Worst episode of your favorite TV show(s)

Recommended Videos

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Katatori-kun said:
Crono1973 said:
Katatori-kun said:
Crono1973 said:
CPunchMaster said:
There's a couple episodes of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine that come to mind. The one where Dax falls in love with a guy whose planet vanishes all the time. But that pales in comparison to the episode where half the cast goes to Risa, which was just painful. And there was the one where Quark dressed up as a woman, I don't even know what that was meant to be.
Most of the Ferengi episodes suck but atleast they were better than TNG's Ferengi episodes like The Last Outpost.
You're kidding!

'Round my way folks consider the episodes featuring Ferrengi or Cardassians as pretty much the only watchable DS9 episodes. Also episodes where Odo is a miserable curmudgeon, but not episodes where Odo pines for love or acceptance or his people. The episodes of DS9 that suck are the episodes where they ask us to care about Bajoran politics, Dax being a Mary Sue, or Bashir trying to get him some.
The best DS9 episodes were about the Dominion War.
Seems my prior post got eaten.

I strongly disagree. For one thing, while the build-up to the reveal of the Dominion was pretty mysterious (namely because prior to the appearance of the founders the writers didn't have any more of an idea than the audience...), once revealed the races that make up the Dominion revealed themselves to be pretty shallow and uninteresting caricatures.

For another thing, the politics of the Federation began to creepily mirror the worst parts of American foreign policy as the Dominion war went on. Actually, the Federation is the belligerent party.

The war starts because the Dominion doesn't want the Federation entering it's sovereign territory. The Federation says, "Fuck you!" and continues to intrude on the Gamma Quadrant. Then the Dominion makes a strategic alliance with the Cardassians, and the Federation says, "Fuck you!" and mines the worm hole.
Not entirely true actually. The Founders are basically paranoid xenophobes that fear all other "lesser" races and feel the only way to be safe is to effectively conquer and control them. The only races they trust are ones they themselves genetically engineered to serve them. It was made pretty clear that The Dominion would have invaded no matter what happened. It's also an issue where they have basically enslaved all of the races serving them and keep them in line under the jackboot of their military to prevent them from ever being a threat. The Dominion plays the entire diplomatic game to build up forces and tries to behave reasonably, but it's actually not. Heck, they had a few scenes where Gul Ducat was sitting around getting his evil on about what a facist jerkwad he was, only to have Jeffery Combs' Vorta character quietly outdo him... whose the bigger psychopath? Does it matter? The Vorta said half a dozen times they pretty much were going to take the entire Alpha Quadrant, it was only a question of whether you joined them willingly and got treated better, or got stomped into the mud. Their whole strategy was to maintain an uneasy peace, infiltrate, play the factions against each other, and then send in a huge military force.

Truthfully before The Dominion War the basic situation was that you had the various Gamma Quadrant races meeting The Federation, stopping by to play games, hunting down a Tosk, etc... in stand alone episodes. The only real Alpha Quadrant race that got involved in the Gamma Quadrant heavily was The Ferengi with The Grand Nagus originally trying to set up Quark to act as his middleman. An early plot involves things getting out of hand with The Ferengi due to their dishonesty, specifically becaue The Federation isn't involved. Indeed in some early episodes where they are negotiating to corner the market on "Tulaberry Wine" they are just hearing about The Founders, nobody is showing up and saying "hey your invading our territory" but even then apparently The Founders are starting to quietly infiltrate The Alpha Quadrant probably through trade, because by the time you first see The Founders (when Odo and Kira locate them) I seem to remember them mentioning they had already started infiltrating, and pretty much tell Odo flat out what they plan which is why he doesn't join The Link.

