Why the XBone is a good console

Recommended Videos

Madman123456

New member
Feb 11, 2011
590
0
0
Yes yes, the used games fee is up to the publisher. Well, since we don't even know how high this fee really is, we're ranting because they thought it would be necessary to implement a tool with which publishers can annoy us some more.
"It's like the season pass". You know, that's not really a point in it's favor, right?

The price. I'd be paying more and get additional features, that would be ok if i didn't have these features already or don't want them.

The "evil, spying kinect". I do not believe that the kinect will be used by microsoft to spy on us. I do believe that microsoft said very little about the security of the connection. Like nothing at all. After Sony's little mishap i can not believe that security concerns didn't come up at all.
Microsoft wont be using the kinect to spy on you. Others might.

Also i'm virtually certain that with today's industry, the kinect is going to be implemented in stupid ways. Steel Batalion" was sold at full price and you can not play that. Would've been a nice game but sadly, kinect.

Kinect games don't work right, none of them is as reliable as button mashing on the joypad. Well, i suppose i wont buy that thing then.

I imagine annoying ways in which games will use the kinect. I bet at least some games will annoy people by controls that weren't implemented well. Maybe a shooter where you make a throwing motion to throw a grenade. Might be neat the first few times but it will get old fast.
That is, if the thing works right every time and i very much doubt that.
The new kinect might be better but i don't see it becoming as reliable as a button push.

Next thing: Online. I do not want my console to phone home every day. Maybe the internet connection is not a problem for you but i foresee some times where it might become one. Visiting people and want to bring your console? If they have good wlan you might do so. And if they live in the same country, which is rather annoying for europeans...


The Future: I want my console to be playable in 20 years. current generation wont deliver that, you're lucky if your first model xbox360 works now.
Now it sounds like they might brick the xbone on purpose. "We would never do that!" says some guy with a stupid hat.

Yeah, i do not believe you. After Bullshit about "Cloud processing" i would've made a statement like "When the day finally comes that we switch off the servers we will have disabled the online requirement for the console years in advance. You wont be able to use cloud processing of course so some games might have issues but you will be able to play all the games!".
But nope, evasive bullshit all around so they're keeping the option open. To the Question "will my console be bricked in ten years" i would see a most definitive answer or just have another reason to not buy the thing.
 

Uriain

New member
Apr 8, 2010
290
0
0
mKeRix said:
Hey,
after seeing all the hype around the PS4 and (often even unjust) hate against the XBone I felt like I should post this thread. First of, note that while I'll try to go by facts, I can't be completely objective. I'm fully aware that I'll go against popular opinion with this post, but looking at prior experience with the Escapist forums I hope to find at least a few people who are willing to discuss like proper people and without all the hype.
Now, let's get started. I've been checking different sites over the last few days and have talked to quite a bit of people about the new generation. As Yahtzee already said, you don't have to buy any console, but people feel like they do, so that's what causes these problems. That divides sites into either a PS4 fanbase or an XBone fanbase, because others just don't want to join a thread where people are going wild about the other console.
Let me start off that personally, I think both consoles are good. Both are on par when it comes to technical details and so on, they are just aiming to do different things. And let me note that even if the XBone will fail horribly (more than certain it won't, more about that later), that's not the end of Microsoft. That's just the vocal voices of a few on the internet.
Let's address the main points that people have been criticizing over the last few days: I am going to address each point below with some counter points, I think you bring up some excellent discussion topics though. I will be the "bold" text

1. Used games:
The blockade of selling used games is entirely up to the publisher, so are the fees. What Microsoft has done here is an official way of what already happened before. Remember the Online Passes? That's just like that. Nobody has has to use them. They can. Now, if EA would decide to be a dick and use it - what would happen? They'd do it on every platform. They won't be interested in holding up Sony's image of the messiah console, they want their money. So afaik, it doesn't matter. The possibilities are there on both platforms.

The "blockade" as some call it (and as you have mentioned here) and more about the fact of how a publisher saying "yeah screw you consumer, you gotta pay me to use a game your buddy sold/gave you will come across. Cheeky video aside from Sony, thats how I trade games with people, by actually giving it to them.

2. Game sharing:
After Sony's admittedly hilarious video about sharing games (which was also perceived as childish by some, but I think these little slaps are fun in a way) people have been saying that you won't be able to share games on the XBone. Well, yes and no. You can still share games, you can give your game to up to 10 of your friends without even having to hand them your disc, they'll just have it on their account and can easily download and play it right away. The only thing here is, you need to have them on your friends list for at least 30 days and you can only give them them every game once. But honestly, I don't think that's too limiting. I wouldn't hand out my games to people that I just met either. And if you know them for a while and they just made a new account, then 30 days isn't bad either. Apart from that, I've never seen anyone rent a game twice. If you like it after playing it, you usually just buy it.

