What i'm trying to get across is the distinction between when a film can be tolerated for its gory sections for a meaningful purpose and when its just to get a rise out of the audience. It is right to use such a sensative subject and use the latter? Saw is gory for the sake of just being gory, right? but some films can use gore in a professional way.
I think he needs to be very careful at least by this point. yes he as every right to make it, though his reasoning seems to be a bit flawed. Yes those things did happen and were horrific to the extreme. i just have images of Boll doing something wrong, one way or another if it ever gets released.
I think he needs to be very careful at least by this point. yes he as every right to make it, though his reasoning seems to be a bit flawed. Yes those things did happen and were horrific to the extreme. i just have images of Boll doing something wrong, one way or another if it ever gets released.