That said there was a bit of a criticism of US policy in the form of the whole Marquis concept, but it's not quite what many would think it is. It had a lot to do with the US not protecting it's own interests and citizens abroad, in order to try and maintain relations with a bunch of evil scumbags that were simply incapable of ever being friends or allies as they existed, the most you could do is buy an uneasy peace, and in this case that peace was coming directly at the expense of people that the US was supposed to be protecting. It was a very general statement but it involved everything from the early Isreal Palestinian conflicts, to the US stabbing it's own businesses in the back in favor of pursueing long term economic strategy with other countries, and a lot of other things. To some it was actually called eerily prophetic when 9/11 happened because a lot of the sacrifices being made were specifically to appease The Middle East. This is also a big part of why there was such a huge push for how we were going to "win the peace" and "reform" the region bringing women's sufferage to the region, protecting American interests since we were having tourists kidnapped and killed down there, and everything else, basically committing to do all of the things we should have been doing to begin with, but it was to late to do. It was about a lot of things, not just that, but basically the US getting into bed with a lot of bad people to buy short term peace at the expense of things it never should have given up or stopped pursueing. Many will probably disagree with it, and I'm sure there are probably statements somewhere saying this isn't true, but that was a big part of it. It drew from a lot of differant sources though.

The thing to consider though is that Star Trek doesn't quite have any direct political analogies, which is why attempts to say "this race represents this people" don't work. In general it's common to try and say for example The Ferengi represent whomever you don't like (like the US for capitalism if your a US basher) but it's not always that straightforward, since when real analogies are intended who the players represent can change, though in the scope of a metaplot the Federation is always generally cast as the good guys, whatever that may entail. The lesson from things like the Marquis was to approach a touchy subject, showing a failure of the Federation's general doctrine of "peace and diplomacy first" because by making a compromise in the name of peace, and perhaps on some levels sparing a great number of people, it ultimatly did the wrong thing. Leading to a situation where you had people leaving The Federation to do the right thing, and constant comments by the Marquis that they were not enemies of The Federation (and wouldn't attack it) causing some interesting situations as they fought the Cardassians. The bottom line being they continued fighting a war The Federation never should have abandoned, and The Federation wound up trying to police a bunch of people in the name of a treaty they never should have made to begin with, as shown in episodes where say a duplicate of Riker uncovers a secret Cardassian fleet being built. It's also notable that for all the concerns about the war with Cardassia, and all the fronts The Federation was engaged on, had the Federation persisted a lot of later problems never would have transpired. That peace with the Cardiassians greatly contributed to the sequence of events that ultimatly lead to a Cardassian/Dominion alliance almost destroying everything.

I'll also say that sometimes Trek gets more historical than current (even if people don't see it). There might not even be a US analogy in a given story. I seem to vaguely remember analogies to the Bulshavik revolution, French Revolution, Prussia, and other things coming up at various times over the years. As well as general issues like whether or not it's right or proper to mess with an indiginous people, paralleling everything from the Spanish and the Aztecs, to the Europeans and Native Americans, to I believe at one point The Japanese and the Anu. Something which goes both ways incidently and sometimes in a contridictory fashion where the morality espoused in episodes might not entirely match depending on the writer... the whole "do we violate The Prime Directive in this case or not?" is a common
recycled theme. I tend to agree mostly with the old series "Venus Prime" (books) personally where the joke is that a version of "The Prime Directive" (even called that if I remember) is created specifically for political reasons to cripple the effectiveness of a space exploration program. I think I'm remember the right one. It's intended as a humorous aside in a bigger plot though, it's actually the good guys that are doing it for more or less the right reasons whuich have nothing to do with Space Exploration. More or less "the best way to screw with something is to add layers of bureaucracy and implausible operating guidelines". :)
 

Hawk of Battle

New member
Feb 28, 2009
1,191
0
0
Shanicus said:
Stargate SG-1: Hathor. OH SWEET LORD, HATHOR.

Star Trek: Next Generation - Any episode focusing on Troi. Just... no.

Sliders - The 4th season. There is no such thing as a '5th season' of Sliders.

Andromeda - Quite a bit of Season 4 and 5, honestly. I just... don't know what they were doing there, and I doubt none of the actors knew either.
I see your "Hathor" and raise you that earlier season 1 ep with the mongolian based culture (can't remember the name now), where Carter has a knife fight wth a tribal chief. It is so painful to watch.

I'll give you all the rest, though I would probably bring Sliders forwards to all of season 3 onwards and Andromeda to the second half of season 2 onwards. I don't know what the fuck was going on there either.
 

Alex Baas

New member
Dec 2, 2011
158
0
0
The entire sixth season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. My god what were they thinking!!