Your edit covered this point, and I think its a neat idea for Microsoft to do, the ability to share a game with 1 other person at the same time is cool, and a good way to promote their games to a newer audience. Especially if you have a person like me (the guy who buys all the games/consoles) and has friends who want to try things before they buy them. This should be a bigger selling point for the Xbox one imo.

UPDATE: Mixed this up a little bit, but thankfully [user]9thRequiem[/user] clarified it:
9thRequiem said:
This is two separate things.
One is that up to 10 friends can be in your "Family", and can play your games whenever they like, though each game can only be played by one friend at a time. This is "Sharing" games. I have no idea why this feature isn't widely loved - Share games, with close friends, without needing a disc. If Microsoft went down the Sony route and made a snarky video, maybe things would be clearer.
Separately, there's "Giving" games, which can be done to anyone who's been on your friends list for at least 30 days and can only be done once. After giving someone a game, you no longer have it. This is a much less useful feature, but still beats Steam's game giving.
3. 24h offline time:
This is a point I can't say much about. I can think of many reasons why they'd do such a thing, but there's nothing I really want to defend here. For me it's no problem at all, I like my games and consoles (and PC) for the online multiplayer, but I see why it would bother people. On the other hand, I'm sure this is nothing they couldn't change. It happened before, so you can hope. If you know you'll be offline for longer than a day, then definitely don't buy the XBone yet though.

While I personally don't have an issue with this, I have had the occasional instance of my net going down for 2-3 days due to someone hitting a line, or the smart people at hyrdo severing them while they dig. The issue though DOES come down to the people who may not have a steady connection all the time, or may not have internet at all. Why are they to be punished for not having internet?

4. Evil spying Kinect:
This wrong, just wrong. It has been confirmed that the Kinect can be turned off completely long ago, and you won't be spied. The Kinect itself is also a fairly useful tool, I own a Kinect 1 and there are some fun games for it out there, and it adds functionality by voice commands etc. I know people don't like being forced to get a product, but it's entirely possible that there will be an "Arcade" edition like with the 360, which is cheaper and delivered without Kinect. "Why did Microsoft do this in the first place?" you could ask now. To prevent segmentation. This way everyone has the same setup and games can be designed in that way. Apart from that I believe that if people don't try something new over time, things can't evolve.

While I personally think the Kinect, in any format is still a gimmick waiting for a truely good idea, the idea of it being able to see me at all times unless I specifically turn it off is not a pleasant one. I already plan on putting a patch over the camera or facing it away from me as I don't need to be recorded/viewed while I am playing. Maybe paranoid, maybe silly, but when it feels like your home is being surveyed by your toys, its time to really re-think the steps you took to get there. About the "segmentation" I personally disagree with that. While its a very tiny test size, I know around 200 people (work, social, xbl) who have a kinect. nearly all of them say the voice commands for pausing a movie is the best thing about it. to say "Xbox pause" or tap the start button on the controller takes the same amount of time/energy, and to me that is where the functionality of it ends.

5. Hardware:
The hardware isn't too different, really. You have about the same specs in both consoles, if I trust some of the other posts I read the XBone is slightly worse, but that's nothing you could notice. Apart from that, Microsoft has the whole cloud computing thing going, and while you might start laughing at me now, this is the future and even Sony knows it.

I think the hardware will prove to be basically the same across both consoles for the crossplatform games. The only things I see being different are the rumour about the cloud server doing a bulk of computing for each system and how much the PS4 makes use of the GDDR5 ram

6. Features:
The XBone is an entertainment device, and it's being marketed as such. Personally, I'd be happy if my device could do more, not mad as many others. I can use Skype, watch TV, play games, record, upload and stream... I'm happy about features. It works just like a small PC (I know, PC master race bla bla), and I think that this is good that way. I would like to see a unified experience over all devices one day.

This comes down to personal opinion (imo). While you find these things appealing and useful, I find them cluttering resource/time wasting points on a checklist. To each their own. I DO however see how these can be useful for people who use them, and for those people who do, this should be pretty awesome for them.

7. Controller:
For some reason I also found some people complaining about the controller. I can't really understand that, for me the XBox controller has always been the best one on the market right now. Wasn't able to hold a PS4 controller so far, but the PS3 ones were none I could really play with.

