Why the hate?

Recommended Videos

=HCFS=Discoman

New member
Jan 1, 2010
178
0
0
I have been seeing this a lot lately, so I need to ask: why is there all the hate towards EA?
They may not be the greatest company, and like every company that makes games, I could always nitpick about stuff. But I have a bunch of newer games and (somewhere) I have some games from my childhood that all have the big EA logo on them.
Asassin's Creed has, as a series, been fun. Dragon Age has, as a series, been interesting. Battlefield series has some of the best multiplayer of any FPS I have ever seen. They made licensed games of films, such as Harry Potter, which brought fans of those movies into games.

Hell, I have I problem with DLC for one of my games from them, and they are actually trying to help me fix whatever is wrong. Their customer service so far has been quite good.

Yeah, I see people are really hating on the end of Mass Effect 3, but the other two were really good, and they have EA on them. And yet EA won recognition as the Worst Company in America.

How? I am genuinely confused by this. EA, as opposed to,say, Halliburton (example taken from a tweet)?

Thanks for explaining.
 

OneOfTheMichael's

New member
Jul 26, 2010
1,087
0
0
Well my experiance with EA and I don't really have much to say to hate them, as they make most of my favourite game (dragon age, assassins creed). The only company I really don't like too much is activison (and sometimes blizzard as they take all my money). But I don't really know why EA would gain so much hate from their fan boys for the ending to mass effect 3....might be because i haven't played the franchise. Still not a good excuse for them to get dragged down because of it.
 

SargentToughie

New member
Jun 14, 2008
2,580
0
0
Alright, I'm going to come right out and say that I'm part of the 'dislike EA' movement, but saying that they're worse then Bank of America? I swear, some people take this stuff way too seriously. There's a difference between bad business and milking gamers for a few extra bucks, and evicting good people from their homes, plus being a huge reason that the economy went to shit back in 2008.

I think a lot of the hate for EA comes from their recent changes in business policy. They forced Bioware to shove Dragon Age 2 out the door when it was barely in an Alpha build (well, that's just a rumor anyway), but things didn't REALLY start getting out of hand until they stuck their fingers into Mass Effect 3's pie.

I'm past the point of caring at this point, to be totally honest. I'm tired of all this anger and I just kinda want EA fix their stuff and settle down at this point. I mean, they have potential to do a lot of good for the industry, if they'd just stop rushing development and forcing microtransactions.

Origin could be a genuine competitor against Steam, something to force innovation and better service, but that's never going to happen until EA actually grows up and starts taking it seriously.
 

way2sl0w

Resident COD Fanboy
Jan 29, 2012
153
0
0
=HCFS=Discoman said:
But I have a bunch of newer games and (somewhere) I have some games from my childhood that all have the big EA logo on them.
Asassin's Creed has, as a series, been fun.
Assassin's Creed was published by Ubisoft not EA
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
=HCFS=Discoman said:
I have been seeing this a lot lately, so I need to ask: why is there all the hate towards EA?
They may not be the greatest company, and like every company that makes games, I could always nitpick about stuff. But I have a bunch of newer games and (somewhere) I have some games from my childhood that all have the big EA logo on them.
Asassin's Creed has, as a series, been fun. Dragon Age has, as a series, been interesting. Battlefield series has some of the best multiplayer of any FPS I have ever seen. They made licensed games of films, such as Harry Potter, which brought fans of those movies into games.

Hell, I have I problem with DLC for one of my games from them, and they are actually trying to help me fix whatever is wrong. Their customer service so far has been quite good.

Yeah, I see people are really hating on the end of Mass Effect 3, but the other two were really good, and they have EA on them. And yet EA won recognition as the Worst Company in America.

How? I am genuinely confused by this. EA, as opposed to,say, Halliburton (example taken from a tweet)?

Thanks for explaining.
The issue is EA constantly pushing for more and more money, the way how they are behind a lot of the current trends towards microtransactions, day #1 DLC, and similar practices has had people POed at them for years. Gamers ultimalty being put in a "pay more, or go without" position which constantly seems to be increasing, with this being done by a company that is already making scads of money and doesn't really need to increase it's profit margins.

