Why the belief Digimon copied pokemon?

Recommended Videos

TheRightToArmBears

New member
Dec 13, 2008
8,674
0
0
Well, on the face of it the two franchises are remarkably similar, and Pokemon was (and still is) more popular, an people will always accuse the lesser-known one of copying the well known one.

Simple.

But pokemon was better.
 

AllLagNoFrag

New member
Jun 7, 2010
544
0
0
Really? I did not even hear about it. I just saw Digimon and Pokemon as 2 totally different things. Even the style was different to me. Anyway, its probably becuz Pokemon was more popular and came out a little earlier.
 

Guffe

New member
Jul 12, 2009
5,106
0
0
I think why people say that Digimon copied Pokemon was because Pokemon sued Digimon for copying them and they got, what 8 million from that sue? So is that proof that even one of the highest authorities in Japan thought that Pokemon had enough proof against Digimon that they were able to sue them in court an win!!!
I watched Pokemon and very very very little Digimon in my time, I was just more fond of Pokemon, no idea why.
 

blinkgun96

New member
Dec 15, 2008
325
0
0
KiruTheMant said:
But really the only thing they share is the monster angle,and that could mean godzeera was the original pokemon.
Who the hell is godzeera?

Also, I dont believe that I've always thought that pokemon, and digimon were similar in name because of english translation. Though I'm sure a few pages were taken from the others book.
 

KeyMaster45

Gone Gonzo
Jun 16, 2008
2,846
0
0
blinkgun96 said:
Who the hell is godzeera?
Godzeera = Godzilla in a very thick and racist Asian accent. This dialect is also sometimes referred to as "Engrish".

To be honest, until I saw a thread speaking from the other side of this argument (that digimon ripped off pokemon and the OP was angry about it) I never noticed much similarities between them and frankly didn't care. I mean oh sure when a friend of mine was explaining the show to me (this was before I ever saw an episode) back in the third grade I distinctly remember asking him "So it's like pokemon?" which he responded to with "Kinda, but the kids only have one and they can evolve at will." After I sat there trying to understand the concept he just told me to watch an episode the next Saturday and I would understand...He was right.

I like to think both series held an equal place in my heart when it came to being a fan. I couldn't help but look at Pokemon though and realize that Ash was never ever going to win the grand daddy tournament in the particular region he was catching pokemon in. Also that James was flamingly gay and Jessie was his bossy hag. (kinda like Karen and Jack from Will & Grace)

I'd look at Digimon on the other hand and see a plot; a plot that at my young age was utterly enthralling. I mean hell, Digimon didn't screw around when it came to mortality.I seem to remember them killing an evil digimon or killing Padomon for shits and giggles on a routine basis.(I think I almost lost it when they killed Wizardmon) Oh, and those first set of movies they released, kicked so much ass that to this day are full of win. Were the names of the digimon particularly imaginative, pfft they were down right terrible in some cases. Cripes I mentioned one earlier that was Wizardmon, you know what he did and was? He was an f'ing wizard that resembled Vivi from FF9 and did wizardy things for people.

In short, both were part of my childhood and played different roles. Pokemon was my time-sink and Digimon was my first cohesive television series. I frankly don't care if there was copying involved.
 

Ivan Brogstog

New member
Jul 24, 2009
32
0
0
I remember the Digimon hand-held games in school (everyone had them!) before GameBoy's Pokemon was popular at lunchtime. I always felt that digimon stole the concept behind tamogotchis... but made them available to a male audience.

The difference; you actually looked after your Digimon [Sure, you took your Pokemon to the Poke-Centres when they were low on health - and used antidotes, etc. when they were posioned] but you had to feed your Digimon and clean-up after it.

I think the TV anime series revealed the similarities between the two worlds (poke and digi) for me but I liked both.

Pokemon definately out-lasted Digimon, no doubt about it. But the hand-held games were totally different (apart from the orginal Pokemon also being in black and white contrast) and there was only ever so long before starting a new Digimon egg [because you killed your last Monster] got boring.
 

KiruTheMant

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,946
0
0
A Mad Monk 2 said:
well digimon kinda did suck compared to pokemon.
the reason i probly hate it so much is that people would like digmon over pokemon just because pokemon was super popular at the time
Alright,3 things.

