It's rare enough that [i/]one[/i] intelligent species would develop in a hundred [i/]solar systems[/i].
Let alone multiple on a single planet.
Let alone multiple on a single planet.
The Drell are not native there, however.Niska said:The Hanar planet in Mass Effect 2 had both the Hanar and the Drell living on it.
Wrong on the first count right on the second.Tarkand said:Star Wars is really closer to fantasy in space than it is Sci-Fi tho.
The condition for intelligent life to appear in the first place on a given planet are pretty low to begin with, so having 2 of them on the same planet... and not have them destroy each other before they get out of the bronze age is extremely unlikely...
The fact is that hundreds of compounds dissolve in water, which is why it is necessary for life. Every single chemical reaction in our bodies uses water as a medium.BlindMessiah94 said:Most writers are lazy. It's far easier to create one race than thousands like we have on earth.
Also on a side note why do scientists assume all life needs water and oxygen? Just because we do here on earth doesn't mean there isn't some being out in the universe that breathes in sulfur and breathes out rainbows and dies at the mere mention of water.
Right?
We're the only species that will kill its own kind for no particular reason. And then we also kill for abstract concepts such as "God" and "freedom".Khitten said:Because the more intelligent a species gets the stupider they become. Look at humans for example. We will happily slaughter our own kind for even the slightest difference, even just being born on the wrong side of some imaginary line. Not to mention we then break it down further into cities, families and even just ourselves. In the end people are happy to hurt others and even the planet itself just to gain some quick temporary gain.
Well, we kinda had that on Earth long ago (Neanderthals), didn't really work out (for them, that is).recharge330 said:By that I mean native to that planet. I just realized I never hear about multiple intelligent species developing on a single planet in any Scifi universe.
The same reason there is only one human race, not humans and the other near human races that were around at the same time as us at one stage, we killed the bastards off. Unless the divide takes place after language and society is invented by the race, chances are one race will have murdered the crap out of the other race.recharge330 said:By that I mean native to that planet. I just realized I never hear about multiple intelligent species developing on a single planet in any Scifi universe.
Unless they evolve their society and technology at roughly the same pace (highly unlikely, tech leaps happen by chance and need) one race will simply dominate the "primitives" look at what happened on Earth.philosophicalbastard said:Have you considered the two species being separated by the geography of the planet, like two continents on either side of the world seperated by water? Because, unless a large amount of either species travels to the other continent they should be able to develop in peace.Tarkand said:Star Wars is really closer to fantasy in space than it is Sci-Fi tho.
The condition for intelligent life to appear in the first place on a given planet are pretty low to begin with, so having 2 of them on the same planet... and not have them destroy each other before they get out of the bronze age is extremely unlikely.
Both species would compete for the same ressource. It's from my understanding that Homo Sapion (us) and Cro-Magnon (Cave Man) existed during the same time period, but the Sapien basically wiped them out (direct conflict or simply ressource denial)... and those are both 'man'...
So in short, it doesn't happen because science doesn't support it... Sci-Fi tries to stick to scientific explanation (loosely).
We have to write off what we know, we've never met another alien race, all we've got to go on is some loose guesses, sure there might be Aliens out there shaped like squids that eat rocks and shit flowers, and given the size of the universe there probably is, was, or will be at some point, but the second part of Sci-Fi is Fiction, and fiction works best when you write what you know and can relate too.BlindMessiah94 said:Most writers are lazy. It's far easier to create one race than thousands like we have on earth.
Also on a side note why do scientists assume all life needs water and oxygen? Just because we do here on earth doesn't mean there isn't some being out in the universe that breathes in sulfur and breathes out rainbows and dies at the mere mention of water.
Right?
Yes but if you read what I wrote the point I'm getting at is that just because that's what it takes for life here on Earth to happen, that doesn't mean some other planet without water couldn't have life - it just might abide by different rules than life here.Uberjoe19 said:The fact is that hundreds of compounds dissolve in water, which is why it is necessary for life. Every single chemical reaction in our bodies uses water as a medium.BlindMessiah94 said:Most writers are lazy. It's far easier to create one race than thousands like we have on earth.
Also on a side note why do scientists assume all life needs water and oxygen? Just because we do here on earth doesn't mean there isn't some being out in the universe that breathes in sulfur and breathes out rainbows and dies at the mere mention of water.
Right?
I took that away from Xmen 2 as well XDTarkand said:Star Wars is really closer to fantasy in space than it is Sci-Fi tho.
The condition for intelligent life to appear in the first place on a given planet are pretty low to begin with, so having 2 of them on the same planet... and not have them destroy each other before they get out of the bronze age is extremely unlikely.
Both species would compete for the same ressource. It's from my understanding that Homo Sapion (us) and Cro-Magnon (Cave Man) existed during the same time period, but the Sapien basically wiped them out (direct conflict or simply ressource denial)... and those are both 'man'...
So in short, it doesn't happen because science doesn't support it... Sci-Fi tries to stick to scientific explanation (loosely).