WOTW: Alien Invasions are Useless

Recommended Videos

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,077
0
0
All the alien invasion tropes are basically Huns/Mongols/various barbarians causing all manner of mayhem to the established order and scaring the crap outta the locals. You could set a film in 5th-century Rome or 14th-century Eastern Europe and use all the same alien invasion tropes, just minus the sci-fi part.
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
TheNumber1Zero said:
Furburt said:
It's just a good way of putting forward that 'hordes of the unknown' fear we've had into modern media. I mean, we know about everything on earth now, nothing is unknown. Aliens, we know nothing about.
So they've figured out the whole "Bermuda Triangle" thing already? Please do enlighten me.
I hate to bring it up because everyone always complains about it being overused on the Escapist, but...
http://www.cracked.com/article_16671_p2.html
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
SakSak said:
Let's see now, where have I seen somewhat intelligent reasons for Aliens to invade...

X-COM (3):Apocalypse. Two alien races have fought a war in another dimension. Too bad the war has left the dimension dying, the planet a barren wasteland. But wait! There are dimensional gates. Good news, on the other side is a relative resource-rich, stable planet. Better news, it is inhabited by bipedal monkey look-a-likes who are sooo easy to take over. Too bad the race they currently inhabit has a tendency of dying in the new atmosphere, so they can't just go in and nuke/irradiate everyone on the other side of the dimensional gate, they need humans to act as hosts for at least in the intermediate timescale until you adapt and upgrade the infrastructure to their needs.

And not until this proves impossible until X-com has been eliminated do they begin to issue real war-gear to their troops instead of infiltration/takeover tech.

(X-COM 1) UFO: Enemy Unknown. Because they do not need resources so much as they need DNA samples. The fact that they see no need for asking permission from the local primitives (humans) or have no consideration for returning the subjects alive (after cutting them open without anesthesics to study organs, harvest DNA etc) coupled with the fact that when liquefied humans make extremely tasty source of protein means the conflict is ready.

There are other examples. Wh40k Universe for example:
Tau (want their own empire under the guise of Greater Good, humans are a major obstacle to this (Mostly because Humans are self-righteous bastards)),

Orks doing it for their main deities Gork and Mork, the twin gods of Brutal Cunning and Cunning Brutality (the other will smash your face in, the other will wait until your back is turned to smash your face in)(the Orks really just like a good fight and humies do know how to give them one),
Dark Eldar (all they want and care about is torture victims for fun),
Chaos (they want our souls by either sacrificing us and/or converting us),
Necrons (who want to kill anything alive) and so on.

Iain Banks' Culture has started a few wars in order to effect a benevolent change. They simply saw no other way of civilizating the target to Culture standards in those cases.

So yeah, there are cases where an alien attack isn't contrived all that much. Only most of the time is it a nonsensical solution that makes us go 'wait, that's why attacked us!?'

EDIT: How could I forget, Master Of Orion 2. The Antarans are attacking because almost all races in the game are decendants or creations of the original Orions. And since the two were bitter enemies, the Antarans decide to take their vengeance on the Orion's 'offspring' as the elder race itself has gone the way of extinction and is thus beyond the reach of the Antarans wrath.
I would hope that advanced races wouldn't want vengence. And what would aliens be fighting amongst themselves for? And taking DNA samples from creatures that attack them in retaliation seems harder than asking us for it (or taking our hair samples). Races wanting their own civilization don't have to destroy others to get it. I've already talked about races doing it for fun (as a side note, when I thought that up I was thinking of the Eldar). Demons and such... ya those probably don't exist. And if they're so advanced then they shouldn't need to fight us to help make our society better (many of us humans even realize that and we're far from space travel).
 

Zacharine

New member
Apr 17, 2009
2,854
0
0
oppp7 said:
I would hope that advanced races wouldn't want vengence.
So would I, but one can never know. Here you are implicitly assuming that cultural and technological development are tied together. This might not necessarily be true, we certainly have examples to the contrary here on Earth and are yet to meet any real life aliens. Wanting vengeance is an emotional reaction, and expecting aliens to not have emotions is somewhat convoluted.