Again a personal opinion moment. While the 360 controllers are pretty good, My favorite controller is the Xbox Duke (that massive one from Xbox) and the PS2/3 controller. the Duke fit me perfectly, but the PS2/3 controller allows me to curl my hands naturally to get all of the buttons. I say each to their own, and as long as your hands don't get sore right away it should be okay

8. Design:
The simple design (even though it really shouldn't matter) is used so it can fit anywhere in your living room. It's elegant and I like it. Your choice. Although both consoles don't look too different.

Agreed with you here. One looks like a giant eraser, one looks like a VCR and the other... well actually I still don't know what the Wii U console looks like.. but i imagine its also resembles something from when I was in grade 8

9. Games/Exclusives:
This is anyone's game. If you like the PS4's exclusives, go buy that. If you like the XBone's games (of which there are more announced at the moment), go buy that.

This should be the most important thing we (as gamers) are talking about. If you like the games then that will be the console for you. Who cares about gigaflops and terrahurts (being sarcastic here) the games should be the primary goal of people looking to play good games.

10. Price:
I know, I know, money doesn't grow on trees. However, the console price is essentially the same for both. What makes up the other 100 dollars are the extra things in the package, like the Kinect, that you'd have to purchase separately for the PS4. And Gold doesn't count as an argument either, Microsoft and Sony both do the paying for multiplayer now. And so far, Microsoft's servers seem more powerful (waiting for statement on Sony's side), and they've been that way in the past as well.

Price should be discussed closer to launch once all of the "options/bells/whistles" have been revealed.

Now, as you can see, both consoles are not too different. They are both good. They are selling well, and none of them has any big advnatge. The amount of pre-orders is basically the same for both (according to Amazon). This is still early in the "war", so we can only see how it ends once both are out for a while. The XBone will grab a lot of the casuals, while the PS4 currently is mostly bought by "hardcore gamers" as you could say. It's a choice of target group that can go either way. Apart from that, nothing is set in stone yet, we still have a couple of months to go. So, a plea of mine, if you see any of these ridiculous fan circle jerks, don't join them. You can decide what you want to buy, and you can tell anyone why you'd want to buy it, but we don't need another post about how great one console is. It changes nothing if you say Microsoft is doomed a thousand times, look at SimCity - everyone said they're not going to buy it, but it still sold well. The people on forums don't make up the largest amount of buyers.
Both consoles are good. And please don't forget that no company is an angel, they all don't know you and need to make profit, that's how it works. We've seen that often enough in the past.
Okay, this rounds up all the things I wanted to comment on (if I didn't forget anything). I'm open to discuss anything on this topic with you, if you deliver valid arguments.
All in all I think you made some good points, and hopefully my counter points will prolong the discussion. As you said no company is an angel, and none of them are going to truely dominate the market for this cycle. There is heavy favor for the PS4 currently but (again as you said) we still have 3-4 months of news to trickle down and consume to REALLY get a handle on what these consoles are coming with
 

Miss G.

New member
Jun 18, 2013
535
0
0
I don't:
- use Microsoft products other than Hotmail and Word on my Mac.

- feel like shelling out $1100+ for it in my country IF they were selling it there at launch.

- want to be spied on because PRISM is real and that's not people being overly paranoid like some defenders have claimed. (Also, Microsoft retains the right to change the terms and privacy policies at any time without your permission and I doubt you will be going over the EULA with a fine-tooth comb every waking moment to make sure your kinect isn't being used by the NSA. After all Microsoft and their newest purchase, Skype, are onboard with this nonsense).

- want to have to check in with a virtual parole officer for something I've bought as if I was no better than someone who got caught buying stolen property.

- want to pay for expensive(read: unnecessary) peripherals for the same thing my Smart TV and computer can do without a subscription. Especially because you need an HDTV or an upgrade from that to even use the damn thing.

In short, Microsoft should be giving me reasons to buy their luxury product over another's. No one really needs one like they need food/water, shelter/clothing and education so they should be telling me and other potential customers how this superfluous electronic will enhance my free time instead of making it a hassle and a chore where it previously wasn't. As it stands, the only clients they care about are developers/publishers. If you aren't one there is little to no concrete benefit to you, it seems.
 

Kevin Lyons

New member
Jun 17, 2010
55
0
0
What I don't get is why people are so adamant about wanting to play the console offline.

How often do you go to play a game and say to yourself "I don't want to know if my friends are online right now, for longer than 24 hours." If you desperately want to cut yourself off from your friends list, simply turn off your internet connection for the day, then boot it up for a minute while the XBone checks back in.

Then, there's the matter of "How will I play games when my internet is out?" Really think about this for a second. When does your internet connection drop out permanently for extended periods of time? (assuming you don't just have faulty equipment) When the power is out! Now, how do you expect to play your XBone games when the power is out?

