the house on mango street, it is just so completely god awful, puts me in a bad mood everytime i think about it
I wouldn't say it's the worst for me, but I definitely don't think I'll be reading it again anytime soon.Midgeamoo said:Lord of the Flies.
Oh gawd, no wonder people my age are turned off literature when they had to read THAT in their last year of secondary school. Also I can't believe I used to like Anthony Horowitz' 'Alex Ryder' series when I younger. (Stormbreaker, Point blanc etc.)
I kinda like the Eragon series, it's not written perfectly but the world/story are really quite impressive.
I agreed with a lot of what you said, so I'll respond to you with some conversation.JoeThree said:I want to say Twilight and Left Behind, but they were both so terrible they were entertaining. I'll admit it, I absolutely lost it when I got to the "vampire Baseball" chapter.
I think the absolute worst book series I've ever read and really could get ZERO enjoyment from was Sword of Truth. The characters are Mary/Gary Stus at best, and can never do wrong, yet their actions and decisions are often contradictory to previous statements or decisions the characters have made. The author is a pretentious, smug douche (look up a picture of Terry Goodkind real quick on Google image search if you think I'm joking, that should be enough), and everything is so contrived it's practically painful. In fact, I would go so far as to say that it's the literary equivilant of Manos - something so bad, it surpasses "so bad it's good" territory and falls BACK into normal bad... only worse.
Wheel of Time and Harry Potter are fine series', and I think people are hating on them here mostly because they're so damn popular. When it comes to WoT, around book 8 Robert Jordan really started mucking things up, and while it appeared he was started to get things back on track, we'll never know for certain if he would have been able to mend the series. However, the two most recent books, penned by Brandon Sanderson after Jordan passed away, have been really enjoyable and a lot more in spirit with the beginning of the series. I can't say I don't understand people not enjoying the series, but to say it's the worst is a bit much. The same kinda goes for Potter - it started out really fun, and turned sour. The last 3 books (at least to me) turned a whimsical, fun series into something bland and boring.
I also really hated To Kill a Mockingbird in high school. I'm not going to go too deep into it, but the style was so boring I would have rather watched the ink on the pages dry than read the actual words they formed... and it would have probably been a less tedious process to boot. What sucks is that the message itself is fine, but the style is so damn drab it's like trying to wade through quicksand, and before anyone plays the "well you're just too dumb to appreciate big/classic books" card, I've read plenty of other classic novels and enjoyed the hell out of them. Moby Dick remains, to this day, one of my favorite peices of literature.
It's not actually bad, I read it for Literature class last term.. My only issue was that Frome's wife could have been less of a whiny *****.Echer123 said:I have to read that over the summer for AP English, what's so bad about it?4173 said:Ethan Frome
It took me 0.5 seconds to come up with that answer, I'm so certain.
They don't. I read the new one and....meh. Every now and than Colfer spends 3 pages explaining shit no one wants to hear, the plot is bad (and confusing), some of the characters that luckily get killed of at the end made me want to kill myself, and the ending is just UTTER AND COMPLETE SHIT.soulblade06 said:For a young adult series, I really liked the Artemis Fowl books. In my opinion, the series should have ended with The Lost Tribe (sure, it had little to do with the rest of the series, but it sticks out in my memory a whole lot more than any of the other ones and, in my opinion, did a nice job of wrapping up the series even if the book before it did the same thing).
Then Eoin Colfer wrote The Time Paradox. What a horrible book.
Not only does it end on the third biggest cliffhanger of all time (the all-powerful villain that moments earlier was ready to take over the world vanishes without a trace), but it's endlessly confusing.
The mom's sick and it turns out that she has a magic disease that can only be cured with the brain fluid of a species of lemur that would be extinct except for the one that Artemis's mom bought for the heck of it (because that's just what rich people do). Whoops, Artemis sold the lemur in question. A long time ago. As in before the first book. Luckily for them, they happen to know an imp that can send them back in time. Then there's some nonsense about Holly suddenly greiving over the mom she lost even before the first book but never thought about until now and an organization dedicated to eradicating all "useless" species on the planet, which is just a front for Opal to gain the MacGuffin lemur's brain fluid to give herself UNLIMITED COSMIC POWER!!!!
They get the lemur, come back to the future, but guess what: Opal already has UNLIMITED COSMIC POWER!!!! Big showdown happens, some people get locked in barrels of life-sucking goo and others kill themselves trying to save Artemis (or nearly, anyway. It is a young-adult book after all). Then Artemis runs to the solar plane he'd prepared earlier and leads Opal into a trap based on a Checkov's Leviathan mentioned earlier in the story.
I know that's a lot of spoilers, but trust me: you don't want to read it. I think another book got written, but I really don't want to bother reading it just to see how they resolve this mess.
People here don't seem to have read the series, just Eragon. The guy was a new writer at the time and Eragon wasn't really all that great. Eldest got better and Brisingr was pretty damn good.Frieswiththat said:I wouldn't say it's the worst for me, but I definitely don't think I'll be reading it again anytime soon.Midgeamoo said:Lord of the Flies.
Oh gawd, no wonder people my age are turned off literature when they had to read THAT in their last year of secondary school. Also I can't believe I used to like Anthony Horowitz' 'Alex Ryder' series when I younger. (Stormbreaker, Point blanc etc.)
I kinda like the Eragon series, it's not written perfectly but the world/story are really quite impressive.
(Emphasis my own).cefm said:The Brothers Karamazov stands out to me as singularly terrible. Bad writing, bad story, bad characters, bad translation, LONG, and has the distinction of being by a world-famous and celebrated author, and everyone's heard of it. Well it's terrible. Un-readable. Fit for keeping the fireplace lit and that's about it.
Oops! I was just referring to Lord of the Flies. I didn't actually see the rest of the post before I wrote it :/. Whoops!Midgeamoo said:People here don't seem to have read the series, just Eragon. The guy was a new writer at the time and Eragon wasn't really all that great. Eldest got better and Brisingr was pretty damn good.Frieswiththat said:I wouldn't say it's the worst for me, but I definitely don't think I'll be reading it again anytime soon.Midgeamoo said:Lord of the Flies.
Oh gawd, no wonder people my age are turned off literature when they had to read THAT in their last year of secondary school. Also I can't believe I used to like Anthony Horowitz' 'Alex Ryder' series when I younger. (Stormbreaker, Point blanc etc.)
I kinda like the Eragon series, it's not written perfectly but the world/story are really quite impressive.