Why the Wii won

Recommended Videos

WhyTravisFelt

New member
Oct 2, 2008
30
0
0
I think gaming has gone too far. Last generation we had three options (four depending on how you think the Dreamcast fits in): You had your PS2, which you knew would be a reliable console for third-party gaming. You knew it would probably dwarf the libraries of it's competitors like PS1 dwarfed N64's and Saturn's, but that seventy percent of the games would be like 'Barbie's Beat-mix 3000' or some cheap-o crap, useless crap, and the still enormous thirty percent would consist of plenty of great games. If you went for Gamecube, you were banking on playing plenty of well-established, exclusive game series (serieses?, seri?) and you got Metroid Prime and Windwaker and SSBM and did pretty well. If you got an X-Box, you probably played Halo for a few days until you got bored, had fun using your own entrance music in Raw 2, and then your XBox probably stopped working because it was a piece of shit.

Now, I wouldn't go out and call Wii a winner at anything. It "won" because it's the only videogame system you can buy without taking out a second mortgage. Let's take your average twenty-ish male Wii owner, and for "friendly" purposes, we'll speak in second person. You bought the Wii because you could. You thought it was nifty when you played those Mii games (tennis, find the fastest swimmer, etc) and you liked it because it's the only games your girlfriend will play with you that don't involve a flat, foldable piece of cardboard. But when you're not with her you swear to yourself everytime a multi-console game comes out because you know you're going to get the limpd*ck "shake a stick, wave a chuk" version of the game that's probably going to kick ass on the other two consoles. You realize it doesn't matter to you anyway, because your sensor bar broke and you've realized that piece of "hi-tech" hardware can be be replaced by pointing the wiimote at the lamp, or maybe you will light some candles just long enough to load a gamecube game or Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn, neither of which do you have to gimmick out on.

PS3 and 360 "lost" because one, not everybody can afford a couple of thousands of dollars on a high-definition television and an extra half a thousand on a videogame system. And, two, not everybody wants to pay monthly charges to play against other nerds online. The problem Sony and Microsoft have now that companies didn't have when we were all children, is that nobody has the money for the kind of devotion these companies are looking for. Nintendo released their console at a reasonable price, and the sly bastards got away with murder because they basically just re-released the gamecube with a remote control add-on.

The reality is that nobody won, everybody, most especially your average gamer, has lost.
 

Da_Schwartz

New member
Jul 15, 2008
1,849
0
0
Well i still use my wii for, river city ransom, shining force series and super dodgeball. Last tiem i played a wii game was when mario kart came out..of course using the gamecube troller anyway. And prob wont pick it up again until the new punchout is released, even though i have a pretty good idea how its gonna play already but whatever it's still punchout. Other then that mines collecting dust.
 

Sylocat

Sci-Fi & Shakespeare
Nov 13, 2007
2,122
0
0
kanada514 said:
The main problem with the Wii is the longevity aspect. Will it still be as popular in five years from now? Will it be able to harness the same technological appeal as the other two.
Will ANY of the consoles be as popular in five years?

The Wii is catering to the casual and non-gamers, but at the same time, turns them into players. Those players once they are no longer casual, will upgrade to the console that can offer games for gamers and that actually make use of their HD TV.
You are aware that not every gamer is willing to spend thousands of dollars on an HD-TV, aren't you? Some people don't want to pay that much just to look at shinier graphics in a higher resolution.

We'll see if the Wii wins on the long term, but from what I hear on the forums, Wii owners are slowly by slowly starting to realize that the Wii is treating them like a retard 3-year old and are responding by dropping it.
From what you hear on "the forums?" There are various forums on the web, you know.
 

JediMB

New member
Oct 25, 2008
3,094
0
0
BallPtPenTheif said:
Sewblon said:
The Wii is part of this console generation, the PS2 is not. The
Wii is competing against the PS3 and The Xbox360 and the Wii is winning.
Well that's because you are arbitrarily comparing consoles by release date. But that still doesn't mean that I get a 720p image off of my Wii. As long as PS2s are still selling at retailers than they are in the race as well.
I never got a 480i image off of my PS1. Does that make it prev-gen when compared to the N64?
 

EzraPound

New member
Jan 26, 2008
1,763
0
0
We'll see if the Wii wins on the long term, but from what I hear on the forums, Wii owners are slowly by slowly starting to realize that the Wii is treating them like a retard 3-year old and are responding by dropping it.
Most of those people are idiots, though, that aren't fishing for good third-party titles that exist as a result of the Wii's influx of obscure software. So to most Wii owners, the 'good' games on the console conist of: Zelda. Mario. Metroid. Paper Mario. And SSBB. This is a shame since the oppeness of the Wii with developers (there is no 'certificate of quality', per se) has led to alot of inventive titles by little-known devs - many of whom may not be 'little-known' if they keep up this pace for long.
 

BallPtPenTheif

New member
Jun 11, 2008
1,468
0
0
JediMB said:
BallPtPenTheif said:
Sewblon said:
The Wii is part of this console generation, the PS2 is not. The
Wii is competing against the PS3 and The Xbox360 and the Wii is winning.
Well that's because you are arbitrarily comparing consoles by release date. But that still doesn't mean that I get a 720p image off of my Wii. As long as PS2s are still selling at retailers than they are in the race as well.
I never got a 480i image off of my PS1. Does that make it prev-gen when compared to the N64?
I didn't know they still sold N64s at Walmart. I'm not re-difining the "gen/next-gen" terms, you are missing my point entirely. I am dismissing the gen terms alltogether instead comparing consoles that are still viable sellers in todays market. If you are going to compare sales numbers of Wii to PS3 and 360, then you have thrown technical comparisons out of the window... by your generational critera we might as well throw in sales figures for this years model of the Leap Frog console while we're at it.

As far as I'm concerned the Wii can't support most of the games I play on my consoles and PC so their sales figures are irrelevant to me since I don't have to worry about Bethesda being swayed by sales numbers and releasing Fallout 4 as a Wii exclusive. This isn't a pissing contest, rational people watch sales figures to insure that their invested console has the proper install base to procure future premium titles.
 

mhitman

New member
Sep 10, 2008
348
0
0
nintendo doesn't care about me :'( and i hate my wii, although it is weirdly nostalgic