Episode 5 of Trinity Blood. I know it basically sets up the entire series from there but still, IT SOOOOO BOOORING
 

Eddie the head

New member
Feb 22, 2012
2,327
0
0
Mr Mystery Guest said:
I loved Star Trek Voyager at the time but when you compare it to Farscape and Firefly it is a boring lumbering elephant looking for a place to die. With the exception of maybe three episodes i realize that it was just middle-of-the-road recycled crap.
I liked the ones about the Doctor. That's about it. I think it was "living witness" or something. I really liked that one.
 

ninjapenguin1414

New member
Jun 16, 2011
105
0
0
AT God said:
I hate the episode of Futurama where they talk about Fry's dog, I can't remember the name of the episode but it is very depressing, especially the end where they say his dog must have forgotten about Fry and then they do a timelapse of Fry's dog waiting for him outside the pizzaria until it dies of old age. Heart breaking



SanAndreasSmoke said:
Unfortunately, that episode happened to be the Krusty Krab Training Video, otherwise known as 'that episode where 'POOP' is an fast-food acronym and you don't actually learn the Krabby Patty secret formula at the end'.
quote]

I loved that episode, the part where the narrator is trying to say hoopla and a little fish guy keeps interrupting him so they throw a brick at the guy's head. I loved that bit, always made me laugh and makes me laugh thinking about it.
I'm way to lazy to check if anyone else mentioned this but in Bender's Big Score (or whatever that movie was called) it shows Fry going back in time and you see him with the dog so it technically wasn't waiting for him till it died just a few days.

OT:
Season 6 of Buffy was pretty bad until the last few episodes the villains just sucked and Buffy whining the whole time was just boring and pointless.

The last 5(?) episodes of season 4 of Angel just ruined the whole season that actually had a really good beggining as well messing up Cordelia's character it was all made up for in season 5 though that's probably my favorite season of anything ever.

Doctor Who: I'm gonna jump on the bandwagon and say "Love and Monsters" it was just so pointless which normally wouldn't bother me in a show like Doctor Who but it was also incredibly stupid and just weirder than normal. As well as season 7 (so far, and I've only watched the first 3 episodes) Amy was my favorite companion and they just screwed her character up so much.

Archer: almost any episode with Barry before he gets a turned, him and Archer constantly arguing was just annoying.

Arrested Development: The episodes with the mentally retarded female, they were just so awkward and strange as soon as they were over season 3 got much better.
 

Kashrlyyk

New member
Dec 30, 2010
154
0
0
Friends: Phoebe gets pregnant, the entire plot arc. And season 10 is the worst season because of the writers shoehorning Rachel and Ross, Rachel/Joey and Ross/Charlie fit better.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,526
4,295
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
MLP the royal wedding- so many damn plot holes, just bugs the crap out of me, plus they had to retcon in Cadance and Shining Armor and they didn't have any time for character development so both ended up being really boring.

American Dad episode where they make a clone of Steve- They start having one of them killing cats and that tends to make me violent.

Last two episodes of Soul Eater- I suppose they weren't that bad but compared to how awesome the rest of the show was they sucked as an ending.

Gurran Laggan- the bath house episode. Its a good episode but the ending is rather dark, seems like all the male villians pretty much were allowed to get away and show up later but the female ones in that episode got killed off.
 

Mr Mystery Guest

New member
Aug 1, 2012
108
0
0
Therumancer said:
Mr Mystery Guest said:
I loved Star Trek Voyager at the time but when you compare it to Farscape and Firefly it is a boring lumbering elephant looking for a place to die. With the exception of maybe three episodes i realize that it was just middle-of-the-road recycled crap.
You know, I kind of like Voyager, .........

I absolutely agree. Thou I think I was harsh, there was a lot of good Doctor episodes and I did like 7 of 9 (but if she said "humanity" one more time I would have smashed my tv in).

I went to a convention and actually met Tim Rice who played Tuvok (real nice guy). He told me that the actors who played the human parts were told by the producers to keep their acting to a minimum because the alien characters won't look alien. And that says it all to me. They had the wrong philosophy, Ben Browder acted his socks off in Farscape and made all the alien characters come alive which made for a better program. And Trek was a constructed as a family show so the stories could never go dark when required.

