Why the fuck is Lindsey Lohan not in jail

Recommended Videos

LordFisheh

New member
Dec 31, 2008
478
0
0
The thing I don't get with hard drug use is the source. These 'people' write bloody books about their struggle with the horrible horrors of addiction and their own personal hell of fame and money. But I'd say the real hell is experienced by the poor sod being tortured by a Mexican drug lord. They pay their dealers money that they know will filter through to murderers and torturers, but they don't give a shit. Worse, neither do any of the people who fling thousands of pounds their way for their latest biographical whinge-fest on how hard it is to be filthy rich, famous and, seemingly, immune to the laws that constrain us mortals.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
I hate to be the one to point this out, but it was Paris that was filmed without underwear getting out of a car first, later Britney, then Lindsay. J-lo did that before Paris, but it didn't take off.

Having said that...who cares? Follow me round with a camera 24-7 and something embarassing will end up on the net of me. Maybe less people will masturbate to it though.

...

Lindsay Lohan isn't in prison because she's not done anything that prison worthy. Sure, she's the fallen celeb we all love to hate, but that's not a crime. She's only guilty of minor offences, that if she wasn't a celeb nobody would care about (might only be true if they can affod the best lawyes like she can, though).

Wanting her to be locked up is judging celebs more harshly than others...there are those who argue this is warranted for role models, though. But she's a celeb cause people care what she does, without the ravenous hordes of "fans", nobody would care.
 

everythingbeeps

New member
Sep 30, 2011
946
0
0
thaluikhain said:
I hate to be the one to point this out, but it was Paris that was filmed without underwear getting out of a car first, later Britney, then Lindsay. J-lo did that before Paris, but it didn't take off.

Having said that...who cares? Follow me round with a camera 24-7 and something embarassing will end up on the net of me. Maybe less people will masturbate to it though.

...

Lindsay Lohan isn't in prison because she's not done anything that prison worthy. Sure, she's the fallen celeb we all love to hate, but that's not a crime. She's only guilty of minor offences, that if she wasn't a celeb nobody would care about (might only be true if they can affod the best lawyes like she can, though).

Wanting her to be locked up is judging celebs more harshly than others...there are those who argue this is warranted for role models, though. But she's a celeb cause people care what she does, without the ravenous hordes of "fans", nobody would care.
Well no. Technically she HAS done things that are prison-worthy, in that they're illegal and punishable by prison-time.

You may think they're too minor to really be worth prison, but so are a lot of crimes people go to prison for.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
CODE-D said:
Seriously, girls had her chances in life and keeps abusing them. If it were any normal person they wouldve been put in the pokey for years.
Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian.....they make this thing called life an imbalanced equation. They shove karma in buddhas face and then shit stomp on the fat guy. I beg for something bad to happen to them and Lohan is the closest I have, but she keeps evading capture worse than a fucking chansey. Grrrrrrrrrr...(rant)
So what do you think, would you jail her? She stole an expensive necklace or something and keeps missing court dates and community service and still gets chances......in short, shit be whack yo.
So, you're more concerned for some celebrity not being in jail than non-celebrities who aren't in jail for the same thing?