Yeah, she's hot. I will even give that it would be appropriate to ask specifically to not dress provocatively. But this is ridiculous. I'm thinking that a lot of people didn't actually read the article. People, shes not wearing a bikini to work, then complaining when she gets unwanted attention. She is wearing business suits. Shes wearing cloths more conservative then her counterparts. Hell, she was told that she was required to straighten her hair to decrease her sexual appeal. If curly hair spells the difference between being okay, and rendering your male counterparts incapable of doing there job, then they have serious fetish or sexual issues that they need to discuss with a therapist. And it's not a matter of workplace performance: Shes getting awards and praise for her work left and right. Yes, there are bigger injustices out there. She got a few jobs more easily. And comparatively, one instance of being tricked into looking at a penis, growing up as a poor immigrant, and being forced into unemployment thanks to being fired for being attractive isn't the worst hard luck story in the world. But it still sucks, and she is absolutely right to sue. The silliness of this issue is clearly the banks fault.