But must say, lots of good female role models so i'll be re-buying the boxsets for my daughter to make her a confident strong minded geek :)
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Katatori-kun said:
Therumancer said:
It was made pretty clear that The Dominion would have invaded no matter what happened.
I don't think so. All Dominion threats to the alpha quadrant were issued after the Federation insisted on violating their territory.

But in any case, the problem that undermines the Dominion war isn't that the in-Universe Dominion were potentially not evil, it's that they were written to be cartoonish supervillains.

That said there was a bit of a criticism of US policy in the form of the whole Marquis concept, but it's not quite what many would think it is. It had a lot to do with the US not protecting it's own interests and citizens abroad, in order to try and maintain relations with a bunch of evil scumbags that were simply incapable of ever being friends or allies as they existed,
I know of few pertinent real-world parallels of that analogy. Especially as a US Citizen who has lived abroad.

The thing to consider though is that Star Trek doesn't quite have any direct political analogies, which is why attempts to say "this race represents this people" don't work.
I'm well aware of that, and I didn't claim that the Federation represented the US directly. But the brazen self-righteous naivety of the Federation as they are portrayed in DS9 is very much a product of the times the show was made in- a time when Americans were often blithely unaware of the way they were perceived by people in countries who had been wronged by American foreign policy. I don't think the writers of the show consciously intended to make a comment on American foreign policy, but rather were swept up in the zeitgeist of the times.
Nah, technically the Gamma Quadrant races made first contact with the Federation and arguably were responsible for several extremely hostile acts that bordered on acts of war, before The Federation even really committed to enter the wormhole seriously. They were treating it very cautiously, only sending a few explorers and such. Their first contact was with the Dosi (I think that's the right species) that showed up and said "hey we like to gamble". Quark cheated them at Dabo and they whipped out some Alien gambling device that force teleported most of the senior staff of the station into a pocket dimension full of tricks and traps, which your lead to believe is lethal, the episode ends with Quark admitting he cheated and begging for mercy for the crew, before the aliens let everyone go and say "hey it was just a game, you didn't really think it was lethal did you?". They Federation just kind of brushed that one off, when technically that was arguably an act of war since they attacked members of another faction, and senior military command personell no less, over a dispute with an independant third party, which was at the end of the day rather petty. Sure it wasn't lethal, but that's pretty even handed to just let it go. The next contact was even worse where a Tosk comes through the wormhole, and gets itself thrown into a brig, a bunch of "Tosk Hunters" come through and pretty much forcibly board the station, and start gunning people down (albiet apparently non-lethally) before finding the Tosk penned up in the Brig and get all butthurt because The Federation ruined their hunt. O'Brien helps the Tosk escape which redeems things, but again this was a case with the Dominion races pretty much coming through the Wormhole and going "hey, who gives a frak who the hell we slap around or why".

The Dominion never bother to introduce themselves, you first time you hear about the central authority if I remember is when the Ferengi are looking to corner the Tulaberry wine trade in the Alpha Quadrant, and you start hearing about The Dominion, how scared all the subject races are having been conquered, and that you can never speak to The Founders, instead everything goes through the Vorta.

You find out The Founder's motives and what they were up to during this time when all was quiet when Odo actually meets them.

As far as being cartoonish super villains, yes and no. Actually what they were was a parallel to things like The Middle Eastern cultures and China, indeed the entire run of DS-9 actually was on a lot of levels. Understand this was pre-911 though. The basic idea was that you were dealing with cultures that were by definition xenophobic maniacs to the bone, without rational motivations, and who might pretend to be your friends, but were actually always planning to stab you in the back. This was when patent violations and copyright problems were becoming an issue with China, and it was becoming clear that trying to change the culture through soft power was not working. It was also a case where we had pretty much watched Saddam who we were very supportive of, stab us in the back, and instead of working to stabilize and reform the region decided to go a-conquering, and what was a lot of two-faced Saudi diplomacy where on one hand the ruling Royals would take our money, pocket all of it, say "we're your friends" but then turn around to their people and start leading "kill Americans" rallies and blaming the US for the economic hardships in the region. A lot of the actual terrorists and their training and materials came from the Saudis, and I believe Bin Ladin himself was a decorated Saudi war hero who was exiled. He was actually a big deal and talking a lot of smack before he got blamed for the 9/11 attacks.

