UmJammerSully said:
Yep, pretty much my exact view, maybe minus the "animals are dicks" part lol.
I'm genuinely interested to hear an argument against this though, as I have yet to hear a good one.
Predators in the wild have no alternative, they starve if they don't kill animals. We actually have perfect alternatives, it's possible to replace all essential nutrients in meat without eating meat. There is absolutely no need for us to slaughter animals.
Anyway, if you can't be bothered with the animals, there's still the argument that it's bad for humanity to consume meat on the scale we do. Producing meat is extremely energy-inefficient, the energy input is roughly ten times as high as the energy output. What this means is that the planet could easily produce enough food for the entire human population if we would at least limit our meat consumption. Not to mention the various environmental problems that it causes.
I'm not a vegetarian at the moment, but I'm thinking about becoming one. I like meat a lot though, so it'll be tough. Perhaps I'll start by limiting my meat consumption.