Daystar Clarion said:
I wasn't criticising you
Ninty advertised the consoles would have X amount of memory, but it turns out they don't have separate drives for the OS, so if you get an 8GB console, it's more like a 6GB console.
So, why don't we have a bunch of people rage at Apple for exactly the same thing regarding iPods and iPhones (I assume iPads as well, but no personal experience to verify). The 8GB iPod leaves you with ~6GB of storage for actual data after accounting for iOS, for example.
Kekkonen1 said:
Actually, according to Nintendo's own explanations the 8Gb model gives you 3Gb to work with and the 32Gb model gives you 25Gb... The best bet is probably buying the 8Gb model and then use the extra 50USD that the premium model would have cost and buy a 500Gb external harddrive. Yeah, Nintendo likes putting those kinds of costs on the consumer.
I disagree, assuming you don't hate Nintendoland. The premium model is 32GB and includes a charging cradle for the game pad (as opposed to just a cable) and Nintendoland as a pack in title for $50 more than the basic model. Nintendoland retails for $60. So you pay -$10 for 24GB of storage and a cradle. That's...certainly not bad.
Kekkonen1 said:
The thing is, I could have accepted that one model of the Wii U, similarily to the Xbox 360 Arcade, only had 8 (3)Gb data, but that the so called PREMIUM model only have 32 (25)Gb, which is still so little that you will be getting an external hard-drive, that is just bonkers.
Yeah, I suspect everyone will end up with a drive hooked to their Wii. I've got a spare 1TB drive that runs off USB power I'll hook to mine. The external I actually use on my PC is a StarTech InfoSafe in RAID 5 containing 4x WD30EFRX drives.
Kekkonen1 said:
But then on the other hand, since purchases are apparently not transfarable between Wii U's, which means you seemingly lose your purchases if the Wii U is stolen/broken/bricked during update etc it might be best to stick with physical copies anyway.
I assume they'll do like they did with the Wii and transfer the data between Wii Us/accounts when you send one in for service. Which covers everything but "stolen." I'm surprised with the whole Nintendo Network thing that they don't simply tie your purchases to your NN ID.
Beautiful End said:
To everyone saying stuff like "DURR CAPTAIN OBVIOUS DONT TURN IT OFF DURRRRR!!1!11!", just chill and read it again.
Yeah, shutting down your system while its updating, or even saving a file, is dumb. Not just a system but any other electronic device. But if the WiiU has indeed an auto turn off feature that kicks in after an hour, then it's not the customer's fault.
That feature is disabled during the update procedure. It's also disabled during Wii to Wii U data transfer.
Beautiful End said:
Clearly, or you'd know what I said above. Patched mine and did the Wii transfer (both hour+ procedures) without touching it in any fashion while it was going on. This is literally someone going "It said to not shut the console down while this is happening, so I'm going to shut the console down while this is happening." I feel for anyone who has a power outage mid-update though, but I'm pretty sure that'll be covered by warranty.
Beautiful End said:
so I can't claim there's a way to turn off said feature.
You can, it's in the system settings menu. You can also change how long it will sit idle before powering down.
Beautiful End said:
People don't know much about it yet. And honestly, if I would have got one, I would have got the update ASAP before doing anything else just to have my console up and running. And I probably wouldn't have noticed that auto feature. And I probably would have left the console alone while it updated the 5 freakin' GB required for the update!
And it probably would have been bricked because I wouldn't know my stupid WiiU can commit suicide.
That's more or less what I did. What's shocking is that every goddamned game had a lengthy patch on release day. Or at least Nintendoland, Assassins Creed III, and New Super MarioBros. U all did.
What really would have happened instead of your console committing suicide is that it would have all worked just fine (though taking it's sweet time), barring you manually shutting down the console, unplugging it, or having a power outage during the time that it warns you specifically not to shut off the console.
Beautiful End said:
Yeah, Nintendo would probably replace the console but there shouldn't be any need. When my TV died for no reason alone, I was pissed but I sent it back to the factory to get it fixed because it was juts bad luck. An isolated case. But when something like this happens...I don't know what to say.
Way to go, Nintendo. Way to set up the example for the next gen. What, jealous much of the PS3 or what?
You'll note that the spate of people who actually have bricked consoles in the comments on the linked article all have something in common -- either they had a power outage or someone unplugged it. No one has claimed that their console self-bricked due to the auto-power off feature.