Would you buy a game that wasn't entertaining, if it was art?

Recommended Videos

Spectre39

New member
Oct 6, 2008
210
0
0
Hmmm. Well Bioshock was kind of an art game by your definition because it has an ideology behind it that enhanced the story. But if Bioshock didn't produce lots of fun killing the bad guys in neat ways then I would not play it just for the ideology.
 

xitel

Assume That I Hate You.
Aug 13, 2008
4,618
0
0
Well, if you ask me, in order to be art a game has to also be entertaining.
 

Silver

New member
Jun 17, 2008
1,142
0
0
sv93 said:
Hunde Des Krieg said:
Bored Tomatoe said:
No, I would not.
Seconded
Thirded, if a game looks good and plays like crap what is the point of playing it? Why not just watch some videos of it on the Internet?
Since when was art purely about looks? A video game that was to be considered art would have to have that very art incorporeated into the gameplay. I know Flow or whatever the name was called itself art, purely based on looks, but I wouldn't agree, that's like making a movie of still pictures without sound and calling it art. It should encompass the entire medium, and the games medium is about player input, about gameplay. That gameplay has to be a part of the artsy experience, as well as visuals and audio for a game to be truly considered art. Sort of like Myst.
 

Librarian Mike

New member
May 16, 2008
625
0
0
I bought Ico a while back and while it was beautiful to look at, I could only get about an hour into it before I turned it off in disgust. Eventually, I'd get to a point where those shadow creatures would appear and the girl would walk straight towards them...oh, and I only had a stick to fight them with. The puzzles were neat, but I'd rather play Prince of Persia because at least the NPC has an attention span.
 

FireFly90

New member
Sep 14, 2008
283
0
0
No one has metioned 'Heavy Rain' yet, i think its quite artistic in a sence. What do the rest of you think, entertaiment or art?
 

Hyoscine

New member
Dec 11, 2008
111
0
0
Silent Hill two is pretty much my favourite thing ever, in any medium. It's a story of a man trying to come to terms with a bereavement so personally devastating that he's incapable of comprehending the depths of his own loss. His guilt and loneliness are palpable in the landscape he condemns himself to, over and over again.

The game is unrelentingly unhappy, but also incredibly beautiful, and I've lost count of the number of times I've played it through. The ebb and flow of place and memory that both drowns and comforts the protagonist too moving for words. So I keep going back for more.
 

CoverYourHead

High Priest of C'Thulhu
Dec 7, 2008
2,514
0
0
No and for this reason: You do not have to play a movie. In a movie, you just watch, can get bored, but still appreciate the art part of it. In a game, if it's not fun you're not motivated and lose a connection with the protagonist and that connection is an important part of a games appeal as art.
 

Silver

New member
Jun 17, 2008
1,142
0
0
-Zen- said:
I would not. Just like I wouldn't buy a dull book just because the font's pretty.
But you'd read a thought-provoking book even if it wasn't fun, wouldn't you?

What about a thought-provoking, gorgeous game that has gameplay (admittedly boring) unlike anything you've seen before?
 

Hyoscine

New member
Dec 11, 2008
111
0
0
-Zen- said:
I would not. Just like I wouldn't buy a dull book just because the font's pretty.
We're talking about art, not aesthetics. Good books with ugly fonts.