There was a thread in DS-9 about not wanting to recognize threats that are right in front of you, and being too moral and even handed in dealing with peoples that don't deal with it, as well as the tendency to not want to hold a culture or nation responsible for the actions of the leadership when it's not always a seperate thing. The federation basically got itself into crap by being too nice. Points were made early on about how Federation ships were largely designed for exploration and not outright warfare, which is why it was a big deal when they were actually dusting off Warships like The Defiant. It was also too little too late as we saw when DS-9 was taken over and The Federation actually started fighting because it simply didn't have the numbers, or the types of ships, to face threats it wound up letting build. Guys like Thomas Riker (Riker's duplicate) showed them EXACTLY what was going on, as did the Marquis (Eddington) but The Federation refused to acknowlege it, putting principle ahead of reality. There was an 11th hour save by wormhole aliens but the point is that by rights The Federation should have died because of it's own moralism and stupidity.

It's not a mistake that you had a situation where The Dominion were largely motivated by religion. A key element of the entire thing is that The Founders are xenophobes, and they are literally viewed as GODS by their subjects who act for religious reasons. Attempts at diplomacy with the Dominion oftentimes will lead to suicide before looking at things rationally... if that sounds like The Middle East to some extent, you'd be right. Remember before 9/11 we had all kinds of crap going on down there as well.

As far as the Marquis goes, it was a plot device, and not a perfect analogy, but a big part of it was that the US was backstabbing it's own interests in the name of peace and soft power solutions. The US was pretty much limiting what US run companies could do internationally to compete for moral reasons, while letting foreign businesses run roughshod over them. On top of this it was allowing nations like China to steal and counterfeit goods and IPs, as part of a long term economic strategy that was hoping prosperity would ultimalty lead to a more progressive culture. The bottom line being that if a company like say Pfizers with US interests (even if they are French) comes up and says "hey, we spend billions developing that Viagra drug, and testing it to YOUR standards before release, we did everything you asked, and now The Chinese have analyzed it and are manufacturing it and selling it without us getting a cut, despite all of the time, effort, and money we invested, your supposed to protect us, do something about it" and the US doesn't send the military, or really do much of anythin at all... that's a problem, especially when it's compounded by thousands of products, and also in part the result of the US goverment forcing businesses to bring manufacturing to China which lead to them getting a lot of the patents and IPs for them to knock off to begin with. (Please also note Viagra is a general example, I don't remember the exact time frame Pfizers brought that one to the forefront and got smacked down, but it was a big one and pretty much summarizes the problem).

The truth is you can see the problems the US is facing right now, and arguably those of the Western World, as a result of not taking action on problems we saw building during the 1980s or 1990s, following losing strategies, and other assorted things. It's also why the US is increasingly polarized, we very much have a moralistic "peace at any price" movement (left wing), in conflict with those calling for direct action even if it means war and bloodshed (right wing).

This is not to say that Star Trek was saying "right wing is good" it slammed both sides, simply that it was critical of US foreign policy at the time, but not nessicarly in the direction you'd like to think (especially if your Anti-US, even from within the US). 90s Trek basically took the approach that we needed right wing foreign policy, combined with left wing domestic policy... though that is a simplification since it covered a lot of things, and not everything was US-centric.

You ARE correct though that it was calling the Federation naive, but you have to understand it was not because it was mistreating other peoples, it was because it was too tolerant towards them, and sowing the seeds of it's own destruction as a result. This is why they made a big deal about a Galaxy Class ship getting wrecked in an initial encounter with the point that "it's not a warship", and about how "The Defiant" which was more effective (though still getting it's butt kicked in a "too little, too late" sense... being competitive more than superior, and was only one ship) being an actual bona-fide war ship... with The Federation having decided NOT to mass produce Warships. Sort of indicative of the US pretty much sitting on it's hands instead of banging heads when we really should be. A reactive strategy in terms of "we will wait for the other guy to actually attack" lead to a giant Cardassian/Dominion fleet (the Cardies being a faction that should have been blown away early on) pretty much wrecking everything, because the Federation more or less ignored them until it was too late, by the time they rallied they were outnumbered like 3 to 1, and behind the tech curve at least when it came to warfare.