Example of this type of alien (culturally backwater, technologically advanced): Thraddash, from Star Control 2. Their entire culture is based upon the concept of strenght. So they fight eachother all the time. During the game one can find out that they have nuke-bombed themselves into stone-age at least twelve times, always somehow managing to crawl their way out back into the stars.

And what would aliens be fighting amongst themselves for?
Who knows, why are we fighting ourselves for? Why is there not peace on Earth? Power, resources, for the heck of it, to test weaponry, political reasons... All these have acted as reasons for us humans to do war.

Why should we assume things to be different if we simply imagine things on a different scale?

And taking DNA samples from creatures that attack them in retaliation seems harder than asking us for it (or taking our hair samples).
Consider this: You would wish for a DNA sample of a cat and are somewhat amoral. So you go, you take those samples and study them. Curiosity takes over. What does such a creature look like from the inside? Are they all identical? What DNA-bit does what? So you take cats, you cut them open. You study their insides. In the course of this, you find out that cats taste better than a filet mignon prepared by a 5-star Michelin chef.

Other cats have begun to see what you do to them, or at least suspect. So you get a few scratches the next time you get one. And the next one, and the next one. The scratches are beginning to hurt, so you wear protective clothing.

Suddenly the cats have done something strange. They are sharpening their claws against rocks. Again, curiosity gets the better of you. Why are they doing it? How did they come up with doing this? They are just cats, after all, primitive animals that happen to taste good and have a funny DNA.

To your dismay, the next time you got get a few cats, they swarm you and overwhelm you, biting and scrathing you badly. You decide that's it, next time you are bringing a rifle with you, to shoot those that attack you so that you can continue in peace. And for a while it works. But then comes the day when they swarm you again, this time wearing scraps of clothing you've left behind, swarming you from all directions. Before you can shoot the gun, it is forced out of your hands. And as you throw the cats away from you with your hands, the cats do something entirely unexpected. They aim the rifle at you with group effort and pull the trigger. Then they swarm the house you live in, in search of others like you.

Your last thoughts are: Wait a second, are these cats actually intelligent? How could they shoot me back, they are just cats! The only rights they have is what you decided to give them. They are supposed to be primitive animals incapable of being a threat, not a sapient species... -dies-

This is pretty much UFO:enemy unknown plot-line. From the aliens perspective, there is no reason to ask for permission, there is no reason to care of what happens to humans. So they don't.

Races wanting their own civilization don't have to destroy others to get it.
Just like Romans did not have to conquer the Greek and the Spanish? Stricly speaking, no they didn't have to. But they just wanted a big empire, so they went to war to get the lands of others. If the planets an alien race wants are already inhabited by a xenophobic race hellbent on the doom of anyone not like them, war is just a matter of gathering an army, going there and contesting their claim.

And in the case of X-COM:Apocalypse, when the alien race is microscopic and unable to live long times in the new atmosphere (and the old world is about to be destroyed), the only remaining option is to take over the existing civilization: humans. Asking permission is pretty much out, because... well... what would you do if people suddenly were mind-controlled drones subservient to the will of microscopic organisms inhabiting them like parasites, with billions more of them on the way?

In that situation, it really is one or the other. For the aliens to survive, humanity must become mindless dronesfor them to inhabit. For humans to win and keep their minds and bodies intacts, the aliens must either be destroyed or kept from attacking (which results in their destruction as the world they inhabit will go boom).

I've already talked about races doing it for fun (as a side note, when I thought that up I was thinking of the Eldar). Demons and such... ya those probably don't exist.
Of course not, but I'm thinking this all in the terms of 'in-game' justifications so to speak. Since the setting determines the races and their behaviour, you must consider the reasons within the confines of the setting as well. And as I've shown, there are several logical in-setting reasons for warfare all over the games.

And if they're so advanced then they shouldn't need to fight us to help make our society better (many of us humans even realize that and we're far from space travel).
And yet again you assume aliens would think like us. You assume that a space-faring cilivization is by necessity culturally more developed than us.

In addition, you assume that the Culture would have done so to us. I never said that, I said they have started wars. You really have no idea on the situation at hand. Perhaps the equivivalent of Hitler and Stalin are the only two leaders on a planet they went to, and they saw that a war would get rid of the unwanted elements.

You assume far too much. You would be better served by getting rid of those assumptions.
 

