Worst Weapon Evar

Recommended Videos

Dragon Zero

No one of note
Apr 16, 2009
710
0
0
The Zodiac from the second Ratchet and Clank game. It cost about 1.5 million, had four rounds total (costing 4000 each), took forever to fire, and almostalways missed quite a few enemies. The Zapper is also in the game, it attaches to Cank but does the same damage as pissing in their direction, along with being the price of the Zodiac.

If you want real life weapons, try looking up the Chauchat Machine Gun.
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
Kukul said:
A double-bladed lightsaber. Sure it seems to be the coolest thing ever, but it could cut off your legs before you could even realise how dumb that design is.
That doesn't make it a dumb weapon, it just means that anybody using it without a major amount of training with one is an idiot.
 

0p3rati0n

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,885
0
0
The Aririska, type 100,type 99, nambu. Just about any WWII Japanese gun. Not that japanese people are bad. Just their guns are. But just during WWII. the guns jammed too much. Don't let World at war fool you.
 

JoshasorousRex

New member
Dec 5, 2008
583
0
0
A cardboard box or a remote.

"I will make it dark for you!! HA! Now bow down for you are blind!"

"No, STFU I mute you!"
 

Squedee

New member
Apr 3, 2009
383
0
0
JoshasorousRex said:
A cardboard box or a remote.

"I will make it dark for you!! HA! Now bow down for you are blind!"

"No, STFU I mute you!"
not true, you could hit them with the remote
 

L-J-F

New member
Jun 22, 2008
302
0
0
OK, worst ever? I was thinking that this would be about worst weapons in games, but my example would fit the real world too:

Machinegun from Quake 3 Arena ...
 

Nifty

New member
Sep 30, 2008
305
0
0
Words. They're no match for a good brick.

Then pen also. Let's see you, Edward Bulwer-Lytton, pitch that against a no messing claymore, clever clogs.
 

JoshasorousRex

New member
Dec 5, 2008
583
0
0
Squedee said:
JoshasorousRex said:
A cardboard box or a remote.

"I will make it dark for you!! HA! Now bow down for you are blind!"

"No, STFU I mute you!"
not true, you could hit them with the remote
Yeah but then what do you think the other person's going to do? The remote can't be that deadly can it? It would just piss the person off

*hit bad guy with remote*

"Gah! What the hell was that! You you're dead!!"

"Oh god change channel, CHANGE CHANNEL!!!"
 

Squedee

New member
Apr 3, 2009
383
0
0
JoshasorousRex said:
Squedee said:
JoshasorousRex said:
A cardboard box or a remote.

"I will make it dark for you!! HA! Now bow down for you are blind!"

"No, STFU I mute you!"
not true, you could hit them with the remote
Yeah but then what do you think the other person's going to do? The remote can't be that deadly can it? It would just piss the person off

*hit bad guy with remote*

"Gah! What the hell was that! You you're dead!!"

"Oh god change channel, CHANGE CHANNEL!!!"
you hit them with it like a club
JoshasorousRex said:
Squedee said:
pancakes hands down


I agree, waffles would be an even better weapon :p
no, but the waffle iron perhaps..
 

MusicalFreedom

New member
May 9, 2009
456
0
0
Let's speak ethically for a bit.

I think that land mines are the worst weapon.

Tactically, they're used to slow down movement and secure borders. It could be said that they're more of a deterrent - simply knowing that there are landmines ahead of you is enough to bring you to a halt. They also serve as a force multiplier - they boost the defense of an area without needing any more people.

Land mines are not designed specifically to kill. Killing is a side effect of the blast. No, land mines are designed to maim. To incapacitate you. To tear your arms and legs from your body. To blind you with your own blood and charred flesh.

This, in itself, is an unethical tactic. Sure, to you an incapacitated enemy is just as good as a dead enemy - neither can fight against you. But what of the victim? Is it a requirement to be humane during a war - to kill, but not cause unnecessary suffering, even to the enemy? The enemy, for the most part, is just another soldier doing his job. Should he be confined to a lifetime of hospital visits, sitting in a wheelchair, burns covering his bandaged face?

Let's not forget that landmines stay in the ground after conflict. Quarrels between two nations can become calm, but does that disarm the land mines? No. These horrific remanants of an old conflict can still cause further pain. As far as they are concerned, the war is still going on, and they lie, waiting for that footstep so that it may do its job. Its job is to maim, and it does so indiscriminately. Soldier, civilian, animal, child. It doesn't care.

It is estimated that over 75 countries are plagued with land mines.

That is why land mines are the worst weapon ever.
 

hopeneverdies

New member
Oct 1, 2008
3,398
0
0
L-J-F said:
OK, worst ever? I was thinking that this would be about worst weapons in games, but my example would fit the real world too:

Machinegun from Quake 3 Arena ...
I know, there is absolutely no weapon balance in that game. Though I would say the beam sniper if using a track pad or the gauntlet, in that game.

I would say the shurikens in Ninja Gaiden DS, only effective on archers and anything else is like breathing on them.
 

Dr.Sean

New member
Apr 5, 2009
788
0
0
The frag grenades from most modern FPSes. Show me one game, except ones with gravity manipulators/you can pick them up, where they don't eat moar shit than a starved public toilet.