You want me to address you fully? Fine.
daflame said:
I know Prime III wasn't as good but the truth was that Nintendo forced them to release it early. In fact, they did that to most of their franchises on the Wii
Really? Not that good? I have seen a lot of praise for Prime 3, I think 2 was the weakest in the trilogy to most (based from reactions I have seen) It really didn't feel rushed at all.
namely Brawl (code was found for characters from melee that were omitted along with other characters that never made it)
Lots of games have unused code, because in the development process there are things that get scrapped. Don't assume it was rushed just because there was unused code, that would mean almost every game is rushed.
If Nintendo would rush those games to release knowing they could cash in on their name, why would they hire Team Ninja who just makes anime-based stuff? So they can cater to their home country. Why would they throw in anime-themed melodrama (look at the trailers)and make Samus look like a androgynous teenager? Personally I can't stand to look at that, its hideous and repulsive. Did anyone look how the combat works? You can't move in first person view!
Why not hire team ninja? so far it looks to be a good job. You clearly don't like anime that much. I get that it's not for everyone but you seem pretty, well, stupid to complain that they are not catering to
you oh yeah the game is 2D I would assume the combat would work like the old 2D games, The 3D looks optional.
Nintendo doesn't care for the Metroid series anymore. If they did, they would've let Retro flesh out Prime 3 and let them keep the rights to the series. Aside from that, anyone remember Metroid Dread, the real 2d sequel to the series? It was hinted in Prime 1. What happened to it? Nintendo is cashing in on its own franchises by doing remakes (as we saw from remaking pokemon games, brawl being just a few modes and characters better than melee, and a mario galaxy TWO) because they are afraid of going ahead in the story because it would mean more resources and furthering the plot to something solid. Heck, one can argue the Wii is a remake of the gamecube just marketed and hyped very well. I bought into it and stood by it for years but now its time i just stick with what doesn't fail, old games and PC.
And your argument goes completely downhill here. With the trilogy done, why wouldn't they move on to something new? You are complaining about them constantly remaking things so when they move on to something else you still complain. And Nintendo isn't the only company guilty of remaking things. Also Galaxy TWO! oh my god, remember Gears of War TWO, Resident evil TWO, Halo TWO, Star Ocean TWO, Final Fantasy TWO, Bioshock TWO. Lots of games make sequels, why are you bitching about Nintendo doing the same with Mario?
Also while the Wii shares some hardware with the gamecube there is a lot of new hardware making it superior to it. If I didn't know any better I would say some of the GCN hardware is there for better backwards compatibility (I think Sony did that with the PS2 and 3)