What might be smart business, is not nessicatly something that the customers are going to like even if they wind up going along with it.

The thing with "Haliburton" or "Bank Of America" and other assorted companies is that their mechinitions rarely come into your home the way EA's do. What's more when "Bank Of America" has tried to institute various scams to make more money and people have protested, it has backed down, where EA generally has not. Things like Haliburton and Blackwater might be bastards, but on a certain level people *DO* understand that a lot of what they are doing in other countries is a nessicary evil. Thus while people might complain and make a big stink, at the end of the day these companies actually do very little to them directly, and on some levels people might actually benefit from their antics in an obtuse way.

To put it into perspective, what has Bank Of America or Haliburton actually done to YOU recently that you can point a direct finger at, and say "this sucked". A lot of people aren't going to be able to find anything, and even if they can, millions of people are liable to think back and find more situations where they have been POed at EA over the last year or two than any other company. Mass Effect 3 had it's craptastic ending, but also had it's day #1 DLC contreversy, and the same can be said of microtransactions that have been attached to nearly every EA product for years now... not to mention forcing millions of people onto their "Origin" service which is totally borked.

Speaking for myself, when ToR came out EA screwed up their pre-order codes with Gamestop. I purchused a collector's edition, but the code Gamestop gave me was for a regular edition. Something I did not realize until after I input the code on their site since the receipt didn't specify. This happened to a lot of people apparently. EA *DID* correct the problem and I received a proper collector's edition code, *BUT* I could no longer insert it into my account because you can't register two versions of the same product. Tech support told me the only way to resolve this was to create a second account, and they would later figure out a way to merge them. I did this, and wound up with two EA accounts, one with ToR and the other with all my other EA games. I have to switch between Origin logins depending on what I play, and due to this being annoying I've screwed up and installed things like Kingdoms of Amalur into my ToR account by accident. This becomes annoying because when EA does cross promotions like getting the Todd Mcfarlane weapons and armor for ME3 I can't do it when my games are under seperate accounts, and even seperated I can't seem to DL and play things like the Amalur Demo when I already own a full version of the game (I've tried). When I've contacted Tech support about account merger after all these months I get non-answers. Last time I tried I got no response, and then some automated query checking back with me "because they hadn't heard from me recently regarding this issue" when they never responded to begin with.

The point of my story is that I doubt I'm the only one here since the ToR forums were full of people with the same Gamestop order issues at one point, and it's wall-punchingly annoying. Where Bank Of America has tried to sneak in fees (and then gave up under protest), EA manages to pretty much piss me off on a daily basis. Haliburton I can at least get, they are bastards but it doesn't come into my home much. EA on the other hand aren't just bastards, they are basically too lazy to even support their own products and fix their mistakes (of a sort that go beyond the ME3 ending issue... they won't even make things right with this forced account splitting which happened because they told me too).

So yeah... I back EA as worst company in the US (if not globally), and I can see why a lot of other people on an internet survey would do the same thing. The very fact that EA doesn't seem to give a crap just reinforces the point of why they deserve that dubious "honor". A company that gets told that and then has the audacity to point at it's numbe rof customers (overlooking that the people complaining are those same customers) is pretty much sinking to all time lows.
 

Beautiful End

New member
Feb 15, 2011
1,755
0
0
Well, personally, my dislike, not hate, for them came from the Online Passes. I don't exactly hate them as much as I wish because I will still keep buying their games if they're any good (USED! OLOLOL! GameStop gives online passes for free anyway when you buy used).

Anyway, I hate the fact that they're forcing me to buy what and when to buy their products. They're limiting my freedom as a consumer.
Also, Day one DLC. We all know publishers will try to find a way to make more money to make up for the used sales, those poor, defenseless babies. But you know, at least try to pretend you're not doing that. Wait a couple of weeks, use a smokescreen, whatever.
The quality of their games is decreasing. It's not like they're horrible, but I personally got used to a certain level of finesse coming from these guys. And I don't see it there anymore.

Those are my reasons as weak or as strong as they might be.
 