And another point regarding the Kinect spying on your living room. It's a pretty paranoid assumption to make that somebody in the government is going to be spying on you through your webcam, and on that note, what do you have to hide? A personal conversation is only personal if you know the people involved, and if the thought of anybody hearing it irks you so much, put a cardboard box over the Kinect and play white noise next to it.

All in all, these "unforgivable deal-breakers" that Microsoft is putting in place for the XBone don't really seem to be all that intrusive or obstructing. These are only problems if you make them problems, and we shouldn't all gang up against Microsoft just for making sure that their product appeals to the people who will be giving them the most money.
 

bullet_sandw1ch

New member
Jun 3, 2011
536
0
0
FargoDog said:
mKeRix said:
1. Used games:
The blockade of selling used games is entirely up to the publisher, so are the fees. What Microsoft has done here is an official way of what already happened before. Remember the Online Passes? That's just like that. Nobody has has to use them. They can. Now, if EA would decide to be a dick and use it - what would happen? They'd do it on every platform. They won't be interested in holding up Sony's image of the messiah console, they want their money. So afaik, it doesn't matter. The possibilities are there on both platforms.
It... really isn't. The entire system is made so you can't trade physical copies of games without giving them to specific 'partnered retailers' who are going to be Gamestop, Game, EB Games, etc, etc. This is not an optional thing. It's the only reason the 24 hour phone home thing exists. Yeah, nobody has to use online passes because Microsoft have built a wonderful, closed garden where publishers can screw over consumers without having to lift a finger.

2. Game sharing:
After Sony's admittedly hilarious video about sharing games (which was also perceived as childish by some, but I think these little slaps are fun in a way) people have been saying that you won't be able to share games on the XBone. Well, yes and no. You can still share games, you can give your game to up to 10 of your friends without even having to hand them your disc, they'll just have it on their account and can easily download and play it right away. The only thing here is, you need to have them on your friends list for at least 30 days and you can only give them them every game once. But honestly, I don't think that's too limiting. I wouldn't hand out my games to people that I just met either. And if you know them for a while and they just made a new account, then 30 days isn't bad either. Apart from that, I've never seen anyone rent a game twice. If you like it after playing it, you usually just buy it.
So what you're saying is, these needless limitations aren't especially limiting because 'they're not too limiting'? Compared to the PS4 and the WiiU, it's still absolutely absurd. It means you can't sell your games unless you trade them into a big retailer, and the whole giving friends your games without handing them over is brought about by this limitation and it's still incredibly imperfect.

3. 24h offline time:
This is a point I can't say much about. I can think of many reasons why they'd do such a thing, but there's nothing I really want to defend here. For me it's no problem at all, I like my games and consoles (and PC) for the online multiplayer, but I see why it would bother people. On the other hand, I'm sure this is nothing they couldn't change. It happened before, so you can hope. If you know you'll be offline for longer than a day, then definitely don't buy the XBone yet though.
You may have a perfectly stable and fine internet connection, but remember Diablo 3 and Sim City? The issue is not the consumer's internet, it's the servers belonging to Microsoft and other publishers. What if there was a Sony-style mass hack? A whole month (or more!) without being able to play your games because of noxious, unnecessary, corporate serving architecture.

4. Evil spying Kinect:
This wrong, just wrong. It has been confirmed that the Kinect can be turned off completely long ago, and you won't be spied. The Kinect itself is also a fairly useful tool, I own a Kinect 1 and there are some fun games for it out there, and it adds functionality by voice commands etc. I know people don't like being forced to get a product, but it's entirely possible that there will be an "Arcade" edition like with the 360, which is cheaper and delivered without Kinect. "Why did Microsoft do this in the first place?" you could ask now. To prevent segmentation. This way everyone has the same setup and games can be designed in that way. Apart from that I believe that if people don't try something new over time, things can't evolve.
Can't be completely turned off. Needs to be plugged in and will still react to certain voice commands. Assuming there will be an arcade edition is, well, an assumption.

5. Hardware:
The hardware isn't too different, really. You have about the same specs in both consoles, if I trust some of the other posts I read the XBone is slightly worse, but that's nothing you could notice. Apart from that, Microsoft has the whole cloud computing thing going, and while you might start laughing at me now, this is the future and even Sony knows it.
PS4 is estimated to be 50 percent more powerful than the Xbox One. [http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-spec-analysis-xbox-one] Consumers won't notice or care, but developers surely will. And this isn't like the PS3 where it was more powerful but came bundled with a whole bunch of programming headaches - both systems have the same architecture, meaning that the only way a multiplat game could be worse on the PS4 is if it is deliberately gimped.