To an extent this was later mirrored in "Enterprise" where Archer comes back to earth and pretty much tells The Federation "you know, when I went out into space I didn't want to do it in command of a warship, I didn't take weapons seriously or feel they were a priority... now I realize, we needed the intended weapons and far, far, more". On some levels while he compromises on his dose of sudden reality there, "Enterprise" as a whole had a very similar message. Archer starts out as a naive, ultra-liberal twit, by the end he's realized you can't live that way, he's engaging in space piracy for the greater good on the behalf of his own people, and has learned that sometimes you need to lead with your phasers and shoot people in the face right off the bat. You need some common sense and restraint of course, but at the end of the day there are groups out there that are just flat out evil from your perspective and don't deserve to be treated like rational human beings, and yes... sometimes innocent people need to suffer for the greater good, Archer stealing the warp core from another ship, pretty much dooming them to death, was kind of a statement on the nessecity of collateral damage. Plenty of moralizing about it, but at the end of the day... well, you see what happened.

Of course it's not a popular point of view given current political trends. I've also kind of suspected that it's one of the reasons why "Star Trek" hasn't seen another series for a while. With things coming to a head I don't think all of the analogies, especially the "big picture" ones would go over well in a polarized nation, and would be more recognizable for what they are. Especially seeing as there DOES seem to be a very left wing trend in the media to pretty much promote exactly the kind of naivity and relations Trek ultimatly presented as bad in a big picture sense as the right thing to do. Right now if someone did that episode where Archer finally broke down and stole the warp core/engine, sacrificing a bunch of innocent people who were totally uninvolved for the greater good, there would be more of an outcry because the final bottom line is EXACTLY the kind of thing the media goes out of it's way to get away from nowadays.

But do NOT get me wrong, when Trek uses real world and US analogies (which isn't always) it is not always on the militant/right wing side of things. The overall message (if you must include one) is that it depends on the situation, and as I've said, it tends to be socially very liberal in it's general presentation. It simply goes further to the right in overall message the bigger the picture gets and the higher the stakes, and typically it does so through story arcs rather than individual episodes. Sometimes you see all those little desicians that seemed like the right thing, turn out to be the wrong thing in the big picture.

Ask yourself for a second sometime how things might have played out if The Federation has decided after the whole "Tosk" incident that it was dealing with a group of hostile aliens from the Wormhole right off the bad, maybe not conquerers, but at least generally uncaring of anyone else. Assuming the gamesmen, and Tosk Hunters were the factions closest to the wormhole and the most likely to come through. Instead of putting one station there with some weapons, The Federation puts a fleet there. Looking at the Borg Front, hostile wormhole aliens, etc... it decides to begin producing dedicated warships like The Defiant in earnest. It doesn't actually go on the offensive right off the bat, but more or less simply adopts a less naive policy, it increases security, and becomes better prepared for an increasingly hostile universe in response to the facts it's dealing with. The entire situation plays out differantly, and probably for the better. At the end of the day The Dominion isn't rational, it's going to make it's attempt, it's acting on behalf of xenophobic gods with totally obeidient genetically engineered soldiers, that are also controlled by drugs, but when it comes through it's not likely to either get to the point for forming an alliance with the Cardies, and it's not going to wind up outnumbering Federation forces 3 to 1 or more with those odds beign futher stacked by having dedicated warships while all the Federation ships are at best hybrids.
 

lachlan4567

New member
Sep 21, 2011
63
0
0
There are two types of Breaking Bad fans those who liked the Fly episode and those who hated it and found it the worst in the series. Personally I found it awesome that they made 40 minuets of trying to kill a fly Actually awesome.
 

Weealzabob

New member
Jun 4, 2011
164
0
0
I did not like the most recent Community halloween episode. It was quite funny, and did a decent job paying homage to Scooby Doo, but it just felt shallow. I really hope that it's just the transition phase, and the show settles back into it's groove.

