Hmm, while his point does carry through he meant it from the other side.sunburst313 said:He said we should focus on accents that are a result of English being the first language. That means we shouldn't ridicule non-native accents. It may have been unnecessary but the double negative expressed exactly what he meant. You do not get a Gold Star in English class today.kurupt87 said:Double negative completely defeated your point there good chap.
"aren't a result of English not being their mother tongue" = are a result of English being their mother tongue.
In other words, saying that "we should exclude people who do not speak English as a first language" and that "we should only include people who speak English as their first language"; the outcome of these two statements are essentially the same but they differ in tone and highlight different groups of people.
The way the post was written suggested to me that the first statement was what the writer was aiming for, not the second.
Edit: I'm wrong