As for cloud computing, ha. Hahahahahaha. Ha. No. Microsoft have yet to show anything intensive running on cloud computing, and so far it appears to be an excuse to bundle always-online into games. And if cloud does blossom into a big thing, Sony have Gaikai. So they'll be able to use cloud and have that 50 percent extra power.

7. Controller:
For some reason I also found some people complaining about the controller. I can't really understand that, for me the XBox controller has always been the best one on the market right now. Wasn't able to hold a PS4 controller so far, but the PS3 ones were none I could really play with.
Controller looks great. Can't wait to use it with my PC. All the reports coming from E3 say the PS4 controller feels considerably better than the PS3 one too. Not hard, but nice to see progress.

8. Design:
The simple design (even though it really shouldn't matter) is used so it can fit anywhere in your living room. It's elegant and I like it. Your choice. Although both consoles don't look too different.
PS4 looks like a PS2. Xbox One looks like a laserdisc player.

9. Games/Exclusives:
This is anyone's game. If you like the PS4's exclusives, go buy that. If you like the XBone's games (of which there are more announced at the moment), go buy that.
I fail to see how this is a point in MS's favour. They will have Xbox exclusives? Yay?

10. Price:
I know, I know, money doesn't grow on trees. However, the console price is essentially the same for both. What makes up the other 100 dollars are the extra things in the package, like the Kinect, that you'd have to purchase separately for the PS4. And Gold doesn't count as an argument either, Microsoft and Sony both do the paying for multiplayer now. And so far, Microsoft's servers seem more powerful (waiting for statement on Sony's side), and they've been that way in the past as well.
The console price is not 'essentially the same'. Not even remotely. You can't say 'Oh it comes with the Kinect so that's why it costs more! Really it costs $399.' What an utterly baffling argument. Is there currently even a hint of the Xbox One coming without the Kinect at any point? Nope, so it costs 100 dollars more to the consumer. You don't just subtract money from a price because something in the box adds to that overall price. You're just reaching at this point.

As for PSPlus vs Xbox Live, PSPlus costs less than gold, has better features than gold. Microsoft have so kindly graced Live subscribers with Halo 3 and AssCreed 2 now, a game that's six years old and a game that's four years old. How kind of them. PS4 also allows watching of any apps like Netflix and Flixster without a PSPlus subscription, unlike the Xbox One.
you. yes, you. i like you and your points a lot. i like your points so much , that i took the 10 seconds of typing i just did to voice that. good job, friend.
 

Adam Locking

New member
Aug 10, 2012
220
0
0
Let me preface by saying I own a 360 currently, but am not going to be an xboner purely due to the 24 hour check in. I can't guarentee I'll be always available for check in, so that's non-negotiable. I'm not sure if I'm going to invest in next gen, but if I am it will be PS4, the main attraction will be a blue-ray player which also plays games. Anyway, on to some of your other points:

mKeRix said:
10. Price:
I know, I know, money doesn't grow on trees. However, the console price is essentially the same for both. What makes up the other 100 dollars are the extra things in the package, like the Kinect, that you'd have to purchase separately for the PS4.
The PS4 is £80 cheaper than the Xbox. Playstation Eye costs £45. It's still cheaper whichever way you slice it.

mKeRix said:
4. Evil spying Kinect:
This wrong, just wrong. It has been confirmed that the Kinect can be turned off completely long ago, and you won't be spied. The Kinect itself is also a fairly useful tool, I own a Kinect 1 and there are some fun games for it out there, and it adds functionality by voice commands etc. I know people don't like being forced to get a product, but it's entirely possible that there will be an "Arcade" edition like with the 360, which is cheaper and delivered without Kinect. "Why did Microsoft do this in the first place?" you could ask now. To prevent segmentation. This way everyone has the same setup and games can be designed in that way. Apart from that I believe that if people don't try something new over time, things can't evolve.
Fine, I understand why the console ships with the Kinect, but why does it have to be plugged in for the console to function? If you can turn it off, why have it plugged in at all?

The fear isn't just that Microsoft is watching; it's that hackers can very easily gain control of it and watch you. Think about it, all the app support for the console are handled by a modified Windows 8 OS. Windows, you know, the least secure OS out there? How long till someone makes a virus that can turn on the camera remotely and record you? Weeks?
 

Miss G.

New member
Jun 18, 2013
535
0
0
Kevin Lyons said:
What I don't get is why people are so adamant about wanting to play the console offline.

How often do you go to play a game and say to yourself "I don't want to know if my friends are online right now, for longer than 24 hours." If you desperately want to cut yourself off from your friends list, simply turn off your internet connection for the day, then boot it up for a minute while the XBone checks back in.

