Why is Misanthropy ok but racism taboo?

Recommended Videos

somonels

New member
Oct 12, 2010
1,209
0
0
Chefodeath said:
[HEADING=1]We all hate those ignorant, hate filled fucks.[/HEADING]
A vision you share with misanthropes everywhere. Easily adapted for a narrower group, like by race, sexual preference or diet, like you do.
 

Lyri

New member
Dec 8, 2008
2,660
0
0
Chefodeath said:
I think we can all agree that there are few attitudes as taboo in the modern age as racism. Nothing will lead quicker to total social ostricization than to let loose a few racist comments and slurs. We all hate those ignorant, hate filled fucks. My question is why doesn't this attitude carry over to misanthropes, those folks who hate all of humanity instead of just some particular segment? Misanthropes enjoy a much warmer cultural reception. He can be seen as charming and sympathetic, someone fed up with the bullshit of his species. Even at his worst, the general misanthrope is received better than a racist.

Why is this? Shouldn't it logically follow that misanthropes are worse people than racists if they do the racist's job and then some?
As far as I'm aware, Misanthropes have never done anything significant throughout history to be worth hating.
If there was some dictator to spring up who had misanthropic tendencies then sure, people whimsically throwing out lines of that nature would be looked at differently.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Chefodeath said:
I think we can all agree that there are few attitudes as taboo in the modern age as racism. Nothing will lead quicker to total social ostricization than to let loose a few racist comments and slurs. We all hate those ignorant, hate filled fucks. My question is why doesn't this attitude carry over to misanthropes, those folks who hate all of humanity instead of just some particular segment? Misanthropes enjoy a much warmer cultural reception. He can be seen as charming and sympathetic, someone fed up with the bullshit of his species. Even at his worst, the general misanthrope is received better than a racist.

Why is this? Shouldn't it logically follow that misanthropes are worse people than racists if they do the racist's job and then some?
No it shouldn't. because logically speaking, there is much more logical evidence to support misanthropism, than racism. Also, racism is inherently unjust, whereas misanthropy is not. Finally, us misanthropes are correct.
 

Eggbert

New member
Jun 9, 2010
161
0
0
Two reasons:
First, as already stated, they don't discriminate. It's just a general hatred. It's like a punch to the gut: if only one colour of people gets it, then you're pulling them out of the group. If everyone gets it, then it's fair.

Second, they're misanthropes. They avoid people, all the time. And they're generally good at it. So most people don't meet them, and are only exposed to media interpretations. Which are generally positive. And then that forms people's opinions. Bam.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
probably because people are socially conditioned to not like racism, but the media doesn't tell you how to feel about Misanthropy
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
summerof2010 said:
Because people are more concerned about equality than they are with... well most anything else, actually. At least that's the way it is in America.
na, we Americans just pretend that "we don't see color", I think America is probably just secretly racist now.
 

Jake0fTrades

New member
Jun 5, 2008
1,295
0
0
Because all of the angsty teens on the internet can sympathize with a misanthrope, but still feel good about themselves for hating racism.
 

yoshiru

New member
Mar 7, 2011
46
0
0
I see your racism, and I raise you "being against homosexuality". (I'm all in, btw.... as it were)
 

Arakasi

New member
Jun 14, 2011
1,252
0
0
Chefodeath said:
I think we can all agree that there are few attitudes as taboo in the modern age as racism. Nothing will lead quicker to total social ostricization than to let loose a few racist comments and slurs. We all hate those ignorant, hate filled fucks. My question is why doesn't this attitude carry over to misanthropes, those folks who hate all of humanity instead of just some particular segment? Misanthropes enjoy a much warmer cultural reception. He can be seen as charming and sympathetic, someone fed up with the bullshit of his species. Even at his worst, the general misanthrope is received better than a racist.

Why is this? Shouldn't it logically follow that misanthropes are worse people than racists if they do the racist's job and then some?
Hatred of a minority does not come under equality.
Misanthropy is equal for all.
 

Unesh52

New member
May 27, 2010
1,375
0
0
Volf99 said:
summerof2010 said:
Because people are more concerned about equality than they are with... well most anything else, actually. At least that's the way it is in America.
na, we Americans just pretend that "we don't see color", I think America is probably just secretly racist now.
It's not really that secret, it's just that everyone's distracted by the rampant islamophobia and heterosexism.
 

notebook_holder

New member
Apr 16, 2009
24
0
0
Just a random quote from a poet about misanthropes :"Real misanthropes are not found in solitude, but in the world; since it is experience of life, and not philosophy, which produces real hatred of mankind." -Leopardi Now this poet isn't a misanthrope he is an extremely pessimistic person.

What most people are saying is true, their hate is general they see all kinds of people as dirt or parasites. In most cases people stay away from them or try to better themselves from them or they don't want to be belittled by them.

