Why is Star Wars: Episode I Looked Upon With Despise?

Recommended Videos

Caligulove

New member
Sep 25, 2008
3,029
0
0
Theres no direction to the plot. Hell, there isn't even a main character! Theres too much going on and too much emphasis to apparently just shove as much in there as possible. This is a problem that all of the prequels have. Arguably, the only movie that almost diverts from this is Episode III, but even then its still kind of a mess.

I still LIKE them, they're fun to watch and fun to riff on with mates when drinking or just having a good time. But when you compare them to the original series, or really any other film with an understandable plot, characters and direction- they fall short
 

Unborn023

New member
Aug 17, 2009
160
0
0
They tried a bit to hard to make it kid friendly at some point with the addition of characters that do nothing but annoy (Jar Jar Binks,well..... pretty much every alien)
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,404
0
0
Midiclorians. That was bad.

Jar Jar Fucking Binks was awful.

But for me the biggest deal breaker was shoe-horning in C3P0 and R2D2. Seriously, Darth Vader built C3P0? This isn't just the most enormously contrived bullshit plot "WTF" moment in sci-fi history?
 

CrazyGirl17

I am a banana!
Sep 11, 2009
5,141
0
0
Eh, I was okay with it personally, and Jar Jar didn't bug me all that much. I didn't care much for "Attack of the Clones", but I thought "Revenge of the Sith" was pretty good. And being a fan of the "Darths and Droids" webcomic kinda helps.
 

evilartist

New member
Nov 9, 2009
471
0
0
Yelchor said:
I can understand the negative views on Episode II and III, but Episode I put itself on the same level as the original movies for me.
There isn't really much else I can rant about Episode I that already hasn't been mentioned by the other posters. However, based on your statement that I quoted, I have to ask: did you even watch the original trilogy before watching the prequels? I've got to say, I couldn't disagree more that Ep 1 is up to the same level of quality as Ep 4-6, but I'm curious to know what order you watched them in.
 

That's Funny

New member
Jul 20, 2009
805
0
0
It's definately not the worst Star wars out there, but it is still quite bad, as Red letter media points out in his Episode 2 review, the prequels were only there to cash in on the franchise and create a new line of toys and video games in the process, that's why characters like Obi-Wan and Anakin are underdeveloped and the reason why Jar-Jar exists, heck Lucas has done it before by creating the Ewoks in Return of the Jedi, just to make him more money by creating toys which foolish children will beg their parents to buy.

Although many despise Episode 1 for this, they did not expect the abominations that 2 & 3 were, and how they left huge stain on the franchise.
 

randomrob

New member
Aug 5, 2009
592
0
0
i really like episode 1. I don't get why people rag on it so much, or on midichlorians either. I think it's a fair explanation and makes the force seem less like a deity. I hated episode 2 but i thought 3 was fair apart from natalie portman and whatshis face who plays Anakin.
 

ultimateownage

This name was cool in 2008.
Feb 11, 2009
5,346
0
41
To quote yahtzee "Fans are annoying complaining dip shits who won't be great full for anything you give them." It's similar to the new Indiana Jones movie, it isn't like the originals, therefore it is shit.
 

Kagim

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,200
0
0
Caurus said:
Kagim said:
...

Most annoyingly is how they tried to make the first three movies somehow connect to the new three.

...

The WHOLE POINT of making those films was to give us Vader's history pre crazy-attack on his moral compass and connect/explain it all and make them all into a saga...which is original and awesome.
Not everything has to be connected by some past event. Not everything has to be explained by the actions of the same characters only in the past, not everything has to be a direct result from Character B when he was a young character B.

I don't like when the whole point of something like this is to explain something else. I didn't want to watch a movie explaining what my imagination already wrote for me. I wanted a movie about events i didn't know about. As said as well i dislike Vadar's back story. The only connection they honestly needed was Vadar was Lukes and Laias father and that they were somehow royalty. Nothing else.

Why did C3P0 have to be built by Vadar, there was no reason for it other then to shoe horn him in there.
Why did R2D2 have to be there at all. He was just a shoe horn.

The lack of ANY details given to Jango and Bobba pretty much means that one of my favorite characters was fan service. Which irritates me. He appeared to explain the clones, ran away, then promptly died. They could have used anything else, including the original clones just being a very powerful soldier. They went with Jango Fett to explain Bobba fett so they could shoe horn both characters into it and make Bobba Fett's existence entirely because of the clone wars. This feel entirely unnecessary and shoe horned just for fan service. Fan service that ultimately irritates me because THEY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING BUT TALK AND DIE!

But most importantly my original point was how they changed the original three movies to connect with the new three. Adding stupid new scenes, changing lines and implanting Anakins force ghost at the burial scene.
Raithnor said:
That's why I hated the stories about "Baby-stealing Jedis" and how they were effectively "dead" to their families. If force ability was a matter of bloodline, why not just take genetic material from power jedis and either create test-tube babies or clones. If the Jedi found that an abhorrent practice why didn't the Sith decide to do something similar. Even with Darth Bane's "Rule of Two" a Sith Master could essentially have created their own apprentice and raised him/her according to the warped Sith philosophy.
That's actually, kinda, explained in the MMO Star Wars Galaxies. Midochlorians can't survive the cloning process so well. Each clone is significantly weaker and the new jedi will have a significantly harder time channeling the force.

At least that's how it was before they turned the game into WoW in Space.
 

