Would you support a cure for homosexuality and transexualism?

Recommended Videos

ThreeName

New member
May 8, 2013
459
0
0
Yeah, I'd support it. Personal freedom to do what you want with yourself and shit.

Honestly, all this feels in this thread. Get over yourselves and let people do what they (hypothetically) want.
 

Sir Pootis

New member
Aug 4, 2012
240
0
0
I would not support it, despite being currently closeted to my family/friends, because I am as I am and I don't want the be changed, and the idea of completely changing someone's personality as though it were simply like getting plastic surgery for a wrinkle is kind of sickening.
 

Hoplon

Jabbering Fool
Mar 31, 2010
1,839
0
0
You can't cure something that's not an illness.

That said, there might be a cure for transsexualism, full gender migration. We know it's possible in nature to migrate from one to the other, engineering it might be possible in humans.
 

SushiJaguar

New member
Sep 12, 2010
130
0
0
I'd definitely be behind something like this. If it does turn out at some point in the future that anything except heterosexuality is just a genetetic (or whatever else) defect, then I'm all for fixing that shit up. I mean, part of the reason incest is such a bad idea is that it causes genetic problems down the line, doesn't it? Otherwise I wouldn't have a problem with it.

As it stands though, I'd rather they cure all the mental issues first, like all the autism spectrum disorders. In this day and age I face less flak for being bisexual than I do for having Asperger's. It's still considered perfectly fine to discriminate against the spacky retards after all. No special laws against it.
 

J Tyran

New member
Dec 15, 2011
2,407
0
0
Cure is a pretty loaded way of putting it, if a method for someone to change their sexuality or gender identity that adults could choose to have it would be up to them. I wouldn't disagree with that, it would have to be their own choice though and not something parents should be able to force upon kids or anything.
 

Lead Herring

New member
Mar 14, 2011
53
0
0
Sounds like a waste of tax payers money to me. It's not like we need more fertile couples, and as for not having to grow up in a world that's biased against you, this could also be achieved through working toward a more tolerant society.
 

SushiJaguar

New member
Sep 12, 2010
130
0
0
As a side note: God DAMN there are a lot of people in this thread who have no clue what transgender/sexualism is...
 

K12

New member
Dec 28, 2012
943
0
0
...why would anybody support a "cure" for something like this?

Seriously why use the word "cure" at all. It should be very obvious that that kind of language would give horrible implications. You wouldn't be solving anything by heterofying gay people, you'd just be making the world less diverse, which would be a bad thing on its own.

Aside from that the only thing that could ever eradicate somebodies homosexual tendencies completely would have to eradicate all their sexual feelings.
 

Caiphus

Social Office Corridor
Mar 31, 2010
1,181
0
0
chikusho said:
Would you support a cure for liking pancakes?
Actually, a way to reduce the addictiveness of sugar might be useful.

Edit: really wasn't trying to be a smartass there. Your post just made me think about that.
 

chadachada123

New member
Jan 17, 2011
2,310
0
0
I'll treat this like I would a "if you had a button that would eliminate race, would you press it" hypothetical.

Yeah, I'd press it. Not because I think that there's anything wrong with homosexuality or transexuality, but because it would speed up the whole "let's just get along" thing if we had one less difference to divide us.

(Plus, I'm still not convinced that sexuality even EXISTS, and believe that most of us would be bisexual if we were raised in a cultural-less society).

Transexuality is a bit like anorexia to me (the mental part, not the "not eating to make the mental part feel better" part), in that your mind is telling you something that your body just doesn't agree with. I obviously would want to get rid of it so that people feel like they're made for their bodies and not like they were born into the wrong one.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
Silvanus said:
If a "cure" were introduced now, even a voluntary one, we'd see a huge number of people under immense social pressure to get it. It wouldn't be a free choice for many. Their parents, their peers, their Churches would make them, or make them feel guilty. Hell, even some of those without those social pressures bearing down on them may get it in a bout of depression, and deeply regret it.

Then, those who didn't want it would be ostracised even further.


...I can imagine, however, a distant future in which such social pressures were minimal/ nonexistant. In such a future, I could see the benefits in this being available, but only voluntarily, and only with requisite counselling to prevent rash decisionmaking. In that future, I'd be equally in favour of a voluntary injection to make somebody gay, and with the same restrictions. But social attitudes need to be unrecognisable before I'd see that situation as morally viable.
You act as if there's not any social pressure on homosexuals now. Homosexuality is actually a crime in a lot of countries and even in our so called tolerant world we're quite intolerant towards homosexuals.

There are lots of people abused and bullied because they are homosexual. People commit suicide over this, people are excluded from their community and I've seen a girl who killed her grandparents after a long period of abuse. There's straight camps which is basically abuse camps. People get treated with electroshocks as if that does anything good. There are too many who are ashamed of who they are today even without a cure. A cure might shift the balance a little towards the intolerant side, but at least there would be a way out other than faking heterosexuality, suicide or murder.

Being gay isn't immoral, it isn't a crime, it isn't a disease and I don't think it's against nature in any way. It is however a source for a whole lot of abuse. Would a cure really be that bad? I would prefer if we could just be tolerant towards people no matter their preference though.

Now seeing the OP was talking about a vaccine rather than a cure I don't think that would be that much better. It puts a lot of pressure on the mother and it puts all the blame on the mother. It also removes the option completely from the person whose life we change even if the option was just an illusion as it was in he case of the cure.
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
Johnny Novgorod said:
Why would you compare homosexuality to paedophilia? I await your response.
Because they're both sexual preferences that cannot be chosen. Your move.
Harrowdown said:
Gay people don't rape kids. I fail to see your point.
I fail to see your point, paedophilia is not the same as child molestation because the latter is a choice that they make. Would you associated that Heterosexuals rape? No.
 

Mr F.

New member
Jul 11, 2012
614
0
0
I am disappoint!

7 pages and the latest is not incoherent homophobic/transphobic rage. I am also slightly amazed.

Has the escapist moved on? Have we matured?

OT: No, Hell to the no. Only things that need to be cured should be cured. The LGBTQ community does not need to be cured. The society that victimises them needs to be cured. The fact that someones sexuality is seen to be an issue needs to be fixed.

SushiJaguar said:
As a side note: God DAMN there are a lot of people in this thread who have no clue what transgender/sexualism is...
Yeah, you sorta get used to that. Gotta remember, in the words of some twat a few days ago

"A MTF Transgendered person is just a man with a mutilated penis."
 

Ryan Minns

New member
Mar 29, 2011
308
0
0
A mate of mine and I had a talk about this. He said if they found the "gay gene" he'd support methods that prevent it from being passed on but NEVER removed from those already alive. I was against it because if it happened history books would become a warning of the "horrible plague" of homosexuality that finally got stomped out which will make other peoples personal lives looked at as yet another "plague" because they're different to others.
 

lunavixen

New member
Jan 2, 2012
841
0
0
Definitely not, as I will never think of homosexuality or transexuality as diseases (which as such would "need" a cure), It's a very natural part of life and is a part of what gives us diversity. It's not an exclusively human thing either, so, no.