Worst Films of 2013

Recommended Videos

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
<color=darkred>Previous Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.838209-Best-of-Film-2013>Best of 2013Next Review: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.838380-Other-Films-of-2013>"Other" of 2013
Worst of 2013

I struggled for a while to come up with an opening for a "Worst of 2013" list. Should I make an all-encompassing statement about the majority of films being not-good? Or how about a tangential statement about "Worst of" lists in general? Or, perhaps -- and you'll see this is the on I decided on -- a cop-out that included both of those as well as padding that you might find funny but will probably find annoying. It's always difficult to come up with an introduction, and this isn't a good one.

Like before this "Worst of" list will be done alphabetically, not by ranking. All of these are movies that I would -- and am, by virtue of making this list -- go out of my way to recommend avoiding. They are all bad. Sure, some might be worse than the others, but none of them are worth seeing. I'm not going to set an arbitrary limit to how many films I feel like listing, mostly because there are more than 10 that you should never see in your lifetime. I am including direct-to-video movies on here, too, because @#$% The Starving Games and Sharknado. Sorry. Spoiler alert.

Anyway, here are the films you should never see, unless you hunt bad movies or riff on them with friends (or alone, you loner).

<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.402251-Marter-to-the-Movies-21-and-Over>21 and Over
<img height=200>http://i69.servimg.com/u/f69/16/09/70/40/poster30.jpg
Until I started making this list and looking back at all the films in 2013, I had completely forgotten that 21 and Over was a thing. Then I remembered how unfunny and dull it was, which is likely why I forgot about it. It has three teens running around a small town and college campus, all while looking for the house of one of them. It's not funny, it's not offensive, and it's not interesting. This type of genre needs to die.
After Earth
<img height=200>http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/16/09/70/40/poste105.jpg
Will Smith telling son Jaden what to do for 90+ minutes while exploring a futuristic Earth where everything has evolved to kill humans -- despite humans no longer living on the planet -- and directed by the guy who hasn't done a genuinely good -- and not funny-good -- movie in more than a decade? Yeah, how did that go wrong? This is boring, has terrible special effects, and showcases a talentless Jaden Smith in the lead.
<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.826949-Marter-to-the-Movies-Getaway>Getaway
<img height=200>http://i71.servimg.com/u/f71/16/09/70/40/poster33.jpg
I maintain that, someday, Getaway is going to wind up being a cult classic. It stars Ethan Hawke and Selena Gomez and has the two of them in car chases for 90 minutes. It's shot poorly, it's edited too rapidly, the dialogue is incessantly annoying, and there aren't any thrills to be had. It has a single minute of good filmmaking which is only highlighted because the rest is so incredibly awful.
A Good Day to Die Hard
<img height=200>http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/16/09/70/40/poste106.jpg
I had a bit of hope going into the fifth Die Hard, mostly because an insane number of people hate the fourth one even though I found it fun, but this is a franchise killer. It is so painfully uninteresting and uninvolving that I can't see them getting to the planned sixth installment. Bruce Willis has done a number of terrible direct-to-video films in recent years, but this comes close to worsting them all.
The Hangover Part III
<img height=200>http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/16/09/70/40/poste107.jpg
If there was ever a franchise I was quote-unquote "gunning for," it would be The Hangover. I've hated this series from day one; the only enjoyment I've ever gotten out of them was from Mike Tyson. I hate the premise, I hate the characters, and I don't think any of it's funny -- or even that offensive, for that matter. Part III is somehow more sanitized, and it doesn't have Mike Tyson in it -- and he showed up in Grudge Match! This is a humorless pile of garbage and I pray that the filmmakers keep their promise and bury the franchise for good.
<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.404622-Marter-to-the-Movies-The-Host>The Host
<img height=200>http://i69.servimg.com/u/f69/16/09/70/40/poster60.jpg
I've been one of the few -- seemingly, at least -- to defend the Twilight series, but there's no defending Stephanie Meyer's The Host. The sci-fi is poor, the romance doesn't work, the central premise could have been interesting but it's not, and the action -- what little the film attempts -- is awful. It's too long and the only joy to be gleaned from it comes from the unintentional laugh category.
The Last Stand
<img height=200>http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/16/09/70/40/poste108.jpg
There was a good movie starring an aging action star that came out in 2013, but it wasn't The Last Stand; that honor goes to Bullet to the Head, if you're wondering. The Last Stand is a boring, unfunny and terribly staged action film. Its stakes are low, it's terribly predictable, and it's a reminder that Arnold Schwarzenegger's best role is still the one that required him to do the only acting he can do: stay stoic for a film's entirety. It's intentionally over the top but it's not fun to watch.
<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.409941-Marter-to-the-Movies-The-Purge>The Purge
<img height=200>http://i78.servimg.com/u/f78/16/09/70/40/poster58.jpg
The Purge is a generic home invasion thriller that becomes worse the more you think about its wasted potential. It has a fantastic premise -- all crime becomes legal for 12 hours once every year -- but uses it to stage a far worse version of The Strangers. It's not the worst movie, but it's the one that wasted the most potential.
R.I.P.D.
<img height=200>http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/16/09/70/40/poste109.jpg
How does Men in Black, which has a similar premise and came out in 1997, have more humor, better action, and more impressive special effects than R.I.P.D., which came out in 2013? It's because the people who made Men in Black cared about the property and didn't do it for a paycheck. R.I.P.D. is so poor that even Jeff Bridges can't spice it up.
Rapture-Palooza
<img height=200>http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/16/09/70/40/poste110.jpg
Of all the "end of the world" movies we had in 2013, Rapture-Palooza somehow managed to be one of them. It's not a good example of the genre, either. It's a "comedy," although it's far less funny than it should be given ... actually, it's only true comedic actors are Craig Robinson and Rob Corddry. Robinson improvises an over-the-top and satirical character, but it doesn't work. Corddry is in the supporting role and gets little to work with. This one wastes a fun premise and while it was made on the cheap as a "break" film for its actors, it's barely even watchable.
<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.825760-2-50-Reviews-Sharknado-2013>Sharknado
<img height=200>http://i71.servimg.com/u/f71/16/09/70/40/poster22.jpg
Sharknado went viral in 2013 and for a day or two took over Twitter. I had to see it. It's awful. It's supposed to be enjoyed ironically. I get that. But I couldn't do it. It's boring, has terrible actors and special effects, has no sense of peril, and isn't even funny -- intentionally or unintentionally. It's just stupid. And the "sharknado" part barely even factored in. There's apparently already a sequel on the way so let's hope it isn't quite as bad.
<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.834553-2-50-Reviews-The-Starving-Games-2013>The Starving Games
<img height=200>http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/16/09/70/40/poster60.jpg
Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer should stop making movies. They're no longer funny. They're not clever, they're not enjoyable, and they're not watchable. Just stop. You two have probably made a good chunk of money, so call it quits now. The Starving Games is terrible on every measurable level.

