Actually, a way to reduce the addictiveness of sugar might be useful.chikusho said:Would you support a cure for liking pancakes?
You act as if there's not any social pressure on homosexuals now. Homosexuality is actually a crime in a lot of countries and even in our so called tolerant world we're quite intolerant towards homosexuals.Silvanus said:If a "cure" were introduced now, even a voluntary one, we'd see a huge number of people under immense social pressure to get it. It wouldn't be a free choice for many. Their parents, their peers, their Churches would make them, or make them feel guilty. Hell, even some of those without those social pressures bearing down on them may get it in a bout of depression, and deeply regret it.
Then, those who didn't want it would be ostracised even further.
...I can imagine, however, a distant future in which such social pressures were minimal/ nonexistant. In such a future, I could see the benefits in this being available, but only voluntarily, and only with requisite counselling to prevent rash decisionmaking. In that future, I'd be equally in favour of a voluntary injection to make somebody gay, and with the same restrictions. But social attitudes need to be unrecognisable before I'd see that situation as morally viable.
Because they're both sexual preferences that cannot be chosen. Your move.Johnny Novgorod said:Why would you compare homosexuality to paedophilia? I await your response.
I fail to see your point, paedophilia is not the same as child molestation because the latter is a choice that they make. Would you associated that Heterosexuals rape? No.Harrowdown said:Gay people don't rape kids. I fail to see your point.
Yeah, you sorta get used to that. Gotta remember, in the words of some twat a few days agoSushiJaguar said:As a side note: God DAMN there are a lot of people in this thread who have no clue what transgender/sexualism is...