Kollega

New member
Jun 5, 2009
5,161
0
0
So, there's no reason for alien invasion. But was there any reason for Holocaust and World War Two? Also yay, Godwin's law!


What i'm saying is that you don't need good reason to invade something and start killing people. Contrived one will suffice.
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,468
0
0
I thought of a reason. Say the aliens have had a problem similar to global warming on their home planet and have come to earth to try and help us (this is asuming aliens are closer to perfection then us). Someone in power (probally a republican) could offend the aliens and tell them they should leave this planet or we will make them. Aliens declare war on earth, end of the world, end of story.
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
Dark knifer said:
I thought of a reason. Say the aliens have had a problem similar to global warming on their home planet and have come to earth to try and help us (this is asuming aliens are closer to perfection then us). Someone in power (probally a republican) could offend the aliens and tell them they should leave this planet or we will make them. Aliens declare war on earth, end of the world, end of story.
Ya, that's not really much of an invasion if it's helping us. And if we attacked them they might just help another country/leave.
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
SakSak said:
oppp7 said:
I would hope that advanced races wouldn't want vengence.
So would I, but one can never know. Here you are implicitly assuming that cultural and technological development are tied together. This might not necessarily be true, we certainly have examples to the contrary here on Earth and are yet to meet any real life aliens. Wanting vengeance is an emotional reaction, and expecting aliens to not have emotions is somewhat convoluted.

Example of this type of alien (culturally backwater, technologically advanced): Thraddash, from Star Control 2. Their entire culture is based upon the concept of strenght. So they fight eachother all the time. During the game one can find out that they have nuke-bombed themselves into stone-age at least twelve times, always somehow managing to crawl their way out back into the stars.

And what would aliens be fighting amongst themselves for?
Who knows, why are we fighting ourselves for? Why is there not peace on Earth? Power, resources, for the heck of it, to test weaponry, political reasons... All these have acted as reasons for us humans to do war.

Why should we assume things to be different if we simply imagine things on a different scale?

And taking DNA samples from creatures that attack them in retaliation seems harder than asking us for it (or taking our hair samples).
Consider this: You would wish for a DNA sample of a cat and are somewhat amoral. So you go, you take those samples and study them. Curiosity takes over. What does such a creature look like from the inside? Are they all identical? What DNA-bit does what? So you take cats, you cut them open. You study their insides. In the course of this, you find out that cats taste better than a filet mignon prepared by a 5-star Michelin chef.

Other cats have begun to see what you do to them, or at least suspect. So you get a few scratches the next time you get one. And the next one, and the next one. The scratches are beginning to hurt, so you wear protective clothing.

Suddenly the cats have done something strange. They are sharpening their claws against rocks. Again, curiosity gets the better of you. Why are they doing it? How did they come up with doing this? They are just cats, after all, primitive animals that happen to taste good and have a funny DNA.

To your dismay, the next time you got get a few cats, they swarm you and overwhelm you, biting and scrathing you badly. You decide that's it, next time you are bringing a rifle with you, to shoot those that attack you so that you can continue in peace. And for a while it works. But then comes the day when they swarm you again, this time wearing scraps of clothing you've left behind, swarming you from all directions. Before you can shoot the gun, it is forced out of your hands. And as you throw the cats away from you with your hands, the cats do something entirely unexpected. They aim the rifle at you with group effort and pull the trigger. Then they swarm the house you live in, in search of others like you.

Your last thoughts are: Wait a second, are these cats actually intelligent? How could they shoot me back, they are just cats! The only rights they have is what you decided to give them. They are supposed to be primitive animals incapable of being a threat, not a sapient species... -dies-

This is pretty much UFO:enemy unknown plot-line. From the aliens perspective, there is no reason to ask for permission, there is no reason to care of what happens to humans. So they don't.

Races wanting their own civilization don't have to destroy others to get it.
Just like Romans did not have to conquer the Greek and the Spanish? Stricly speaking, no they didn't have to. But they just wanted a big empire, so they went to war to get the lands of others. If the planets an alien race wants are already inhabited by a xenophobic race hellbent on the doom of anyone not like them, war is just a matter of gathering an army, going there and contesting their claim.

