Oh, of course just not wanting to see gay sex isn't homophobic. I don't want to see two guys at it. I think you really have to see that thread to see what I'm talking about, and I've forgotten where it is :/Helmholtz Watson said:Now I haven't seen the comments you were referring to so I could be wrong, but disliking guys kissing each other isn't homophobic. You don't have to be afraid or angry at gay people to find such scenes unappealing. It's a bit of a leap to brand them as homophobic. At best they are hypocritical for condemning one scene while saying nothing about another.GeneralTwinkle said:It's not to me either, but it's the fact that they were complaining about it not sticking to the book as a shield for homophobia. If they really believed that, they would have been complaining about all the other added sex scenes and deviations from the book.
Unless they are artists, or it is something awesome like planes. If it is just something kinda interesting that some to people totally dig IT MUST END!Risingblade said:It's different from the norm, people don't like things that are different it's basic human nature.
Also I see this is being strangled out by our generation, even the faithful are coming alongVladG said:One word: Religion. Mostly Christianity.
We're a morally backwards country. Glad to see that the rest of the West sees us like that, because you can't believe how annoying it is for those of us in the US who aren't backwards.sanquin said:This topic might be better suited for the politics/religion forum. But anyway:
I would like to point out that of the western countries I know, it's mostly America that's so incredibly prude and homophobic. Here in the Netherlands at least we're pretty open about sex, and homosexuality is mostly accepted. (You always have bigots in every society) I personally wouldn't know why America turned into such a prude and homophobic country, I would like to know too.