Here are the films that I didn't get to see that I figure might have contended for a spot on this list: 47 Ronin, The Big Wedding, The Canyons, Diana, Escape from Planet Earth, Grown Ups 2, A Haunted House, Identity Thief, InAPPropriate Comedy, Jack the Giant Slayer, The Last Exorcism Part II, The Lone Ranger, The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones, Paranoia, Planes, The Smurfs 2, Texas Chainsaw 3D.

Agree? Disagree? Want to kill me? Feel like saying I'm wrong (because opinions aren't a thing)? Let's do that. Tell me.

<color=D6D9DA>_________________________________________________________________________________

If you wish to be notified whenever a new review is posted, please join this <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/2-50-Reviews>user group.
For an archive of all my previous movie reviews, please go <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.284075-2-50-Reviews-Archive>here.
Talk to me on the Twitter, <url=https://twitter.com/martertweet>@martertweet.
 

Alarien

New member
Feb 9, 2010
441
0
0
Sharknado: Meant to be enjoyed ironically...

I agree. That's what it was meant to be. The problem with this is that it has become a thing for various media outlets.

Nothing should be "meant to be enjoyed ironically." Frankly, we shouldn't even be using that word because it's overused and misused constantly.

We need to stop giving anyone any sort of encouragement or credit for this kind of crap. Enjoying something despite it's awfulness should be something that happens for reasons that were not intended. I like to think of the original House as being a movie, not unlike Evil Dead that was trying hard to be something (horror) that, despite honest effort, it just wasn't. It was not "meant" to be ironically enjoyed. It was meant to be scary, but ended up being generally funny. That IS ironic, specifically because it was not intended.

All of these goddawful attempts to make something that should be enjoyed simply because they are bad need to be given the cold shoulder and income failure they deserve. We need to stop encouraging or paying for this drek. I thought it was bad enough when the Sci-Fi channel was honestly trying to make movies that just ended up being terrible. When they went over the top and started trying to make bad movies... I just gave up.
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,453
2,022
118
Country
USA
I thought "The Last Stand" was OK. The pool scene in "Bullet to the Head" was better than anything in TLS, but TLS had a light enough tone and some fun. To be considered really good, it needed to avoid several mis-steps. What was the ultimate plan for Luis Guzman? They nearly wasted him for no good reason! They have a military grade sharp shooter on their side. He gets little to no use. When it comes down to it, car vs. car, they do it in a corn field that obscures the action. But it had some good stuff too, like Johnny Knoxville and a credible explanation as to where the good guys have access to some bitchin stuff!

A C+
 

MrBaskerville

New member
Mar 15, 2011
871
0
0
I haven't seen that many bad films from 2013 but the worst is a tie between Only God Forgives (Looks great, Sounds great, but it's soooo void of actual content. The story is so shallow and without the stylized look, there wouldn't be any substance left), Die Hard (Euch... i think i'm starting to dislike Bruce Willis :/), Oblivion and The Hobbit 2. Had i seen the movies, i'm pretty sure that Scary Movie V, Starving Games and Movie 43 would top my list, i'm never going to watch them, but i can easily imagine how awful they must be, just from clips and past experience.

