Not like the game was BAD, but it seems that when I see a Halo discussion, I always find someone who says the series was best at 2.
Imho, I didn't enjoy 2 at all. The game had some interesting parts and was definitely neat, but I just couldn't get over the number of times you got sent to Doom-esque corridors (the same corridors that the first game was famous for not having) to fight off endless Flood. The Flood-centered levels really represent to me what FPSs are at their lowest: mindlessly gunning down identical enemies in a dark, confusing, corridor.
The only way I could see it being as revered as it is is because of the multiplayer (which I'm too young to have played at its glory days), but the other games were pretty solid on both sp and mp.
So, why is it considered by some to be the best.
EDIT: Yes, you have the right to your opinion, I'm just curious of why. I hope this doesn't sound like one of those "WHY DO PEOPLE LIEK COD HUR DUR" threads.
Imho, I didn't enjoy 2 at all. The game had some interesting parts and was definitely neat, but I just couldn't get over the number of times you got sent to Doom-esque corridors (the same corridors that the first game was famous for not having) to fight off endless Flood. The Flood-centered levels really represent to me what FPSs are at their lowest: mindlessly gunning down identical enemies in a dark, confusing, corridor.
The only way I could see it being as revered as it is is because of the multiplayer (which I'm too young to have played at its glory days), but the other games were pretty solid on both sp and mp.
So, why is it considered by some to be the best.
EDIT: Yes, you have the right to your opinion, I'm just curious of why. I hope this doesn't sound like one of those "WHY DO PEOPLE LIEK COD HUR DUR" threads.