, do so for at least 3 reasons:
1) Some of the series have been among the best games ever;
2) The money put into them, the hype, the production values, should add up to something;
3) The review are typically very positive.

So when you pick it up and it greatly disappoints, it is like finding out there's no Santa Claus.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,453
2,022
118
Country
USA
dathwampeer said:
Gorfias said:
dathwampeer said:
Wait a final fantasy game was less than impressive?

HALT THE MOTHAFUKIN PRESSES EVERYONE! Front page news here.
Actually, yes, do so for at least 3 reasons:
1) Some of the series have been among the best games ever;
2) The money put into them, the hype, the production values, should add up to something;
3) The review are typically very positive.

So when you pick it up and it greatly disappoints, it is like finding out there's no Santa Claus.
1) They haven't been good since FFVI
2) Yea, because high budget means quality product. See Micheal Bay.
3) Yet reviews for Metro 2033 were appauling, psychonauts is a relative unknown for most people and over 95% of my real life freinds have never even heard of portal. It's all publicity. Big franchises get big attention.
1) FF 10 ties Halo IMHO for game of gen 6. FF-X2, wins game most likely to make you blush with embarassment that you are playing it and FF 12: not the worst game of gen 6, but easily, far and away the most disappointing. I can't even think of a close 2nd. But, You skip over 6-10, thought of by most gamers as nothing less than amazing. A bold opinion.
2 and 3) I like Michael Bay just fine, but, James Cameron would not have achieved what he did without a big, record breaking budgets for T2, Titanic and Avatar. Money matters. That doesn't mean you can't make a buried treasure like My Big Fat Greek Wedding without a lot of money. But you need it if your going to make these spectaculars.
 

Flamezdudes

New member
Aug 27, 2009
3,696
0
0
dathwampeer said:
Gorfias said:
dathwampeer said:
Wait a final fantasy game was less than impressive?

HALT THE MOTHAFUKIN PRESSES EVERYONE! Front page news here.
Actually, yes, do so for at least 3 reasons:
1) Some of the series have been among the best games ever;
2) The money put into them, the hype, the production values, should add up to something;
3) The review are typically very positive.

So when you pick it up and it greatly disappoints, it is like finding out there's no Santa Claus.
1) They haven't been good since FFVI
2) Yea, because high budget means quality product. See Micheal Bay.
3) Yet reviews for Metro 2033 were appauling, psychonauts is a relative unknown for most people and over 95% of my real life freinds have never even heard of portal. It's all publicity. Big franchises get big attention.
WOW, WOW, WOW. How in hell can you say that? Most of the best Final Fantasies are VI onwards.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,453
2,022
118
Country
USA
dathwampeer said:
1 I have disliked every FF since VI. Turn table based games hold no interest for me any more because better games have been made.

2 Bay's a hack. I can't think of 1 decent movie he's ever made. At-least Cameron made Aliens and The Terminator.

3 Never watched MBFGW and I doubt I ever will.

4 A big budget does not mean a great product.
1) What are your favorite RPGS, Western or Japanese, that have come out since then?
2) Yes he is, but he's a glorious, over the top hack. I love "The Rock", even if the best scene in it is a plot hole. He really knows how to put some fun crap up on the screen. There are great directors like Altman who wouldn't know what to do with a giant budget if you gave them one.
3) Fun movie. I just watched on my 360 streamed from Netflix, "The Truth About Average Guys" which cost $5K to make. You can see that it is very, very low budget, but it is funnier than many big budget movies, so, of course, money doesn't equal quality.
4) Correct: but it does create expectations. In FF13's case, you can see that money on the screen. It is gorgeous, and to me, that adds to the overall experience. Great graphics are why I spent $150 alone on a video card for my PC. (The same shop had one for $600... these things matter to people). When quality people with big budgets produce something that is ultimately a let down, it hurts worse than when a hack with no budget screws up.
 

Skops

New member
Mar 9, 2010
820
0
0
dathwampeer said:
1) They haven't been good since FFVI
3) Yet reviews for Metro 2033 were appauling, psychonauts is a relative unknown for most people and over 95% of my real life freinds have never even heard of portal. It's all publicity. Big franchises get big attention.
1 - This is very true. Final Fantasy has also lacked a 'REAL' villain since VI as well. What's all this about Sephiroth? I don't get it, a sad momma's boy TRIES to destroy the world and ultimately fails because of a clone. 'TRIES' being the main point, Kefka didn't TRY, he fucking did it.

3 - Not to insult your friends, but if they haven't heard of Portal... They must live sheltered, internetless lives. Even my Parents know what Portal is and they've never seen or played it.
 

harnzolo

New member
May 24, 2009
21
0
0
I agree with the OP at least with the topic name. Of course, they can't be compared. They are of totally different genres!!
 