And in the case of X-COM:Apocalypse, when the alien race is microscopic and unable to live long times in the new atmosphere (and the old world is about to be destroyed), the only remaining option is to take over the existing civilization: humans. Asking permission is pretty much out, because... well... what would you do if people suddenly were mind-controlled drones subservient to the will of microscopic organisms inhabiting them like parasites, with billions more of them on the way?

In that situation, it really is one or the other. For the aliens to survive, humanity must become mindless dronesfor them to inhabit. For humans to win and keep their minds and bodies intacts, the aliens must either be destroyed or kept from attacking (which results in their destruction as the world they inhabit will go boom).

I've already talked about races doing it for fun (as a side note, when I thought that up I was thinking of the Eldar). Demons and such... ya those probably don't exist.
Of course not, but I'm thinking this all in the terms of 'in-game' justifications so to speak. Since the setting determines the races and their behaviour, you must consider the reasons within the confines of the setting as well. And as I've shown, there are several logical in-setting reasons for warfare all over the games.

And if they're so advanced then they shouldn't need to fight us to help make our society better (many of us humans even realize that and we're far from space travel).
And yet again you assume aliens would think like us. You assume that a space-faring cilivization is by necessity culturally more developed than us.

In addition, you assume that the Culture would have done so to us. I never said that, I said they have started wars. You really have no idea on the situation at hand. Perhaps the equivivalent of Hitler and Stalin are the only two leaders on a planet they went to, and they saw that a war would get rid of the unwanted elements.

You assume far too much. You would be better served by getting rid of those assumptions.
I think aliens would realize we're intelligent when they see our cities. The reason there probably won't be barbaric cultures in space is that since they're so advanced they probably have machines doing all their work and get unlimited resources from other planets that don't have life on them. Despite who you ask, wealth does not promote savagery. If a race wants to colonize us to add us to their empires, why would we refuse? We would get free technology for not really having to do anything.

And also I thought of something. If aliens wanted to destroy us for fun, they wouldn't need to attack us like an invasion. Somthing similar would happen if they wanted to add us to their empire. This being that could you imagine how much we would screw up getting all that new technology? Aliens trying to give us unlimited resource gathering machines and robots to make work obsolete? What would we do? That's right, mess it up. It would be the Cold War times 10. All the countries would start fearing all the others are going to get better weapons and attack for whatever reason, and some may do that to protect their borders against a threat that doesn't exist. Then there would be the people thinking the aliens are doing it for an evil purpose (but if they're doing it because they know we would kill each other, they would be right) and refuse the technology.
 

Kortney

New member
Nov 2, 2009
1,960
0
0
I believe that any race of creatures that could conquer the great distance between their planet and ours would be fairly logical beings and wouldn't be barbaric slaughterers like they are presented in movies. They'd have a bit of a peak at us, and there may be cases where they are violent if they were worried about their safety - or scared about our reaction, but I doubt they'd kill us all.
 

evileeyore

New member
Dec 7, 2009
3
0
0
oppp7 said:
4. Humans taste good. Try making soy human meat. It won't taste the same, but it won't kill people either.
And those two points make Soy Meat a lesser unpalatable alternative.

1 - It doesn't taste as good.
2 - It is less emotionally satisfying (nothing as fulfilling as knowing another creature has died to fill your belly. Mmm-mmm good).




Your trying to apply your rationales to aliens. Heck, I'm human and I don;t see anything wrong with whacking other humans for pretty "pointless" reasons.

Maybe we challenge their religious/philosophical beliefs by existing. Maybe their Deity of Choice has demanded it. Maybe it is a "prove your tough enough for the universe's schoolyard" thing. Maybe they're just bullies.


Or maybe we really taste that good.
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
I think the "tastes good" argument would be the one that won over.

You never know which part of your anatomy the hive beasts of the glorious Klackon empire will want to munch on.

I am betting its the kidneys, though.

edit: i figured it out. The aliens have just received transmissions of Will and Grace, and have departed to exterminate the source.
 

Zacharine

New member
Apr 17, 2009
2,854
0
0
oppp7 said:
I think aliens would realize we're intelligent when they see our cities.
Assuming they can differentiate purposeful, sentient behaviour from purposefult instinctual behaviour. After all, ants build nests that rival our cities in complexity. And assuming they can even differentiate between us and simple non-living lumps of organic matter.