The episode of Family Guy when Meg becomes a hardcore Christian and Brian gets ostracized for being an Atheist. It pisses me off because it portrays people of Faith as bigoted brainwashed fundamentalist idiots. (I know some of them are, but there are many who simply aren't.) And that Non-theists came to the conclusion that there is no God because life can suck, and the Hubble telescope can't see any deity.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Katatori-kun said:
Therumancer said:
Their first contact was with the Dosi (I think that's the right species) that showed up and said "hey we like to gamble".
You mean the Wadi [http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Wadi]. The Dosi [http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Dosi] were a different people. And while the Wadi are the first contact from the other side of the wormhole, as they are not described as members of the Dominion and their territory is not identified, they're irrelevant to a discussion about the Dominion. The same goes for Tosk. Since both of these species appear in the first season, well before the Dominion were first mentioned in the second season, I think the discrepancy here is more a result of the poor writing in DS9. The writers apparently hadn't even thought of the Dominion until the 2nd season, and were quietly hoping you'd forget there were non-Dominion societies on the other side of the wormhole.

The First mention of Dominion violating Federation territory doesn't happen until the finale of season 2: The Jem'Hadar [http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/The_Jem%27Hadar_(episode)]. At that point the Dominion has a representative aggressively enter DS9 to deliver a message. Compared to the routine Federation violating of Dominion territory for the first two seasons, objectively speaking the first aggressor must be the Federation.

The Dominion never bother to introduce themselves,
So? If I walk into Iran over an unmarked desert border, I don't get to claim that I'm immune to criminal charges because no representative of the government ever tracked me down and introduced themselves to me. When you enter another civilization's sovereign territory it's your job to find out who is in charge- not the other way around.

As far as being cartoonish super villains, yes and no. Actually what they were was a parallel to things like The Middle Eastern cultures and China,
I'm guessing you've never been to China, because to suggest that China is a cartoon supervillain or in any way remotely comparable to the Dominion is so laughable I wonder if anything useful can come out of future conversation.

Unless you're proposing that both the Dominion and China are demonized by people who don't know much about them because their government structure is different from the point of view of the protagonists or ourselves, and that is used as an excuse to assume they are evil aggressors with Megalomaniacal ambitions when all the evidence suggests that they are simply trying to protect themselves from being encircled and dominated.

Understand this was pre-911 though.
Yes, I said that in the very post you quote. Would you please quit posting as though you are the only person in this conversation who knows anything?

The basic idea was that you were dealing with cultures that were by definition xenophobic maniacs to the bone, without rational motivations, and who might pretend to be your friends, but were actually always planning to stab you in the back. This was when patent violations and copyright problems were becoming an issue with China, and it was becoming clear that trying to change the culture through soft power was not working.
You just spelled out every criticism I have with the Dominion War as though it supports your argument. The Dominion are cartoon supervillains given irrational motivations... completely unlike real-world rivalries like US-China.

The US was pretty much limiting what US run companies could do internationally to compete for moral reasons, while letting foreign businesses run roughshod over them.
To call this "stabbing it's own interests in the back" is hyperbole bordering on hysteria.

Okay to try and cover all of this:

The Dosi, Wadi, etc... had no objection to The Federation's prescence, and that is who the Alpha Quadrant was dealing with. The Dominion showed up after the fact and said "your intruding on our territory" which means that they are by definition claiming these races as members OF the Dominion and their territory as it's own, and thus taken responsibility, or they had no rights to make the claim to begin with. You can talk about bad writing all you want, but that's the bottom line, and how the sequence of events played out.

As far as the motivations of The Dominion, it's quite straightforward... Xenophobia. It makes complete sense in of itself, and it's also very close to the irrational motivations of The Middle East, or China. Both are motivated by racism and spiritualism to seek to dominate the rest of the world given the oppertunity to do so. Both also inherantly feel superior to all other peoples and feel a sense of destiny. They might play the game of seeming rational at times but the endgame is pretty obvious.

