Why is Fox News attacks games a headline article, but the violent game against them not?

[mikeysnakes]

Just kidding, I'm Australian and our political system is kinda weird. Our Liberal Party is actually right wing, and out "left" wing party is called the Labour Party, who at the moment are acting very right wing as well. So, we have a choice between Conservative and slightly more conservative at the moment.

Honestly, it's kind of the same deal in America for the past few decades too, this is why things like Net Neutrality were never passed, Tax cuts for the rich were extended and shitty companies like Chevy were bailed out so they can send all their factories to Mexico, even under a supposedly offensively liberal president. ^_^

Well, that stayed on topic... Umm... Fox news sucks! It's not so much about their political agenda more then the fact that they don't fact check anything they say, and just go for the biggest impact when reporting. So, they kinda have a target on their backs.

Definitely hit it with that one, the worst part is that they can also drum up support whenever people call it on them that they didn't check their facts.

 

[DexterNorgam]

edit: Oops.

 

[Archtype]

because one is lies and fear mongering, and the other is slightly tasteless satire?

Your opinion, and thats fine. I disagree. True, Fox News' stance on video games have riled me up as well, but I disagree about the lies and fear mongering. They are against liberals, against Obama destroying this country, and against big government. If that truly is there stance, then I agree with them.

Besides, I do notice the tremendous amount of Fox News bashing around here, but I really dont see any bashing of MSNBC. They, in my opinion, are far worse.

Either way, to me its just another example of how the left likes to put their spin on things. If this had been a game with MSNBC staff members, or Chris Matthews and such, I can promise you it would have been headlines here, as well as EVERYWHERE else.

Lol yeah this site is definitely full of libbies. No doubt. It is kinda painful sometimes considering that their "open-minded-ness" (lol) is REALLY hard to see... but I just tune it out. Because their non-political stuff (eg: game opinions) are sometimes pretty intuitive.

The reason the word "liberal" is not really looked on with much favor these days is that the modern lib leaders are trying to change the wrong stuff. They have poisoned a normally good thing.

Ah yes, and I still can't understand why conservatives are considered the pansies here. Wouldn't that fall under our esteemed President's jurisdiction? I mean, after all... he is the idiot going around and bowing to every enemy we have and trying to make us all appear as pathetic and helpless as possible. I miss people like Teddy Roosevelt (DEMOCRAT!!), Reagan, and many others who were not afraid to cause a bit of a stir when need be.

I'm still waiting for the expansion pack that includes me being able to n00b the hundreds of lib personalities. Thatd be sweet.