The reason there probably won't be barbaric cultures in space is that since they're so advanced they probably have machines doing all their work and get unlimited resources from other planets that don't have life on them.
So many assumptions on that one.

1: That technological advancement equals or correlated to cultural advancement.

2. That they use ([semi]intelligent)machines to do their work. See Dune-verse. Even a modern day pocket calculator would be considered heretical and in violation of several empire-wide treaties to development of computer sciences.

3. Unlimited resources from planets/planetary objects without life present. Perhaps planets that support life are also the planets where it is the cheapest to extract resources: no need to supply expensive space-suits or haz-mat certified equipment if the planet you are strip-mining has benevolent weather conditions. Certainly, you could mine from someplace else, but it would be slower, more costly, require greater initial capital investment and perhaps the continued logistics would present problems as well.

Despite who you ask, wealth does not promote savagery. If a race wants to colonize us to add us to their empires, why would we refuse?
You assume the alien empire is benevolent. There are many reasons to reject such membership/colonization: Cultural reasons. Prospect of slavery. Religious reasons. Their policy towards us. The method of first contact. Perhaps coexistence is impossible due to differing biological makeup. Perhaps they do not even want to add us to their empire, but rather just want the planet and consider us pests to be exterminated.

See, for example, the Mycon from Star Control 2:

"The Mycon resemble fungi 0.5 to 3.5 m tall that thrive in hostile, volcanic environments created for themselves by implanting "Deep Children" (living terraforming devices) under the crust of a blue, life-bearing planet. The outcome is known as a "Shattered World" with significant crust destabilization and rivers of magma on the surface.

Mycon are hard to understand. A coherent Human-Mycon conversation appears to be an impossibility; Mycon ramblings seldom seem to attach any relevance to what's said to them even when they acknowledge the presence of others. They are lucid when presented with knowledge of a world ideal for their Deep Children.

A central concept to the race is Juffo-Wup, the hot light in the darkness, which is like a religion for the Mycon. Mycon live for it, and only for it. Juffo-Wup seems to be positive, connected to them or their spread. Related are the Non, what is not Juffo-Wup, and Void. All Non that doesn't become Juffo-Wup, must become Void. Juffo-Wup seems to refer to the Mycon and anything under their control, Non is other life and planets that the Mycon have not yet violently terraformed to their liking, and Void is anything else, such as space or dust."

Then there are Thirdspace aliens from Babylon 5. They categorize all life in three terms: Inconsequential, Food or Threat.

Inconsequential means destruction. Threat means destruction, albeit faster than Inconsequential. Food means consumption. Either way, if you happen to be not-them, they will kill you.

These are all possible examples of what alien life might be like. To exclude these options is to make an assumption.

We would get free technology for not really having to do anything.
You assume we would get the tech. You assume the tech would be sufficiently ahead of our current tech to be considered lucrative.

See Worldwar novels by Harry Turtledove. On average, the invading Race is pretty much at our current techonological level. The only reason they have the advantage in the series is that the invasion begins on May, 1942...

Not much tech to be had there, assuming instead of invasion they would have come in peace. Some better radios, perhaps slightly more compact radars, Jet-engine aircraft a decade earlier.

And also I thought of something. If aliens wanted to destroy us for fun, they wouldn't need to attack us like an invasion. Somthing similar would happen if they wanted to add us to their empire. This being that could you imagine how much we would screw up getting all that new technology? Aliens trying to give us unlimited resource gathering machines and robots to make work obsolete? What would we do? That's right, mess it up. It would be the Cold War times 10. All the countries would start fearing all the others are going to get better weapons and attack for whatever reason, and some may do that to protect their borders against a threat that doesn't exist. Then there would be the people thinking the aliens are doing it for an evil purpose (but if they're doing it because they know we would kill each other, they would be right) and refuse the technology.
Entirely possible. I've seen it done in a few stories. That is of course assuming they wouldn't just bombard us from the orbit with non-nuke weapons. But that would be assuming they have such weapons. And that they have such tech to give to humanity.

The point is, unless we begin to assume an awful lot about the aliens behind whatever invasion is threatening Earth this week, we cannot say if the invasion is useless or stupid or contrived.

Besides, stupid might still be believable. It's not like we humans act all rationally all the time ourselves and several plans both big and small throughout history have been put in place and executed on the basis of false information...
 