Nowadays a lot of people want to rationalize things and say "well, that's not what these people are like, they are just rivals out to protect themselves"! That's kind of the point DS-9 in paticular was making. You want to assume all people are pretty much the same and have no inherant ill will towards anyone else, or to project anything going on as being YOUR fault rather than that of those on the other side.

Incidently the point of view your espousing is EXACTLY why we stabbed our own interests in the back. We acted under the belief that by limiting ourselves it would prevent conflict and bring about the reform of the negative aspects of those civilizations. In the end The Middle East just became more belligerant and violent, and instead of prosperity leading to reforms within China it simply lead to a lot more money going into their military while they kept the sweatshops and oppression going.

The fact that you disagree with me so intensely, probably has a lot to do with why you didn't "get" DS-9.

To put things into perspective, ever seen any of those videos of Chinese saber rattling where they go off about colonizing the rest of the world? You might notice one recurring piece of propaganda going on where they refer to "The Middle Kingdom" or how "The Middle Kingdom has endured for over 5,000 years" before going off about how pathetic the rest of the world was compared to their civilization. In this context "The Middle Kingdom" is a spiritual referance as much as anything having to do with China and the Chinese being between heaven and earth (in the middle). The destined rulers of the planet to keep mere men in line on behalf of the heavens. Even when not infused with celestrial signifigance it's still used as part of a doctrine of manifest destiny and racial superiority. At the end of the day The Chinese might be a bit more savvy than The Middle East, but their central motives (global domination and the enslavement of lesser races) are very similar albiet you don't see religion being used as openly.

On a lot of levels "The Dominion" was a combination of these forces. The Founders were acting out of a sense of xenophobia and entitlement. Their belief in their inherant superiority due to the way being what they are allows them to see the world, combined with fear of other lesser races killing them out of jealousy, and a belief in their entitlement to rule for both their own protection and due to their superiority despite their limited numbers.

At the end of the day DS-9 could have just used straight genetic engineering to explain how they kept their armies in line and surpressed other species. They didn't though, instead they used religion along with that, the idea of "The Founders Are Our Gods" came up on numerous occasions, rather than straight genetic programming and drug based control. Faith making it so you couldn't rationalize with anyone doing the fighting in The Dominion, since for them right and wrong didn't enter into it, there was only "god". In cases of moral conflict the warriors of the dominion will kill themsleves before turning on their masters, even when shown rational reasons why they should.

While it wasn't a direct analogy, it's sort of like having The Chinese leading The Middle East, if they could convince Mulims of their own divinity or the abillity to speak for divinity.

-

Also while irrelevent to this, you may or may not be aware of some of the contreversies over the end of "The Dominion War", which largely came about due to people "getting" this. That is to say when The Prophets pretty much acted as Ex Deus Machina on a dominion fleet. There were a lot of comments about how the Bajorans could be seen as a Jewish analogy, with the prophets (who actually exist, and are so powerful that they might as well be gods, sort of like Q) actually existing compared to those claiming to be gods being poseurs. This putting Sisko in the odd position of being either The Savior, or the second coming (depending on whether your a Jew Or A Christian) right up to his sacrifice, because in return for saving everyone the Prophets pretty much tell him he might be "Of Bajor" but he was never going to be allowed to find peace there like he wanted.... a sort of sacrifice/cruicifixan analogy, albiet not as intense given that the needs to continue the series.

Or in short, through the analogies they largely called Islam a false religion, that wound up losing when the real god decided to intervene. Some people got that, and for a while there was a bit of back and forth about it.

The point here being that while most of it was politics, there also seems to be some religious snakery in there as well.

That said there is no real point to argueing, it's pretty obvious we're not going to agree. You think what you do, I think what I do.
 

Ron Alphafight

New member
Oct 10, 2012
40
0
0
Any episode of Futurama since it's revival.

Seriously, I've seen all the new episodes hoping it will return to form, but I just keep getting disappointed. If I had to pick one episode, I say the one where they do 3 different animation types in the same show, followed closely by the one where Leela chases the 4th dimensional space whale.

I wish Futurama would have just stopped at season 4 or the movies. But now we get to watch it struggle to not drown in 1ft of water, but it's failing because its arms and legs have been amputated. Absolutely painful.