SargentToughie

New member
Jun 14, 2008
2,580
0
0
Beautiful End said:
The quality of their games is decreasing. It's not like they're horrible, but I personally got used to a certain level of finesse coming from these guys. And I don't see it there anymore.
Yeah, remember that supposed 'skyrim slayer' that EA was supposed to publish, Kingdoms of Amalur? Yeah, well I was dumb enough to buy into the hype about it and bought the game full price... Played about 6 hours of it's hacky slashy 'enemies spot you from a mile away even though you're a rogue with 4 points in stealth' gameplay and called it quits.

It just comes off as a slower paced and more pretentious Dynasty Warriors game to me.
 

Rawne1980

New member
Jul 29, 2011
4,144
0
0
=HCFS=Discoman said:
Asassin's Creed has, as a series, been fun.
And you can still think that while calling EA the devil.

Assassins Creed is from Ubisoft, EA had nothing to do with it.
 

=HCFS=Discoman

New member
Jan 1, 2010
178
0
0
way2sl0w said:
=HCFS=Discoman said:
But I have a bunch of newer games and (somewhere) I have some games from my childhood that all have the big EA logo on them.
Asassin's Creed has, as a series, been fun.
Assassin's Creed was published by Ubisoft not EA
That explains why I have not had a problem-I'm being too much of an idiot to notice a problem :)
 
Jun 16, 2010
1,153
0
0
=HCFS=Discoman said:
way2sl0w said:
=HCFS=Discoman said:
But I have a bunch of newer games and (somewhere) I have some games from my childhood that all have the big EA logo on them.
Asassin's Creed has, as a series, been fun.
Assassin's Creed was published by Ubisoft not EA
That explains why I have not had a problem-I'm being too much of an idiot to notice a problem :)
Also, EA had nothing to do with Mass Effect. EA only got involved during Mass Effect 2's development, notably just before the series started to get excessively "streamlined"/dumbed down.

Pre-EA: Everything that is good about Mass Effect
Post-EA: Very limited amount of weapons, zero weapon modification, reduced range of skills, extremely reduced exploration, emphasis on cover-based shooting, inclusion of characters based on Jersey Shore personalities and PSP-licking journalists, extreme mishandling of primary antagonists (the Reapers' motivations are retconned to make them seem stupid for no reason), retarded ending.
 

madster11

New member
Aug 17, 2010
476
0
0
Ubisoft and EA are the scum of the video game world.

Old EA, say early to mid 2000's (Think the good NFS era) was an awesome company that produced good games. Modern EA is a company that does NOTHING but try to make as much profit as is physically possible while not caring about how much damage they're doing to the industry.
This is before we get onto what the scum do to other companies.

Ubisoft are just douches in general, but at least they actually care about making good games while telling everyone who buys them to go fuck themselves, instead of releasing the same game 20 times and then cutting out 1/5th the content and selling it as DLC.
 

=HCFS=Discoman

New member
Jan 1, 2010
178
0
0
Therumancer said:
The issue is EA constantly pushing for more and more money, the way how they are behind a lot of the current trends towards microtransactions, day #1 DLC, and similar practices has had people POed at them for years. Gamers ultimalty being put in a "pay more, or go without" position which constantly seems to be increasing, with this being done by a company that is already making scads of money and doesn't really need to increase it's profit margins.

To put it into perspective, what has Bank Of America or Haliburton actually done to YOU recently that you can point a direct finger at, and say "this sucked". A lot of people aren't going to be able to find anything, and even if they can, millions of people are liable to think back and find more situations where they have been POed at EA over the last year or two than any other company. Mass Effect 3 had it's craptastic ending, but also had it's day #1 DLC contreversy, and the same can be said of microtransactions that have been attached to nearly every EA product for years now... not to mention forcing millions of people onto their "Origin" service which is totally borked.