Best movie is a bit harder, there was so many good films to choose from: The Great Gatsby, AntiViral, The Conjuring, Lords Of Salem (Yeah yeah i know, same thing as Only God Forgives, only i liked this one and i cared about the characters^^), Place Beyond The Pines, Gravity and a lot of movies that i haven't seen yet. Gatsby might actually be my favourite so far, which kinda surprises me.
 

Vausch

New member
Dec 7, 2009
1,476
0
0
Man of Steel topped my list for worst movies of the year.

I will grant, I don't see movies unless I think I'll enjoy them or if I have friends with me to riff on it. I hate wasting time at bad movies, and Man of Steel feels like it owes me 2 1/2 hours and my money back. I hate how dreary it is, the lack of colour, the idiotic characters (Every Krytponian is a goddamn moron, Clark included), the mopy tone, and the piss-poor non-linear story just made me beg for it to end.

Didn't care about the Zod killing though. Happened in the comics, happened in the Richard Donner movie, Superman isn't above killing but he does everything in his power to avoid it if he can.
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
I get your reasoning for why sharknado is there, but i feel like a movie like it and inAPPropriate are meant to be givens for the list and go without saying. I mean, when was the last time a syfy channel movie was good or even expected to be good?
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
emeraldrafael said:
I get your reasoning for why sharknado is there, but i feel like a movie like it and inAPPropriate are meant to be givens for the list and go without saying. I mean, when was the last time a syfy channel movie was good or even expected to be good?
Sharknado was actually well-received, critically.

I didn't see InAPPropriate Comedy but I did see Movie 43 and it's not on the list. Worst movies are worst movies. I don't agree they don't deserve a spot because they're obligatory. Using that logic a movie like The King's Speech doesn't deserve on a "Best of" list.
 

shogunblade

New member
Apr 13, 2009
1,542
0
0
I did see inAPPropriate Comedy, and I felt it was the worst movie ever made because of an arbitrary rule I made that states, "If a movie calls itself a movie, it is not a movie but a series of sketches, and thus, does not count", so Vince Offer's 'Underground Comedy Movie' does not count, but his spiritual sequel does. Movie 43 at least made me laugh in a few spots.

A friend of mine owns Rapture-Palooza, and I couldn't finish it. Marter, I applaud you for doing that much. I thought it was poorly acted (A scene where a Twinkie factory or some such gets destroyed and the father overreacting to the news was cringe worthy), Craig Robinson is on autopilot and Rob Corddry is nowhere near approaching funny to me in this film, and that Anna Kendrick is reduced to narrating and not much else is a crime.

R.I.P.D. was bad, and considering that I am not a big fan of Men in Black must say a bunch. The actors are good (Well, Jeff Bridges was good), but the movie is uninspired and not funny. What shocks me is that R.I.P.D. is actually two minutes shorter than Men in Black, but it goes on forever. Also, I won't spoil the bad guy because nobody else has, if they can avoid it (I bet you can deduce who it is in the first 10 minutes), but why does the Big Bad in the movie get a digital crack in his face and he's suddenly a demon, but everybody else has to look like a CGI Monstrosity and they are demons? Preferential treatment? I don't know, all I know is that it was bad.

A decent (if not painful) list, Here's hoping 2014 doesn't suck as much.
 

hermes

New member
Mar 2, 2009
3,865
0
0
Marter said:
<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.834553-2-50-Reviews-The-Starving-Games-2013>The Starving Games
<img height=200>http://i55.servimg.com/u/f55/16/09/70/40/poster60.jpg
Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer should stop making movies. They're no longer funny. They're not clever, they're not enjoyable, and they're not watchable. Just stop. You two have probably made a good chunk of money, so call it quits now. The Starving Games is terrible on every measurable level.
Where they ever funny? I mean, Scary Movie was kind of original at the time, but I wouldn't call it a great comedy, and I can't think of any movie they made ever since that wasn't aggressively unfunny.
 

Marter

Elite Member
Legacy
Oct 27, 2009
14,276
19
43
hermes200 said:
Where they ever funny? I mean, Scary Movie was kind of original at the time, but I wouldn't call it a great comedy, and I can't think of any movie they made ever since that wasn't aggressively unfunny.
I liked Scary Movie. And Vampires Suck had some good moments as far as I'm concerned.
 

Habballah

New member
Sep 25, 2013
21
0
0
I find it funny certain critics talk about "you don't need to be told certain movies are bad, you already know."and than include after earth.

old territory, old apparent territory. I enjoyed last stand. was it corney? It was an arnold movie. hating on last stand for anything it does is pretty much hating on borne movie for basically doing the same thing every damn movie.