Fox242

El Zorro Cauto
Nov 9, 2009
868
0
0
The vast majority of the hatred has to do with this guy:


Episode I just plain sucked. Not even Liam Neeson could save it, and he's a damn fine actor with some brilliant work. Even though he did quite well as Qui-Gon Jin (in my opinon) all the other actors around him just plain sucked. There also wasn't enough action. There was too much deabte in the Senate and too much bullshit red tape. The pod racing was actually quite entertaining though. There was no charm to the whole thing. There was too much CGI and not enough charm like the original ones had. Episode I was just plain crap. That's why people hate it.
 

ultimateownage

This name was cool in 2008.
Feb 11, 2009
5,346
0
41
Pink_Pirate said:
uhm... your joking right? this is a late april's fool prank...right? RIGHT?!?
because you just outlined everything that wrong with the movie in the opening statement... so your beign sarcastic right?
well you left out midichlorans. The child actors were crap. The script was crap. JarJar was annoyingly not funny to anyone above the age of 10... i could go on... but i wont...
Actually, I was less than 10 and I didn't find it funny, so you would have to be too young to comprehend humour.
 

ma55ter_fett

New member
Oct 6, 2009
2,078
0
0
I liked it the best of the "new" star wars films. They still had a puppet like yoda which I quite liked. As for jar jar binks, I don't have any feelings one way or the other with him.

I liked it.
 

Pearwood

New member
Mar 24, 2010
1,929
0
0
I kept the same look of contempt on my face every time Jarjar appeared on screen. Other than that it was a decent movie, not great but not terrible.
 

Raithnor

New member
Jul 26, 2009
224
0
0
Kagim said:
Raithnor said:
That's why I hated the stories about "Baby-stealing Jedis" and how they were effectively "dead" to their families. If force ability was a matter of bloodline, why not just take genetic material from power jedis and either create test-tube babies or clones. If the Jedi found that an abhorrent practice why didn't the Sith decide to do something similar. Even with Darth Bane's "Rule of Two" a Sith Master could essentially have created their own apprentice and raised him/her according to the warped Sith philosophy.
That's actually, kinda, explained in the MMO Star Wars Galaxies. Midochlorians can't survive the cloning process so well. Each clone is significantly weaker and the new jedi will have a significantly harder time channeling the force.

At least that's how it was before they turned the game into WoW in Space.
Okay, I can buy the cloning reasoning mostly due to the whole "Copy of a copy" problem. That still doesn't explain why breeding Jedi bloodlines wouldn't work. There's a really obscure part of the EU that says that doesn't work either, but it's so out there than I don't really remember where it's from.

Again there's the inconsistances of "Children of Destiny" vs. "Legacy of the Force". The first is "A person has the force because the living force willed it so." and the second is "I am a Jedi, like my father before me."

The only clear answer seems to be: "Whatever works for the story they're trying to tell."

I was looking forward to the Plaguis/Sidious novel because from what was rumored Anakin's conception was rumored to be a Sith experiment by Plaguis. Which would have been nice because the "Immaculate Conception"-backstory comes with too much baggage being the cornerstone of modern Christianity.
 

Caurus

New member
Mar 24, 2010
145
0
0
Kagim said:
Caurus said:
Kagim said:
...

Most annoyingly is how they tried to make the first three movies somehow connect to the new three.

...

The WHOLE POINT of making those films was to give us Vader's history pre crazy-attack on his moral compass and connect/explain it all and make them all into a saga...which is original and awesome.
Not everything has to be connected by some past event. Not everything has to be explained by the actions of the same characters only in the past, not everything has to be a direct result from Character B when he was a young character B.

I don't like when the whole point of something like this is to explain something else. I didn't want to watch a movie explaining what my imagination already wrote for me. I wanted a movie about events i didn't know about. As said as well i dislike Vadar's back story. The only connection they honestly needed was Vadar was Lukes and Laias father and that they were somehow royalty. Nothing else.

Why did C3P0 have to be built by Vadar, there was no reason for it other then to shoe horn him in there.
Why did R2D2 have to be there at all. He was just a shoe horn.

The lack of ANY details given to Jango and Bobba pretty much means that one of my favorite characters was fan service. Which irritates me. He appeared to explain the clones, ran away, then promptly died. They could have used anything else, including the original clones just being a very powerful soldier. They went with Jango Fett to explain Bobba fett so they could shoe horn both characters into it and make Bobba Fett's existence entirely because of the clone wars. This feel entirely unnecessary and shoe horned just for fan service. Fan service that ultimately irritates me because THEY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING BUT TALK AND DIE!

But most importantly my original point was how they changed the original three movies to connect with the new three. Adding stupid new scenes, changing lines and implanting Anakins force ghost at the burial scene.
[

The short answer to this is YES everything does have to be connected else it wouldn't be a saga or a prequel!!!!

The world would be better off if they had never been made because they were cheesy/just rubbish (short answer again) not because they were prequels. It could have been done well but it wasn't.

Putting my arrogance aside for a moment...I AGREE that they were being a bit jammy about the whole thing...but I don't have an issue with the plot. I liked enough of it and

I LIKE SAGAS!

as a concept anyways...if you couldn't tell already
 

TimeLord

For the Emperor!
Legacy
Aug 15, 2008
7,508
3
43
reg42 said:
I actually like the 1st episode. Maybe it's just the kid in me talking (I haven't seen it in years), but I liked it. I did not like the 2nd and 3rd ones however, they were horrible (especially the 3rd one *shudder*)
I prefer the 3rd one to the 2nd, mainly cause in the 3rd Obi-Wan doesn't have a mullet!