Speaking for myself, when ToR came out EA screwed up their pre-order codes with Gamestop. I purchused a collector's edition, but the code Gamestop gave me was for a regular edition. Something I did not realize until after I input the code on their site since the receipt didn't specify. This happened to a lot of people apparently. EA *DID* correct the problem and I received a proper collector's edition code, *BUT* I could no longer insert it into my account because you can't register two versions of the same product. Tech support told me the only way to resolve this was to create a second account, and they would later figure out a way to merge them. I did this, and wound up with two EA accounts, one with ToR and the other with all my other EA games. I have to switch between Origin logins depending on what I play, and due to this being annoying I've screwed up and installed things like Kingdoms of Amalur into my ToR account by accident. This becomes annoying because when EA does cross promotions like getting the Todd Mcfarlane weapons and armor for ME3 I can't do it when my games are under seperate accounts, and even seperated I can't seem to DL and play things like the Amalur Demo when I already own a full version of the game (I've tried). When I've contacted Tech support about account merger after all these months I get non-answers. Last time I tried I got no response, and then some automated query checking back with me "because they hadn't heard from me recently regarding this issue" when they never responded to begin with.

The point of my story is that I doubt I'm the only one here since the ToR forums were full of people with the same Gamestop order issues at one point, and it's wall-punchingly annoying. Where Bank Of America has tried to sneak in fees (and then gave up under protest), EA manages to pretty much piss me off on a daily basis. Haliburton I can at least get, they are bastards but it doesn't come into my home much. EA on the other hand aren't just bastards, they are basically too lazy to even support their own products and fix their mistakes (of a sort that go beyond the ME3 ending issue... they won't even make things right with this forced account splitting which happened because they told me too).

So yeah... I back EA as worst company in the US (if not globally), and I can see why a lot of other people on an internet survey would do the same thing. The very fact that EA doesn't seem to give a crap just reinforces the point of why they deserve that dubious "honor". A company that gets told that and then has the audacity to point at it's numbe rof customers (overlooking that the people complaining are those same customers) is pretty much sinking to all time lows.
Extra Creditz covered the day 1 DLC, and I can say it is one of their few things that I agree with. If you do have a point where the dev team is unable to work on the game, such as it being sent for testing on the various platforms and certification that it works and meets the standards, them why not start making DLC?
I have had the thing where I have had games that I would rather pay a few bucks for some cool extras now instead of months later. After all, more people do buy dlc the sooner it is released, so it makes sense from a monetary perspective. Plus, that is more people who gain something else to enjoy in a game, and that isn't bad either.
I had forgotten that microtransaction thing with the original Battlefield:Bad Company, where it became pay to win. Yeah, that sucked. It isn't like they then went and added buyable weapon packs to any other games, like Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 3. Oh wait, they did.
Well, they are weapons you do unlock eventually, so really, they suck a few bucks off of people who want the stuff now instead of later, which are generally the people who just want to have fun for a bit then move on to something else. I had my fun with Bad Company 2, and I am nowhere near having all the good stuff unlocked. And I will be happy to never play that game for at least a couple more years. In that regard, five bucks for the cool stuff would have made that fun time a fun time with cool stuff, and five bucks spent to have fun with cool stuff instead of less cool starting stuff.
After all, the weapons are balanced so as not to be overpowered, where you could then pay to win.
and microtransactions? seriously? most games with those are free to play and free to get. For some of the things they offer, forking over a couple bucks to the developers as thanks and getting something is nice.
"Hey, I love your game. Have some money."
"Thanks! Here, have some stuff in return."
"Sweet!"

Honestly, my big peeve is pay to buy and pay to play games. Not only do you ahve to buy it, but you then have to pay for the privilege of playing a game that you already own. Battlefield has free multiplayer with a $60 game. Warcraft is a $15 a month multiplayer, plus the cost of the game.
Honestly, I buy a game, then I can't play it unless I continue to pay? There is no game so good I should have to continue to pay every month for the privilege of playing it. Honestly, I dislike Blizzard and CCP much more than EA. At least EA doesn't charge you a monthly fee to own their games.
And it's why I dislike the iPhone: $20 a month JUST TO OWN ONE. That doesn't count the mandatory unlimited data plan (naturally the most expensive one) and the mandatory mid level or better service plan if you ever want to use the phone.
Service fees there are fine. But charging me for the privilege of owning your product is just over the top.
 

infinity_turtles

New member
Apr 17, 2010
800
0
0
They buy companies that make good games, and most of those companies then either stop making good games or stop making them altogether. As for the recent surge of it though, most of the Bioware disappointment ha been blamed on EA.
 