Inverse Skies

New member
Feb 3, 2009
3,630
0
0
Why wouldn't there be an alien invasion? Humanity is a remarkably self destructive species which because of our higher thinking allows us delusions of altruism when we're mainly motivated by selfish reasons. We've proved time and time again throughout our history that war is a means that we relate to one another as species. Partly it's due to evolution and natural competition of course, but if our planet goes the warring way that of course leaves the interpretation open that others might as well.

What have most wars been about? Security? Land? Religion? That last one seems to speak highly to me, because beings motivated by divine causes are very dangerous beings indeed, just look at the Halo series to understand that. I doubt an invasion would be necessary though, for as Dan Simmons touched upon in Hyperion, the logistical invasion of an entire planet would be ludicrously expensive and inhibitive. With the weapons we've managed to invent such as nuclear warheads I don't see why they would need to invade anyway if they needed us wiped out, surely any species with enough intelligence to cross the gulf of space must have a similar mastery of technology to us... unless they're the Zerg from Starcraft or something.
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
evileeyore said:
oppp7 said:
4. Humans taste good. Try making soy human meat. It won't taste the same, but it won't kill people either.
And those two points make Soy Meat a lesser unpalatable alternative.

1 - It doesn't taste as good.
2 - It is less emotionally satisfying (nothing as fulfilling as knowing another creature has died to fill your belly. Mmm-mmm good).




Your trying to apply your rationales to aliens. Heck, I'm human and I don;t see anything wrong with whacking other humans for pretty "pointless" reasons.

Maybe we challenge their religious/philosophical beliefs by existing. Maybe their Deity of Choice has demanded it. Maybe it is a "prove your tough enough for the universe's schoolyard" thing. Maybe they're just bullies.


Or maybe we really taste that good.
I doubt we taste any better than anything else. Soy meat probably can be perfected to the point that there is no difference. And the issue of killing an animal for the satisfaction of it feeding you is a problem because of the resources it takes (10x the energy for a pound of delicious veal to a pound of boring spinach, or something similar to it). I would hope that a alien race wouldn't let religion decide something that drastic. And I doubt an entire race would be able to get to advanced space travel if they were bullies and football players masocists.
 

oppp7

New member
Aug 29, 2009
7,045
0
0
SakSak said:
oppp7 said:
I think aliens would realize we're intelligent when they see our cities.
Assuming they can differentiate purposeful, sentient behaviour from purposefult instinctual behaviour. After all, ants build nests that rival our cities in complexity. And assuming they can even differentiate between us and simple non-living lumps of organic matter.

The reason there probably won't be barbaric cultures in space is that since they're so advanced they probably have machines doing all their work and get unlimited resources from other planets that don't have life on them.
So many assumptions on that one.

1: That technological advancement equals or correlated to cultural advancement.

2. That they use ([semi]intelligent)machines to do their work. See Dune-verse. Even a modern day pocket calculator would be considered heretical and in violation of several empire-wide treaties to development of computer sciences.

3. Unlimited resources from planets/planetary objects without life present. Perhaps planets that support life are also the planets where it is the cheapest to extract resources: no need to supply expensive space-suits or haz-mat certified equipment if the planet you are strip-mining has benevolent weather conditions. Certainly, you could mine from someplace else, but it would be slower, more costly, require greater initial capital investment and perhaps the continued logistics would present problems as well.

Despite who you ask, wealth does not promote savagery. If a race wants to colonize us to add us to their empires, why would we refuse?
You assume the alien empire is benevolent. There are many reasons to reject such membership/colonization: Cultural reasons. Prospect of slavery. Religious reasons. Their policy towards us. The method of first contact. Perhaps coexistence is impossible due to differing biological makeup. Perhaps they do not even want to add us to their empire, but rather just want the planet and consider us pests to be exterminated.

See, for example, the Mycon from Star Control 2:

"The Mycon resemble fungi 0.5 to 3.5 m tall that thrive in hostile, volcanic environments created for themselves by implanting "Deep Children" (living terraforming devices) under the crust of a blue, life-bearing planet. The outcome is known as a "Shattered World" with significant crust destabilization and rivers of magma on the surface.

