Well... you did say "I don't know what that is."...Abandon4093 said:I know it's hypocrisy. I was trying to give the point more of an impact. You probably see the word hypocrite thrown around atleast once an internet argument. It's kinda lost it's meaning.
And do you think that if I said that I was going to adopt a persona of a complete dickhole and then go around insulting everybody that I quoted. Would that be alright because I said I adopted a persona?
Somehow I severely doubt I'd get away with it. Especially considering the only times I've ever insulted anyone it's been pretty justifiable and it's never been harsh. Yet I've still been moderated for it.
I just think the Escapist are taking the piss when they actively pay someone to say more provocative things than I've ever said, whilst still telling me I can't have an argument properly because I might hurt somebodies feelings.
Anyway, I personally would be OK with you adopting a persona of a complete dickhole, so long as it was for entertainment, or comedy, or any point at all other than actually being a complete dickhole. I don't know how OK the mods would be with it though (I'm guessing they wouldn't be all that happy...).
I guess the difference is that I don't find Jim to be offensive at all. None of his insults are ever personal, or actually relevant or important. He's the online video-making equivalent of a teenager who calls everyone gay... sure he is technically insulting people, but no-one really cares, least of all the people or things being called "gay". It doesn't really mean anything.
I do take your point on the hypocrisy, but I like The Escapist and want it to keep running, so I'm OK with them showing whatever videos they like as long as I'm never forced to watch them. I also like The Escapist being one of the few well-moderated forums on the net, so I'm OK with them moderating against insults and offensive behaviour. It may be hypocritical to act like this, but it's also the most beneficial to both the forum and the site, so who cares?