Flailing Escapist

New member
Apr 13, 2011
1,602
0
0
I remember reading a column (I think on Cracked) where the columnist brought up that one thing consoles have on PCs is accessablity and how easy it is to just "pop in a disk and play". I realized how I forgot that's the very reason I have a 360 (and costs) but recently with, so many companies, it's taking longer and longer to actually play the game. I remember being surprised a couple weeks ago when I booted my gamecube up, put in a game and it started auto-playing. I was stunned because my 360 isn't on auto-play because I have so many arcade games that I like to play it's easier to go straight to menu (or advertisements r' us) than it is to autoplay then go to menu. No updates, no ads and I realized why my gamecube autoplayed; I didn't need to go to the menu, I had the entire game right there.
Edit: Oh yeah, moral of this paragraph: do you know how long it took between me putting ME3 in my 360 and actually playing ME3? Or DA2? Dead Space 2? TOO LONG! This isn't specific to EA but they've been doing it with all their games recently and they'll continue too.

Before I go on too much of a rant I'll just say that I'm not a fan of EA because of all the online passes, the unneccesary dlc (the fact that they go into games with no doubt that they're going to make dlc for them bugs me too), the constant updates oh and all the rushed games + running several of my favorite devs into the ground but I digress. There's just a general disconnect from EA and everybody else (who isn't 12 or a moron or 12).

I don't get when companies don't get that making us happy makes them more money. Especially when our happiness is such an easy thing to generate. It almost feels like they're trying to piss us off.
 

DoPo

"You're not cleared for that."
Jan 30, 2012
8,665
0
0
=HCFS=Discoman said:
Asassin's Creed has, as a series, been fun.
Mentioned already - nothing to do with EA.

=HCFS=Discoman said:
Dragon Age has, as a series, been interesting.
The first one was OK. Also, I am pretty sure it development was started before EA was involved. The second one I hear is inferior compared to the first one. That came out when BioWare was entirely under EA control.

=HCFS=Discoman said:
Battlefield series has some of the best multiplayer of any FPS I have ever seen.
I have no actual clue of BF as I don't play it. And I have zero interest, so I have no idea how the quality is going.

=HCFS=Discoman said:
They made licensed games of films, such as Harry Potter, which brought fans of those movies into games.
My personal feelings on this is that I don't know why you are showing this as such a good thing. It's not like it's hard for people to go into gaming. So I don't think "I made some people pick up some video game" earns them any points. Also (and that's totally subjective - I haven't verified it) movie games usually suck giant balls.

But you didn't list nearly all issues with EA. Origin received an enormous amount of criticism. And some of it justly. It has been improving but initially it was just bad way worse than Steam ever was.

But even before that, there is their whole advertisement strategy. Extra Credits had to devote a whole episode basically saying "Bad, EA! Bad! No, stay down." and you know how soft and good those guys are.

Day 1 DLC, while not an issue by itself, raises concerns when EA is known (or is rumoured) to hold back content deliberately to charge for it later (and at a greater price).

And there is the problem with studios they've acquired. There is a nasty tendency of some good studios to die relatively quickly after EA gets them. But of course, the IP stays with EA, so...it's not all good.

Speaking of IP, sometimes EA will buy a studio only for a popular franchise they produce and try to do a quick cash-in on the games.

Further on IP, they practically monopolised sports games, so they can release pretty much the same thing every year for free money. There is no competition and there are always people to buy them.

And add to that their overall tendency to view games only in terms of business and money. Which is another thing that is not bad by itself, it only becomes bad when they actually turn their back on the entire philosophy of their company in favour of more money. Electronic. Arts. They used to be one of the good guys. They used to be doing it for the art - to make games and to make good, meaningful, touching games. Now there is none of that left.

I may have missed some issues but what you portrayed in the OP is not their only failing. As you can see there are lots.
 

Hero in a half shell

It's not easy being green
Dec 30, 2009
4,286
0
0
Fr said:
anc[is]Go ask Bullfrog, Westwood, or Pandemic that question. Oh wait...
Oh lord, don't remind me.

WESTWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD! In the name of Kane I will avenge you. KANE LIVES IN DEATH!

