Not entirely true actually. The Founders are basically paranoid xenophobes that fear all other "lesser" races and feel the only way to be safe is to effectively conquer and control them. The only races they trust are ones they themselves genetically engineered to serve them. It was made pretty clear that The Dominion would have invaded no matter what happened. It's also an issue where they have basically enslaved all of the races serving them and keep them in line under the jackboot of their military to prevent them from ever being a threat. The Dominion plays the entire diplomatic game to build up forces and tries to behave reasonably, but it's actually not. Heck, they had a few scenes where Gul Ducat was sitting around getting his evil on about what a facist jerkwad he was, only to have Jeffery Combs' Vorta character quietly outdo him... whose the bigger psychopath? Does it matter? The Vorta said half a dozen times they pretty much were going to take the entire Alpha Quadrant, it was only a question of whether you joined them willingly and got treated better, or got stomped into the mud. Their whole strategy was to maintain an uneasy peace, infiltrate, play the factions against each other, and then send in a huge military force.Katatori-kun said:Seems my prior post got eaten.Crono1973 said:The best DS9 episodes were about the Dominion War.Katatori-kun said:You're kidding!Crono1973 said:Most of the Ferengi episodes suck but atleast they were better than TNG's Ferengi episodes like The Last Outpost.CPunchMaster said:There's a couple episodes of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine that come to mind. The one where Dax falls in love with a guy whose planet vanishes all the time. But that pales in comparison to the episode where half the cast goes to Risa, which was just painful. And there was the one where Quark dressed up as a woman, I don't even know what that was meant to be.
'Round my way folks consider the episodes featuring Ferrengi or Cardassians as pretty much the only watchable DS9 episodes. Also episodes where Odo is a miserable curmudgeon, but not episodes where Odo pines for love or acceptance or his people. The episodes of DS9 that suck are the episodes where they ask us to care about Bajoran politics, Dax being a Mary Sue, or Bashir trying to get him some.
I strongly disagree. For one thing, while the build-up to the reveal of the Dominion was pretty mysterious (namely because prior to the appearance of the founders the writers didn't have any more of an idea than the audience...), once revealed the races that make up the Dominion revealed themselves to be pretty shallow and uninteresting caricatures.
For another thing, the politics of the Federation began to creepily mirror the worst parts of American foreign policy as the Dominion war went on. Actually, the Federation is the belligerent party.
The war starts because the Dominion doesn't want the Federation entering it's sovereign territory. The Federation says, "Fuck you!" and continues to intrude on the Gamma Quadrant. Then the Dominion makes a strategic alliance with the Cardassians, and the Federation says, "Fuck you!" and mines the worm hole.
Truthfully before The Dominion War the basic situation was that you had the various Gamma Quadrant races meeting The Federation, stopping by to play games, hunting down a Tosk, etc... in stand alone episodes. The only real Alpha Quadrant race that got involved in the Gamma Quadrant heavily was The Ferengi with The Grand Nagus originally trying to set up Quark to act as his middleman. An early plot involves things getting out of hand with The Ferengi due to their dishonesty, specifically becaue The Federation isn't involved. Indeed in some early episodes where they are negotiating to corner the market on "Tulaberry Wine" they are just hearing about The Founders, nobody is showing up and saying "hey your invading our territory" but even then apparently The Founders are starting to quietly infiltrate The Alpha Quadrant probably through trade, because by the time you first see The Founders (when Odo and Kira locate them) I seem to remember them mentioning they had already started infiltrating, and pretty much tell Odo flat out what they plan which is why he doesn't join The Link.
That said there was a bit of a criticism of US policy in the form of the whole Marquis concept, but it's not quite what many would think it is. It had a lot to do with the US not protecting it's own interests and citizens abroad, in order to try and maintain relations with a bunch of evil scumbags that were simply incapable of ever being friends or allies as they existed, the most you could do is buy an uneasy peace, and in this case that peace was coming directly at the expense of people that the US was supposed to be protecting. It was a very general statement but it involved everything from the early Isreal Palestinian conflicts, to the US stabbing it's own businesses in the back in favor of pursueing long term economic strategy with other countries, and a lot of other things. To some it was actually called eerily prophetic when 9/11 happened because a lot of the sacrifices being made were specifically to appease The Middle East. This is also a big part of why there was such a huge push for how we were going to "win the peace" and "reform" the region bringing women's sufferage to the region, protecting American interests since we were having tourists kidnapped and killed down there, and everything else, basically committing to do all of the things we should have been doing to begin with, but it was to late to do. It was about a lot of things, not just that, but basically the US getting into bed with a lot of bad people to buy short term peace at the expense of things it never should have given up or stopped pursueing. Many will probably disagree with it, and I'm sure there are probably statements somewhere saying this isn't true, but that was a big part of it. It drew from a lot of differant sources though.
The thing to consider though is that Star Trek doesn't quite have any direct political analogies, which is why attempts to say "this race represents this people" don't work. In general it's common to try and say for example The Ferengi represent whomever you don't like (like the US for capitalism if your a US basher) but it's not always that straightforward, since when real analogies are intended who the players represent can change, though in the scope of a metaplot the Federation is always generally cast as the good guys, whatever that may entail. The lesson from things like the Marquis was to approach a touchy subject, showing a failure of the Federation's general doctrine of "peace and diplomacy first" because by making a compromise in the name of peace, and perhaps on some levels sparing a great number of people, it ultimatly did the wrong thing. Leading to a situation where you had people leaving The Federation to do the right thing, and constant comments by the Marquis that they were not enemies of The Federation (and wouldn't attack it) causing some interesting situations as they fought the Cardassians. The bottom line being they continued fighting a war The Federation never should have abandoned, and The Federation wound up trying to police a bunch of people in the name of a treaty they never should have made to begin with, as shown in episodes where say a duplicate of Riker uncovers a secret Cardassian fleet being built. It's also notable that for all the concerns about the war with Cardassia, and all the fronts The Federation was engaged on, had the Federation persisted a lot of later problems never would have transpired. That peace with the Cardiassians greatly contributed to the sequence of events that ultimatly lead to a Cardassian/Dominion alliance almost destroying everything.
I'll also say that sometimes Trek gets more historical than current (even if people don't see it). There might not even be a US analogy in a given story. I seem to vaguely remember analogies to the Bulshavik revolution, French Revolution, Prussia, and other things coming up at various times over the years. As well as general issues like whether or not it's right or proper to mess with an indiginous people, paralleling everything from the Spanish and the Aztecs, to the Europeans and Native Americans, to I believe at one point The Japanese and the Anu. Something which goes both ways incidently and sometimes in a contridictory fashion where the morality espoused in episodes might not entirely match depending on the writer... the whole "do we violate The Prime Directive in this case or not?" is a common
recycled theme. I tend to agree mostly with the old series "Venus Prime" (books) personally where the joke is that a version of "The Prime Directive" (even called that if I remember) is created specifically for political reasons to cripple the effectiveness of a space exploration program. I think I'm remember the right one. It's intended as a humorous aside in a bigger plot though, it's actually the good guys that are doing it for more or less the right reasons whuich have nothing to do with Space Exploration. More or less "the best way to screw with something is to add layers of bureaucracy and implausible operating guidelines".