1. Hate what?You didn't clarify.
2. Once again,this isn't a favoritist/***** thread. Please don't spark it (even if the thread died)
3. Please note 2.
 

KiruTheMant

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,946
0
0
Ivan Brogstog said:
I remember the Digimon hand-held games in school (everyone had them!) before GameBoy's Pokemon was popular at lunchtime. I always felt that digimon stole the concept behind tamogotchis... but made them available to a male audience.

The difference; you actually looked after your Digimon [Sure, you took your Pokemon to the Poke-Centres when they were low on health - and used antidotes, etc. when they were posioned] but you had to feed your Digimon and clean-up after it.

I think the TV anime series revealed the similarities between the two worlds (poke and digi) for me but I liked both.

Pokemon definately out-lasted Digimon, no doubt about it. But the hand-held games were totally different (apart from the orginal Pokemon also being in black and white contrast) and there was only ever so long before starting a new Digimon egg [because you killed your last Monster] got boring.
Ah details. I enjoy them.
 
Apr 29, 2010
4,148
0
0
Well, they both end in the suffix -mon, they both involve monsters and children using said monsters to fight other monsters, they both had trading card games, tv shows, and video games. The monsters in both series evolved into stronger monsters, the relationship between child and monster was, for the most part, a mutually beneficial one(in a you help me, I help you kind of way).

But, at least Digimon could actually talk. Oh, and Meowth.
 

KiruTheMant

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,946
0
0
superbatranger said:
Well, they both end in the suffix -mon, they both involve monsters and children using said monsters to fight other monsters, they both had trading card games, tv shows, and video games. The monsters in both series evolved into stronger monsters, the relationship between child and monster was, for the most part, a mutually beneficial one(in a you help me, I help you kind of way).

But, at least Digimon could actually talk. Oh, and Meowth.
\

Card Games pop up everywhere, I remember a year or two ago,seeing a Bleach,Naruto,and other kinds of card games. Video games aren't so rare,but the shows are their key parts.
 

KiruTheMant

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,946
0
0
Breaker deGodot said:
Kind of an odd question; just one look at the premise will tell you that it's the same shit.
An odd question is why is that spider wearing roller blades and using an umbrella to bake flapjacks. The point of this thread is to gather information,not get ones opinions of what show is better,so PLEASE REPHRASE THE ANSWER MY GOOD SIR >:|
 

Breaker deGodot

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,204
0
0
KiruTheMant said:
Breaker deGodot said:
Kind of an odd question; just one look at the premise will tell you that it's the same shit.
An odd question is why is that spider wearing roller blades and using an umbrella to bake flapjacks. The point of this thread is to gather information,not get ones opinions of what show is better,so PLEASE REPHRASE THE ANSWER MY GOOD SIR >:|
You're right, that is an odd question. And I apologize, that was my hatred of both shows talking. What I meant was that their premises are extremely similar.
 

KiruTheMant

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,946
0
0
peteron85 said:
Pokemon came out earlier. Not only that, it is much, much better.
1. Another biased Answer that dosen't pretain to the topic.
2. YOU HAVE A POKEMON AVATAR,LIKE I HAVE A DIGIMON AVATAR,Please just answer the bloody question.
 

Daveman

has tits and is on fire
Jan 8, 2009
4,202
0
0
Well for me it's the evolving. Both had evolving monsters not just plain monsters. That's my beef.
 

Antendo

Regular Member
Feb 8, 2010
43
0
11
It must be the "kids with monsters fighting monsters"-theme, the -mon in both the names and the fact that both monsters could evolve into something (usually) bigger and stronger. That much everybody knew, and that's all the info everyone wanted. Unless they were fans.

A bit offtopic-y, but the dub is the real reason pokemon was considered better than digimon in finland: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDJiRmnwA_Q&feature=related
 

zehydra

New member
Oct 25, 2009
5,033
0
0
Wahful said:
I don't think that it copied pokemon as such i think it just seen the success that it was having and thought "Ima get me some of that".

Which happens with allot of things really.
So, you're saying... You don't think they copied them, but they saw what they did and said, "let's do that!" ?