Schopenhauer is one of the most notable misanthropes and his works are excellent most notably "The world as will and representation". Though he was also a misogynist and it shows in his writings. It was mentioned somewhere that he once pushed an old woman down the stairs fairly funny.

"Politeness is to human nature what warmth is to wax." Schopenhauer.

Misanthropes have a philosophy and the world for his hatred. A racist is a bigot thinking some other race is inferior
 

bloodrayne626

New member
May 15, 2008
57
0
0
Volf99 said:
AD-Stu said:
It's because misanthropy isn't discriminatory - if you hate everyone then nobody gets left out. Plus the average misanthrope's justification for his/her position is typically a lot more logical than the average racist's.
so by that logic, if a person was racist (or hateful to a particular ethnic group) because of a logic reason, it would be ok? How about old Chinese people who lived in Nanjing their whole life and had the Rape of Nanjing inflicted upon that persons sister, mother and grandmother? Would it be ok for them to hate Japanese people because of the traumatic experience that happened?
I don't think you quite get the point of the argument.
A person who discriminates towards a particular race - whether for logical or illogical reasons - is still a racist, and therefore frowned upon. Your example, while specific, still puts racists in a bad light because the old Chinese people are discriminating against the entire Japanese populace, the majority of whom had nothing to do with the Nanjing incident.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
summerof2010 said:
Volf99 said:
summerof2010 said:
Because people are more concerned about equality than they are with... well most anything else, actually. At least that's the way it is in America.
na, we Americans just pretend that "we don't see color", I think America is probably just secretly racist now.
It's not really that secret, it's just that everyone's distracted by the rampant islamophobia and heterosexism.
Well the Islam reaction comes with war, just like anti-German/Japanese feelings back in the 1940's. Heterosexism? wtf? Last I checked, most people tell me I'm not supposed to say, "that's so gay".
 

Some_weirdGuy

New member
Nov 25, 2010
611
0
0
No one cares about them for the same reason no one really seems to care if someone was being racist about their own race.
 

Unesh52

New member
May 27, 2010
1,375
0
0
Volf99 said:
Well the Islam reaction comes with war, just like anti-German/Japanese feelings back in the 1940's. Heterosexism? wtf? Last I checked, most people tell me I'm not supposed to say, "that's so gay".
Understanding why it did in fact happen doesn't exactly justify it. And heterosexism is a prejudice against homosexuality.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
bloodrayne626 said:
Volf99 said:
AD-Stu said:
It's because misanthropy isn't discriminatory - if you hate everyone then nobody gets left out. Plus the average misanthrope's justification for his/her position is typically a lot more logical than the average racist's.
so by that logic, if a person was racist (or hateful to a particular ethnic group) because of a logic reason, it would be ok? How about old Chinese people who lived in Nanjing their whole life and had the Rape of Nanjing inflicted upon that persons sister, mother and grandmother? Would it be ok for them to hate Japanese people because of the traumatic experience that happened?
I don't think you quite get the point of the argument.
A person who discriminates towards a particular race - whether for logical or illogical reasons - is still a racist, and therefore frowned upon. Your example, while specific, still puts racists in a bad light because the old Chinese people are discriminating against the entire Japanese populace, the majority of whom had nothing to do with the Nanjing incident.
AD-Stu made it sound like all the racist need was some legitimate reason to be racist for it to be ok. As for your explanation, I'm sorry I can't help but laugh at the idea that hating an entire race of people for the action of a few is bad, but somehow hating SEVEN BILLION people for the actions of a few is ok. That just doesn't add up. As far as I'm concerned, either both are ok, or neither of them are.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
summerof2010 said:
Volf99 said:
Well the Islam reaction comes with war, just like anti-German/Japanese feelings back in the 1940's. Heterosexism? wtf? Last I checked, most people tell me I'm not supposed to say, "that's so gay".
Understanding why it did in fact happen doesn't exactly justify it. And heterosexism is a prejudice against homosexuality.
true,but it helps to understand why people feel that way. lol heterosexism, what a stupid term.
 

Krois

New member
Jun 2, 2011
47
0
0
I wonder if the logic demands here is if racism grants +5 Hate and misanthropy is a hate of all existing human races thus the entire species. So.. (+5Hate*n=Misanthrope+hate deserved) where "n" is the amount of imaginable race in this world.

Point missed here is by the time someone or at least me turned into a misanthrope, we will also undoubtedly realize it is futile to fight against or force the entire species to turn into someone we like or agrees with. Thus we are mostly secret haters of this species (yes, hating ourselves being among this species too, shameful really) and generally view as having perma-bad day with everyone.

What we don't and can't do is sack employees for being human, but a racist can fire people for being black and a sexist can drop people for being homo.

Sorry if my post seems aggressive but being a misanthrope myself, reading the opening post is more of less the same as someone posting a discussion that dog-hater cat-lover should deserve the same hate as racism. If you're going to say dogs and cats are animals thus viewed different, then you're more bias than what you think of us to be.