Oh, sorry, I get a bit carried away sometimes. Yeah, EA have a terrible track record for buying up small games companies that have gained a reputation for creating well polished, innovative and (most importantly of all) fun, game franchises. They then water down those franchises to appeal to a broader audience- to make more money, and ruin any creativity

Using Westwood as an example, they basically wrote the book on Real Time Strategy games through their game Dune 2, and then made the Command and Conquer series, which was for a while the definitive RTS series. I cannot emphasis how much Westwood pushed the boundaries on videogames as a whole: They essentially created RTS games, they were the first people to use live action in video cutscenes, and the very first C&C game came with 2 disks of the game, so you could play your friends on a LAN. I'll repeat that, they gave you 2 copies of the game so you could play with your friends THAT'S FANTASTIC! It had 150 employees, and just before it was bought out, it held 5 to 6% of the entire PC gamer market. In contrast EA themselves, at the same time, who were the largest game developers back then, only had an 11% share. That's how awesome Westwoods games were. That's how awesome Westwood were.

And when EA bought them over? Their games were given unrealistic deadlines that lead to corners being cut, features left out, etc. And EA's higher ups got their grubby fingers into every inch of the creation process, changing things, denying innovation, demanding it be made for the ever ominously vague "wider audience" and generally just being manipulative asses. Westwood had a 5 year contract with EA, and as soon as it was up their studios were dissolved, and the fetid tatters of their once brilliant franchises were divided amongst their lobotomised peons to fill with their own dumbed down bile and misunderstand the very point of the whole damn franchise. I'm looking at you, C&C 4, with your random romance story and complete lack of base building!

And that's why I hate EA.

Boy, that was a good rant. I'll have to do that more often.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
=HCFS=Discoman said:
Therumancer said:
The issue is EA constantly pushing for more and more money, the way how they are behind a lot of the current trends towards microtransactions, day #1 DLC, and similar practices has had people POed at them for years. Gamers ultimalty being put in a "pay more, or go without" position which constantly seems to be increasing, with this being done by a company that is already making scads of money and doesn't really need to increase it's profit margins.

To put it into perspective, what has Bank Of America or Haliburton actually done to YOU recently that you can point a direct finger at, and say "this sucked". A lot of people aren't going to be able to find anything, and even if they can, millions of people are liable to think back and find more situations where they have been POed at EA over the last year or two than any other company. Mass Effect 3 had it's craptastic ending, but also had it's day #1 DLC contreversy, and the same can be said of microtransactions that have been attached to nearly every EA product for years now... not to mention forcing millions of people onto their "Origin" service which is totally borked.

Speaking for myself, when ToR came out EA screwed up their pre-order codes with Gamestop. I purchused a collector's edition, but the code Gamestop gave me was for a regular edition. Something I did not realize until after I input the code on their site since the receipt didn't specify. This happened to a lot of people apparently. EA *DID* correct the problem and I received a proper collector's edition code, *BUT* I could no longer insert it into my account because you can't register two versions of the same product. Tech support told me the only way to resolve this was to create a second account, and they would later figure out a way to merge them. I did this, and wound up with two EA accounts, one with ToR and the other with all my other EA games. I have to switch between Origin logins depending on what I play, and due to this being annoying I've screwed up and installed things like Kingdoms of Amalur into my ToR account by accident. This becomes annoying because when EA does cross promotions like getting the Todd Mcfarlane weapons and armor for ME3 I can't do it when my games are under seperate accounts, and even seperated I can't seem to DL and play things like the Amalur Demo when I already own a full version of the game (I've tried). When I've contacted Tech support about account merger after all these months I get non-answers. Last time I tried I got no response, and then some automated query checking back with me "because they hadn't heard from me recently regarding this issue" when they never responded to begin with.

The point of my story is that I doubt I'm the only one here since the ToR forums were full of people with the same Gamestop order issues at one point, and it's wall-punchingly annoying. Where Bank Of America has tried to sneak in fees (and then gave up under protest), EA manages to pretty much piss me off on a daily basis. Haliburton I can at least get, they are bastards but it doesn't come into my home much. EA on the other hand aren't just bastards, they are basically too lazy to even support their own products and fix their mistakes (of a sort that go beyond the ME3 ending issue... they won't even make things right with this forced account splitting which happened because they told me too).

