The birds are singing, the sky is blue, CD Projekt RED (and it's parent company GOG) continues to be incredibly awesome and Capcom continues to sell on-disc content, cheats and costumes.
Yeah the first one is a bit of a trudge to get through, but I found the story kept me going. The second one improves pretty much everything. The combat feels weightier, the environments are beautiful, and the characters are varied. Oh yes, later on when you come to a mission to give this guy harpy feathers, be sure to finish it, you will not regret it.Tinybear said:I personally did not like The Witcher very much, but I still bought the second one while it was on sale just because these guys are so damn nice. They're also the guys behind GOG.com![]()
Read the article closer, the guy actually DOES say there is a place for DLCviranimus said:Snip
In other words yes, paid DLC has it's place, but paid DLC should ONLY happen if the content is actually big and important enough, otherwise it should be free. No $10 costume packs for this developer, but maybe $10 to get a bunch of sidequests.It should be noted that Tomaszkiewicz doesn't completely rule out the possibility of paid content for The Witcher 3, but stresses that "If we ever decide to charge you for something, we think you will appreciate what you get in return."
Sorry to correct you Steven, but that's "it would have to be something absolutely massive.Steven Bogos said:Considering that The Witcher 2 received over 10 gigs of free content, it would have to be someone absolutely massive to justify being charged for it!
sorry, but that made no sense to memad825 said:-snip-
The DLCs are glorified patches.
Oh I know, I did read it. My post was more to the focus of what CD projekt has done in the past and where it seems like their individual philosophy lies and how they could have benefitted if they were a tad more proactive about the possibility from both increased exposure, and secondary sales from easier to produce content.immortalfrieza said:Read the article closer, the guy actually DOES say there is a place for DLCviranimus said:Snip
The Bandit hideout [http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Bandit_hideout] in the Flotsam forest? In other words, they deliberately withheld content; the Troll Trouble quest.Mr Ink 5000 said:sorry, but that made no sense to memad825 said:-snip-
The DLCs are glorified patches.
That's a rather large exaggeration... I mean, I appreciate their business practices as much as anyone, but the way this make it sound, it seems like they released an entire game worth of game data separate from the game itself, and added new content several times what the core game had (ie: Witcher 2 even with the Enhanced Edition has just under a hundred quests.)Steven Bogos said:The Witcher 2 received over 10 gigs of free content, it would have to be someone absolutely massive to justify being charged for it!
Both The Witcher and The Witcher 2 received a very extensive amount of free post-launch support, receiving "Enhanced Editions," which added hours of gampeplay and hundreds of new quests and animations, released as free updates for existing customers.
Hold on, they didn't charge anyone for it though? It was non-essential bonus content that was released for free.mad825 said:The Bandit hideout [http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Bandit_hideout] in the Flotsam forest? In other words, they deliberately withheld content; the Troll Trouble quest.Mr Ink 5000 said:sorry, but that made no sense to memad825 said:-snip-
The DLCs are glorified patches.
Edit: But I'm sure they did design the set pieces, characters, and level design around the DLC...I only wish.
How do you know I wasn't talking about them adding GIANTS as DLC characters?immortalfrieza said:Read the article closer, the guy actually DOES say there is a place for DLCviranimus said:Snip
Only something really big, and something that will not make you feel ripped off, justifies a price tag."
In other words yes, paid DLC has it's place, but paid DLC should ONLY happen if the content is actually big and important enough, otherwise it should be free. No $10 costume packs for this developer, but maybe $10 to get a bunch of sidequests.It should be noted that Tomaszkiewicz doesn't completely rule out the possibility of paid content for The Witcher 3, but stresses that "If we ever decide to charge you for something, we think you will appreciate what you get in return."
Sorry to correct you Steven, but that's "it would have to be something absolutely massive.Steven Bogos said:Considering that The Witcher 2 received over 10 gigs of free content, it would have to be someone absolutely massive to justify being charged for it!
The "Troll Trouble" DLC was free of charge. Tomaszkiewicz is talking about selling content to gamers. I honestly can't even understand how you would think this is a valid argument.mad825 said:The Bandit hideout [http://witcher.wikia.com/wiki/Bandit_hideout] in the Flotsam forest? In other words, they deliberately withheld content; the Troll Trouble quest.Mr Ink 5000 said:sorry, but that made no sense to memad825 said:-snip-
The DLCs are glorified patches.
Edit: But I'm sure they did design the set pieces, characters, and level design around the DLC...I only wish.