Then, there's the matter of "How will I play games when my internet is out?" Really think about this for a second. When does your internet connection drop out permanently for extended periods of time? (assuming you don't just have faulty equipment) When the power is out! Now, how do you expect to play your XBone games when the power is out?

And another point regarding the Kinect spying on your living room. It's a pretty paranoid assumption to make that somebody in the government is going to be spying on you through your webcam, and on that note, what do you have to hide? A personal conversation is only personal if you know the people involved, and if the thought of anybody hearing it irks you so much, put a cardboard box over the Kinect and play white noise next to it.

All in all, these "unforgivable deal-breakers" that Microsoft is putting in place for the XBone don't really seem to be all that intrusive or obstructing. These are only problems if you make them problems, and we shouldn't all gang up against Microsoft just for making sure that their product appeals to the people who will be giving them the most money.
1. I avoid multiplayer like the plague and having no option to go without it for the whole console, not just a game, is like throwing away money for something I will never use.

2. How much faith are you gonna put in their servers that SimCity and other such things wont be a hassle? Yes, the power goes out sometimes, but more people have electricity than people have the required internet connection for this system to work on.

3. So, essentially you're saying, "if they straight-up had an employee there, watching/listening/taking notes you'd be just as cool with it" Or did you miss the part where Microsoft is part of the PRISM/NSA scandal. It doesn't matter whether you did something or not, whether you have info the government wants or not; you and others like you come off as people saying they don't mind buying a warrant instead of the police knocking on your door to give it to you without reasonable-cause-for-suspicion even being in effect. And if this becomes standard because of you people voting with your wallets, then thanks for causing another gaming crash.

4. Prisoners complain about privacy as well, but more than likely they did something to be put in that position in the first place. What have we done to merits these check-ins and console-shaped ankle bracelets?

I want any defender to reasonably answer these without sounding like a battered spouse or a stalker victim saying 'it not so bad' when it shouldn't be happening to begin with.
 

Zeckt

New member
Nov 10, 2010
1,085
0
0
Yet another poster who refuses to even acknowledge microsoft's high 360 failure rate and why we should suddenly trust them that the xbone will be any different in requiring MUCH more money having to rebuy the console. Of course like everyone of these types of topics defending microsoft you will simply ignore that point.

Why would I trust microsoft when they gave me no reason to? you think I can just look the other way after 3 console and 4 wireless controller failures? Why don't you bring customer faith in your original topic? are you too scared to, or do you refuse to simply acknowledge it and pray that the xbone won't kick your bank account in the ass later down the line having to rebuy it?

Somebody? anyone? PLEASE tell me why you still trust microsoft?! Why don't you EVER acknowledge the last gen hardware failures and how customers lost out in hundreds of dollars?!
 

Canadamus Prime

Robot in Disguise
Jun 17, 2009
14,334
0
0
1. Not quite since what Microsoft has done is make it much easier for companies to pull such dick moves by providing the tools for them to do so. That's like putting a bunch of guns in front of a serial killer and stepping back saying "It's his choice to use them."

2. Don't really care about that.

3. Yeah nobody wants to have to check in with Microsoft every 24hrs like some kind of paroled criminal. We may be online all the time, but we're not online with Microsoft all the time and I certainly don't want to be and I certainly don't want to have to check in with them once a day.

4. Not my biggest concern. Although I sure hope it can be turned off. Not that I'm buying the damn thing anyway.

5. Never heard any complaints about this.

6. Since you're trying to defend the Xbone as a console, this kinda undermines your whole argument.

7. Haven't heard any complaints about this either. Other than the fact it won't use 360 controllers which I don't understand, the new controller doesn't really look any different than the 360 controller so why couldn't they make it compatible?

8. Don't see why this is a big issue myself.

9. Whatever

10. Since the extra hundred dollars is to pay for features nobody asked for I don't see how it's justified, but if you feel it's worth the money (and the sore ass) then be my guest.
 

Miss G.

New member
Jun 18, 2013
535
0
0
Zeckt said:
Yet another poster who refuses to even acknowledge microsoft's high 360 failure rate and why we should suddenly trust them that the xbone will be any different in requiring MUCH more money having to rebuy the console. Of course like everyone of these types of topics defending microsoft you will simply ignore that point.

Why would I trust microsoft when they gave me no reason to? you think I can just look the other way after 3 console and 4 wireless controller failures? Why don't you bring customer faith in your original topic? are you too scared to, or do you refuse to simply acknowledge it and pray that the xbone won't kick your bank account in the ass later down the line having to rebuy it?