So yeah... I back EA as worst company in the US (if not globally), and I can see why a lot of other people on an internet survey would do the same thing. The very fact that EA doesn't seem to give a crap just reinforces the point of why they deserve that dubious "honor". A company that gets told that and then has the audacity to point at it's numbe rof customers (overlooking that the people complaining are those same customers) is pretty much sinking to all time lows.
Extra Creditz covered the day 1 DLC, and I can say it is one of their few things that I agree with. If you do have a point where the dev team is unable to work on the game, such as it being sent for testing on the various platforms and certification that it works and meets the standards, them why not start making DLC?
I have had the thing where I have had games that I would rather pay a few bucks for some cool extras now instead of months later. After all, more people do buy dlc the sooner it is released, so it makes sense from a monetary perspective. Plus, that is more people who gain something else to enjoy in a game, and that isn't bad either.
I had forgotten that microtransaction thing with the original Battlefield:Bad Company, where it became pay to win. Yeah, that sucked. It isn't like they then went and added buyable weapon packs to any other games, like Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 3. Oh wait, they did.
Well, they are weapons you do unlock eventually, so really, they suck a few bucks off of people who want the stuff now instead of later, which are generally the people who just want to have fun for a bit then move on to something else. I had my fun with Bad Company 2, and I am nowhere near having all the good stuff unlocked. And I will be happy to never play that game for at least a couple more years. In that regard, five bucks for the cool stuff would have made that fun time a fun time with cool stuff, and five bucks spent to have fun with cool stuff instead of less cool starting stuff.
After all, the weapons are balanced so as not to be overpowered, where you could then pay to win.
and microtransactions? seriously? most games with those are free to play and free to get. For some of the things they offer, forking over a couple bucks to the developers as thanks and getting something is nice.
"Hey, I love your game. Have some money."
"Thanks! Here, have some stuff in return."
"Sweet!"

Honestly, my big peeve is pay to buy and pay to play games. Not only do you ahve to buy it, but you then have to pay for the privilege of playing a game that you already own. Battlefield has free multiplayer with a $60 game. Warcraft is a $15 a month multiplayer, plus the cost of the game.
Honestly, I buy a game, then I can't play it unless I continue to pay? There is no game so good I should have to continue to pay every month for the privilege of playing it. Honestly, I dislike Blizzard and CCP much more than EA. At least EA doesn't charge you a monthly fee to own their games.
And it's why I dislike the iPhone: $20 a month JUST TO OWN ONE. That doesn't count the mandatory unlimited data plan (naturally the most expensive one) and the mandatory mid level or better service plan if you ever want to use the phone.
Service fees there are fine. But charging me for the privilege of owning your product is just over the top.

The thing is that Extra Credits was largely talking about cosmetic additions to the game, which would be purchused seperatly. Not a situation where they would include substantial game content on the disc and then lock it out, or actual additional, fully playable, and coded content, that is being released at the time of the game coming out.

Their arguement was basically about artists having little to do while the coders, animators, and other fellows were still working on the game.

To use "Mass Effect 3" as an example because it's what everyone is talking about, their whole "From The Ashes" thing was ready to go as of Day #1 of the games release. That content involved more than just art assets, it included dialogue, animations, writing, map design, and all of those features, which put it well outside of the points I remember "Extra Credits" making. What's more they were able to give it to people buying the "Collector's Edition" for free so including it with all versions of the game was obviously viable, especially given the information and plot/storyline details inherant in it.

See, Extra Credits was more talking about stuff like say the old "alternate appearance pack" or whatever for ME2. If you want to pay a buck or three for a couple of new skins that don't do anything, that's generally no big deal, assuming there were decent appearance options to begin with, and truthfully I don't think many people would complain about that or be labeling EA evil as a result, but that isn't what your seeing done here. This isn't just some bored graphics designers with nothing to do.

Serious DLC should be something that comes after the game, period, not be anything especially relevent to it, and released on day #1.

What we're seeing here with EA, and other companies.