Mycon are hard to understand. A coherent Human-Mycon conversation appears to be an impossibility; Mycon ramblings seldom seem to attach any relevance to what's said to them even when they acknowledge the presence of others. They are lucid when presented with knowledge of a world ideal for their Deep Children.

A central concept to the race is Juffo-Wup, the hot light in the darkness, which is like a religion for the Mycon. Mycon live for it, and only for it. Juffo-Wup seems to be positive, connected to them or their spread. Related are the Non, what is not Juffo-Wup, and Void. All Non that doesn't become Juffo-Wup, must become Void. Juffo-Wup seems to refer to the Mycon and anything under their control, Non is other life and planets that the Mycon have not yet violently terraformed to their liking, and Void is anything else, such as space or dust."

Then there are Thirdspace aliens from Babylon 5. They categorize all life in three terms: Inconsequential, Food or Threat.

Inconsequential means destruction. Threat means destruction, albeit faster than Inconsequential. Food means consumption. Either way, if you happen to be not-them, they will kill you.

These are all possible examples of what alien life might be like. To exclude these options is to make an assumption.

We would get free technology for not really having to do anything.
You assume we would get the tech. You assume the tech would be sufficiently ahead of our current tech to be considered lucrative.

See Worldwar novels by Harry Turtledove. On average, the invading Race is pretty much at our current techonological level. The only reason they have the advantage in the series is that the invasion begins on May, 1942...

Not much tech to be had there, assuming instead of invasion they would have come in peace. Some better radios, perhaps slightly more compact radars, Jet-engine aircraft a decade earlier.

And also I thought of something. If aliens wanted to destroy us for fun, they wouldn't need to attack us like an invasion. Somthing similar would happen if they wanted to add us to their empire. This being that could you imagine how much we would screw up getting all that new technology? Aliens trying to give us unlimited resource gathering machines and robots to make work obsolete? What would we do? That's right, mess it up. It would be the Cold War times 10. All the countries would start fearing all the others are going to get better weapons and attack for whatever reason, and some may do that to protect their borders against a threat that doesn't exist. Then there would be the people thinking the aliens are doing it for an evil purpose (but if they're doing it because they know we would kill each other, they would be right) and refuse the technology.
Entirely possible. I've seen it done in a few stories. That is of course assuming they wouldn't just bombard us from the orbit with non-nuke weapons. But that would be assuming they have such weapons. And that they have such tech to give to humanity.

The point is, unless we begin to assume an awful lot about the aliens behind whatever invasion is threatening Earth this week, we cannot say if the invasion is useless or stupid or contrived.

Besides, stupid might still be believable. It's not like we humans act all rationally all the time ourselves and several plans both big and small throughout history have been put in place and executed on the basis of false information...
Yes, technological advancement doesn't mean cultural advancement, but there are many ways to satisfy primal instincts without indulging them, and it would seem unlikely that an entire race would progress to the space stage without finding oune of them (examples include virtual reality, video games, robots to do the fighting amongst themselves, and crushing, depressing logic pointing out how pointless their aggression is). Also, they probably would have nuked themselves out of existence the moment their war-like race got nukes. Ants do not have more complex cities than us (please don't argue this), and if a race can't tell the difference between an advanced race and a bunch of monkeys when they went down to the planet and captured some, then they probably wouldn't have figured out space travel. Religious reasons for not using machines would be idiotic and I hope a space faring empire wouldn't use robots because it's against what some being that treats them like his own personal ant farm doesn't want. This also rules out cheaper mining because robots doing everything would make the economy obsolete. Cultural and religious reasons for objecting to this would be our fault. I don't think they would need slaves because they could just use robots that would be cheaper and more effective to use. As for being a different lifeform that uses different air/food/temperature/etc, there's plenty of ways to simulate that without starting wars and genocide. And if they wanted Earth, why not just terraform another planet? It probably isn't too hard, I mean, we may or may not (it wasn't too clear) have plans to melt the dry ice (CO2) on Mars to make a huge green house effect and get the temperatures stable. First contact can be screwed up, but that would probably be our fault and not too big of a deal. And even if their tech isn't much better than ours, it would still include faster than light travel, which would add hordes of science info to our knowledge. And I doubt misinformation or crazy actions would cause wars. But yes, we do assume a lot, but there's not a huge amount of reasons for us to forget about.