Somebody? anyone? PLEASE tell me why you still trust microsoft?! Why don't you EVER acknowledge the last gen hardware failures and how customers lost out in hundreds of dollars?!
I never had one of their systems before but have heard about and seen videos of people smashing their RRoD 360s. I didn't even think to list that the PS3 and Wii had extremely low failure rates in comparison to the 360 and other electronics in general. I, too, would like to see them try to put a positive spin on re-buying the same thing multiple times. History repeats itself a lot; the xbone might turn out to fail the same way, 'cept it'll be way more costly. Buying more $500 bricks doesn't seem smart unless they were made of platinum or precious stones and you were in the process of building an expensive wall or something just to be expensive.
 

GladChimer

New member
Jun 17, 2013
2
0
0
You said both consoles are on par technically. Let me add that both of them share most of the games since most of the games shown at E3 are multi-plattform releases.
Let's forget DRM for a second. You get the PS3 for a hundred dollars cheaper, and I would like to argue your point about the Xbox having more features for the money.
You aren't exactly wrong because, like you said, the Kinect is included, but I don't want a Kinect and it doesn't seem like most of us do. The Playstation subscription is much cheaper averaging at about 5 dollars per month, as well. Maybe if there was a different bundle that would let me get the Xbox One for $400 without the Kinect, I would give it more of a chance.

I agree with you that both consoles should be respected in some way, but for me it is a very simple decision already. I want the cheaper of the two if I don't lose anything by getting that particular system, and I would prefer less online-features than a system that focuses on online-features because I mostly play games offline. I also want a clean experience that lets me focus on playing video games, not on what new movie came out; I don't want to know about IGN's new strategy for winning matches in Battlefield 3, either. I never liked the Xbox 360's interface because of the ads and I never wanted to pay for Live, which is why my Xbox 360, though the first console that I bought, has been left in the dust (quite literally, it might not even work anymore because of the dust because I haven't turned it on for two years).

But, again, I agree with you. Respect the Xbox One for what it is and buy it if you think it suits your playstyle and your game-taste. Its not a horrible console, its just... Very different... And it doesn't fit me.
 

Druidbox

New member
Aug 2, 2010
1
0
0
http://www.ibtimes.com/ps4-pre-orders-outnumber-xbox-2-1-gamestop-according-report-1309961

Not only will they bomb, they are already bombing. And keep in mind, the Xbox One has been available for pre-order -longer- than the PS4. These numbers could get even more slanted in Sony's favor. The linked article is dated for the 17th. Another article, looking at the time period between the 10th and 12th, saw pre-orders coming in at a 3 to 2 ratio in Sony's favor. Bear in mind that the PS4 didn't even have it's press event until the 10th, and caught up that quick.

There is an old saying, "The customer is always right". Well, customers vote with their wallets, and from the look of things, customers are saying no, these things are not ok. Your personal views (which you are completely entitled to, btw) are just that, personal. Fact is, the Xbox One -does- have pre-orders, which means that are people who are ok with this. But the larger group just plain isn't. No amount of explaining will change it.

I mean, look at it this way. You've got two deli's, side by side. You go into the first, which we'll call Deli One, and they have a whole lot more ingredients. And they sit you down and say, "Ok, you can eat here, but you've gotta call us at least an hour in advance, or we won't serve you. Also, one out of every thirty sandwiches will have dog poop instead of mustard on it. But you get all these extra options, which all deli's will eventually have, and that's the future. Also, you can share your sandwich with a friend. But, you can't cut it in half and both eat, only one of you can eat at a time. And you need our express permission before you can do so." Also, that deli is more expensive.

Then, you go into the other deli, which skips two numbers and is Deli 4. They offer a cheaper sandwich, and there will never be any dog poop. You and your friend still can't eat at the same time, but you don't have any other barriers to sharing. And you can just come in and sit down. Yeah, they might night have as many ingredients, but it's still a damn tasty sandwich.

I dunno about you, but I'ma eat at Deli 4. And now I'm hungry.
 

Ayay

New member
Dec 6, 2009
121
0
0
Why would people trust a company that looks at its sale figures and say ..People bought way to few kinect , hey i know lets bundle it in, If the want a box they need to take kinect ,,works for other companies like cable. And the whole sharing thing, yea if you got the max limit thats 10 friends sharing one game , hope you like sitting down to play and getting a :Sorry the game you want is taken please pick another.But hey the got a few months to spin this mess, they might make it .
 