SL33TBL1ND

Elite Member
Nov 9, 2008
6,467
0
41
D_987 said:
Yay, let's compare two games that have absolutely nothing to do with each other! And let's not even compare those two games properly, but simply state our thoughts on the matter, therefore creating a review on two games in which we don't properly review either one...
He's comparing the fun value of the game, mostly. But yeah, him comparing the art style was kinda silly but the rest of it was him saying that he liked Heavy Rain more because of x, y and z. Nothing wrong with that.
 

Thick

New member
Feb 10, 2009
191
0
0
D_987 said:
Yay, let's compare two games that have absolutely nothing to do with each other! And let's not even compare those two games properly, but simply state our thoughts on the matter, therefore creating a review on two games in which we don't properly review either one...
Without disagreeing, and wishing no offense, I am very curious how a proper comparison would work. No seriously, no sarcasm or ill intent, just want to know.

OT: Haven't played Heavy Rain, so it's impossible for me to compare. I'll also not defend FF against valid complaints. The one thing I will say is that there was something about Lightning (FF Heroine), the ways she was characterized, that I found really appealing. Not only was there the usual, admittedly stereotypical angst v heart of gold thing, but there were lots of moments of identity crisis (not literal, amnesiac sort of identity crisis but the self-doubt v. self-discovery sort) and plot important internal-emotional conflicts and shifts.

Oh, and using different names for the FF characters didn't help you at all, considering you obviously did remember the names and it took me a while to figure out who you were talking about with Kurt Kobain because, silly me, I was thinking more of character traits than looks. Apparently I'm a rhetahd.
 

Harlemura

Ace Defective
May 1, 2009
3,327
0
0
I know it's opinions and all that, but a few of the things that you said about Final Fantasy, I actually liked.
The crystarium and linear gameplay were simple. No crazy, confusing junctioning, and no running around getting lost and having to do yet another fight every 3 steps when you make a wrong turn every 4.
And, excuse my fanboyism, but I liked the characters. There's the whole developing thing going on with Hope, Vanille's "dark secrets" thing and Lightning eventually showing she does have more emotions than a fairly aggressive plank of wood all struck a chord with me.

As for Heavy Rain, I've never played it. From what I've heard, it sounds just like a movie that you have to interact with.
I'd rather just watch a movie.

On a side note...
GamesGibbon said:
The mass chocobo slaughter was the point at which I refused to play the game anymore.
Whoa, am I missing something here?
Because I certainly don't remember that part of the game.
Unless you're being metaphorical, in which case... actually, I still wouldn't know what you're on about.
 

GamesGibbon

New member
Jul 12, 2010
23
0
0
FreelanceButler said:
I know it's opinions and all that, but a few of the things that you said about Final Fantasy, I actually liked.
The crystarium and linear gameplay were simple. No crazy, confusing junctioning, and no running around getting lost and having to do yet another fight every 3 steps when you make a wrong turn every 4.
And, excuse my fanboyism, but I liked the characters. There's the whole developing thing going on with Hope, Vanille's "dark secrets" thing and Lightning eventually showing she does have more emotions than a fairly aggressive plank of wood all struck a chord with me.

As for Heavy Rain, I've never played it. From what I've heard, it sounds just like a movie that you have to interact with.
I'd rather just watch a movie.

On a side note...
GamesGibbon said:
The mass chocobo slaughter was the point at which I refused to play the game anymore.
Whoa, am I missing something here?
Because I certainly don't remember that part of the game.
Unless you're being metaphorical, in which case... actually, I still wouldn't know what you're on about.
Heavy Rain is less of a 'playable movie' than Final Fantasy or Metal Gear Solid have ever been. All games are basically interactive movies to a point anyway.

And when you go to the planet with the Chocobo farm - You get ambushed by ba guys and all the chocobos get killed.
 

Take5

New member
Jul 15, 2010
3
0
0
Right on the money, it's all true heavy rain has a lot of crappy moments but ff fourthousand is choc full of exetremely horrible moments .. infact the whole game from start to finish is a horrible moment.
LOL lionel ritchie haha
 

Diligent

New member
Dec 20, 2009
749
0
0
The comparisons made me laugh at points, but I can shorten the whole thing:
Final Fantasy XIII has Vanille in it, arguably the most annoying character ever created.
I was sitting there rooting for her death or maiming in cutscenes, and if thats how you're looking at the characters your supposed to care about, they did something horribly wrong.

Haven't played Heavy Rain, but I'm sure it has nothing that bad.