moretimethansense said:
thethingthatlurks said:
moretimethansense said:
thethingthatlurks said:
moretimethansense said:
thethingthatlurks said:
moretimethansense said:
Sorry but going Vegan is actually pretty bad for you, the health benefits (if there are any) are probebly offset by the fact that we kind of need protiens and fats to survive, or at least stay healthy, I'm not gonna tell a vegan to "eat a fucking burger" but if your diet requires you at any point to take supplements or count out the protien level in the nuts you just ate, something is not right there.
Uhm, that's a load of crap. Soy protein is complete, so you can live on that. Plus beans, grains, nuts, etc contain all the nutrients you need. A vegan diet can be perfectly healthy, but requires bit of planning.
To get soy protein you have to extract it though don't you?
Not really something you'd find in a natural diet, and as I said without that planning you'd be pretty much fucked, at any rate if you wajt to do it then fine, I'm not gonna stop you, but it still isn't a natural diet by any means.
Load of crap part 2:
Soy are a type of beans, ergo each bean contains all necessary amino acids. You could eat them raw (if you have a grudge against your teeth), and still get all of those goody-goody nutrients. It is 100% natural, although speaking as a chemist I find the assertion that something is "unnatural" rather hilarious. No extractions are necessary, although if you do first grind them up, add water, mush it up, and then magnesium chloride or calcium sulfate, you get tofu. Hmm, tofu... Anyway, I guess that's the extraction you were referring to.
Basicly yeah, though I may not have made myself clear, I never meant to say that something being unnatural (By which I mean not found in this state in nature) was bad, simply that it wasn't natural, bread is not technicly natural, unless I've been lied to and they in fact sprout from bushes, it's just that many (though by no means all) vegans claim that a vegan diet is somehow more natural and healthy than a standard meat eating diet, which is a ridiculess assertation, particularly since if not for various modern conviniences a vegan diet would likely rtesult in sever health problems if not death.
A vegan diet is as natural as any other. Or do you know of any other animals who rely on heat to render meat safe to eat? Stating that one's diet is "more natural" than another is retarded...
It's a funny point, as raising animals is more costly than farming vegetables. Given the growth of the human population, meat might be getting so expensive that the only feasible option would be to maintain a vegetarian/vegan diet. Even with all of our modern technology, we simply cannot solve the problem of getting cows (or other animals) to grow muscles while consuming nothing but waste products...
Our diet requres mechanical interferance to work, that's pretty fucking unnatural if you ask me, but in short you could maintain a meat eating diet if humans had never developed civilisation, you simply couldn't maintain a vegan diet in nature, unless of course you lived in exactly the right part of the world that you could get protien rich plants year round by simply forraging.
And for the love of god!
Would you stop acting as though I was insulting veganism, I simplyy said in a naturat enviroment a vegan diet would. not. work.
As for needing to cook meat, that's generations of civilaisation for you, we used to be able to eat raw meat without the inevitable food poisoning.
That's just it, your point is stupid! I could always gather fruits/nuts/veggies etc, and it would be a 100% natural diet by any standards. Yes, I could even forgo technology, anything, even a bloody stick. I would still be getting enough nutrients to survive.
How would you repeat that for an omnivore diet? Strangle your prey of choice with your bare hands? Try to milk cows? Gather eggs from nesting birds (which would be fertilized, yummy)? Sorry, but humans would be completely incapable of surviving on your hypothetical "natural" diet.
Also, cooking food destroys parasites, not just bacteria. It's a hell of a lot easier to develop immunity against a bacterium than it is against something like this lovely fella: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taenia_saginata
Trust me, there has never been a time in the history of this planet where one species could consume anything without the risk of foodborne disease. Immunity against all possible threats simply doesn't exist.