Cyber warfare, like in one of the Splinter Cell games? I see that as more likely than total war. Attack a country's economy, communications, etc., and eventually their ability to function as a country, let alone fight, will be destroyed.kanada514 post=18.72751.772146 said:The third world war will be caused by economy, and will be an economical war mainly along with regional conflicts, in the middle east notably.
Well, I expect an economical war. Economical sanctions, deals getting cut-off, recession, possible depression, propaganda, and re-centralisation of economy.
I see it more likely as the other type of war which directly kills massively.
In the future, war will be fought in counter-strike.Beowulf DW post=18.72751.772243 said:Cyber warfare, like in one of the Splinter Cell games? I see that as more likely than total war. Attack a country's economy, communications, etc., and eventually their ability to function as a country, let alone fight, will be destroyed.kanada514 post=18.72751.772146 said:The third world war will be caused by economy, and will be an economical war mainly along with regional conflicts, in the middle east notably.
Well, I expect an economical war. Economical sanctions, deals getting cut-off, recession, possible depression, propaganda, and re-centralisation of economy.
I see it more likely as the other type of war which directly kills massively.
I also agree with the idea of a few regional conflicts, but only where cyber warfare is not viable (i.e. the Middle East).
What he said. I don't think it matters how it starts or who it's between, in the end we'd all probably lose i.e. nuclear winter or worse.Saskwach post=18.72751.771874 said:"I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones." Albert Einstein
Maybe all sides will agree that nuclear weapons should be off-limits, but that's a mighty iffy maybe.
Actually they're already deploying remote controlled robots in the battlefield, and they're supposed to be a lot like an FPSElephantGuts post=18.72751.772266 said:^^^ That'd be pretty sick, if wars were fought in videogames? Who's the best soldier now, huh? Me. Who needs muscles to join the army?
Africa could play a decent role in WW3, It would be a potential landing zone for U.S Occupants, Controlling the Mediterranean so that supply to the middle east slows to a trickle.UsefulPlayer 1 post=18.72751.772310 said:I'm going to go with Eastern Civilization against Western Civilization, its a wonder that we all came from the same planet.
Not sure how Africa fits into this though...
They'd probably be exploited.Bulletinmybrain post=18.72751.772347 said:Africa could play a decent role in WW3, It would be a potential landing zone for U.S Occupants, Controlling the Mediterranean so that supply to the middle east slows to a trickle.UsefulPlayer 1 post=18.72751.772310 said:I'm going to go with Eastern Civilization against Western Civilization, its a wonder that we all came from the same planet.
Not sure how Africa fits into this though...
(That is if its a war in the middle east for oil.)