Mert Matthews

New member
Feb 12, 2012
20
0
0
You know i saw this topic and i thought "Look MS publicity workers trying to control the damage, how cute" At the first few pages why are the people who were defending xbone were people with very old accounts and only a few posts (Granted i don't post much and not really active but if you wanna argue on it, thats just argumentatum ad hominem) Main argument i see from supporters is the share system and i would like to ask you 1 thing, Why would MS implement so many DRMs and enable us to share games for free with 10 people, that would reduce the sales of the games directly by %90 (1 account buys 10 play) This is simply illogical with all that DRM so i think they knew that this was going to happen, they tried to mitigate the PR damage with this feature (Ever wonder why did MS representative wanted more questions about this family sharing instead?)Also the console still has not been released but the logic the company is going with seems to be the problem, As i always say, it doesn't matter if you have the best programmers in the universe, when your design sucks no lack of bugs is gonna help it.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
This thread still sort of makes me cringe. the original post doesn't actually address why the Bone is a good system, merely why it's not the spawn of Satan, Hitler, Bin Laden and Pinkie Pie.

I will certainly concede it's not the worst thing ever, but "Online checkins aren't so bad" isn't a persuasive argument for good.

And that's the thing. Unless you REALLY want Dead Rising: Modern Warfare 4 or Sunset whatever, I don't see any reason to specifically pick the Bone. It's their job to make me want it, to give me positive reasons to buy it, and they're failing. In fact, at this point, they're kind of saying "it's not so bad."

Miss G. said:
I never had one of their systems before but have heard about and seen videos of people smashing their RRoD 360s. I didn't even think to list that the PS3 and Wii had extremely low failure rates in comparison to the 360 and other electronics in general.
Actually, the Wii and Ps3 still had high failure rates compared to other electronics.

If we take the most favourable numbers for the most reliable console, we still have the Wii with almost triple what would be considered a good defect rate.

That being said, it's unlikely we'll see another Xbox fiasco like the RROD this gen because Microsoft isn't rushing to beat the competition. That was the primary issue that led to the RROD in the first place.

Ayay said:
Why would people trust a company that looks at its sale figures and say ..People bought way to few kinect , hey i know lets bundle it in, If the want a box they need to take kinect
I don't know what you're talking about. The Kinect was a record-selling electronic device. There's no reason to persue this line of thinking.

Mert Matthews said:
Why would MS implement so many DRMs and enable us to share games for free with 10 people, that would reduce the sales of the games directly by %90 (1 account buys 10 play) This is simply illogical with all that DRM so i think they knew that this was going to happen, they tried to mitigate the PR damage with this feature
Let me offer a competing hypothesis: Microsoft banked on the other major console manufacturer they compete with doing roughly the same thing (a safe assumption) and attempted to look like the friendlier competitor. It simply backfired ebcause they gambled on the wrong thing.

(Ever wonder why did MS representative wanted more questions about this family sharing instead?)
Herman Cain asked us to consider all the women he didn't harass. George Bush asked us to consider all the civilians we hadn't killed. When you're scraping the bottom of the barrel, you will look for anything. And "we're not completely dicking you over, just mostly" sounds about right.

Ultimately, Microsoft failed to understand their audience either way.
 

KarmaTheAlligator

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,472
0
0
Mert Matthews said:
Why would MS implement so many DRMs and enable us to share games for free with 10 people, that would reduce the sales of the games directly by %90 (1 account buys 10 play) This is simply illogical with all that DRM so i think they knew that this was going to happen, they tried to mitigate the PR damage with this feature (Ever wonder why did MS representative wanted more questions about this family sharing instead?)
I was actually wondering the same thing. There's just no way MS will let 10 people get unlimited access to a game from a single purchase, especially when you consider how it works for physical copies: one person gets to play the game, but since there's only one disc, the moment they return it, they can't play anymore. It makes no sense that any game company would agree to screw themselves over in this fashion, which means there are some thing they haven't told us, like a time limit or it's a one time only thing.
 

Dryk

New member
Dec 4, 2011
981
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
I don't know what you're talking about. The Kinect was a record-selling electronic device. There's no reason to persue this line of thinking.
How many of those Kinects were actually plugged into an Xbox and how many were used by engineers and computer scientists because they were a cheap 3D camera?
 

Karadalis

New member
Apr 26, 2011
1,065
0
0
The mere fact that the xbox one needs a lengthy OP defending it makes the argument that it is a good console null and void. I dont see any threads about the PS4 or the Wii U trying to defend them and/or explain why RESTRICTIONS are a good thing in the same way because you know... they dont need em, they dont have em (restrictions).

If you need to explain to someone why a console is good despite the obvious downsides then you allready failed.. those things speak for themselves and oh boy.. microsoft spoke for itselfe.

And really.. how can anyone ever consider RESTRICTIONS as something positive?

Restrictions by their very definition are negative and NEVER will be positive when it comes to features of consumer goods.