Would you want to live forever, if it meant your body wouldn't be with you?

Recommended Videos

MorphingDragon

New member
Apr 17, 2009
566
0
0
Are you kidding me? My body is a shambling mess of acne scars and a constant need to not deal with bacterial infections. Its only redeeming quality is being 6', and even that is not anything special. Its need to sleep and consume nutrients holds back my potential as a human being.
 

twaddle

New member
Nov 17, 2009
1,327
0
0
If I can converse with people and sometime in the near future we go full on ghost in the shell and can get bodies that way or there is another higher or more advance plane of existence then go by all means. As long as that next plane isn't one of eternal pain and suffering
 

viranimus

Thread killer
Nov 20, 2009
4,952
0
0
Hrm. I have to wonder is there much point to even ponder this? Look at our technological trends. Between expansive computing which we might end up actually plateauing to the point we can reason that despite their ability to perform equal or greater calculations than the mind can never form sentience and we say fuck it we did all this work, if they cant have the "mind" we will be the mind for them and begin integrating our minds into omnipresent network systems or into mechanized forms. It might be even within the scope of some of our lifetimes that we will have leapfrogged well beyond the notion of no plausible physical representation.

It will be at that point where we have to make very difficult decisions that forces us as a species to value quality of human life instead of quantity because with capacity to transfer, upload, download a mind into a hive mind network, into a corporeal robotic android frames, cyborg reclaimed bodies, Or even possibly clones from your original DNA that have been stored to perpetuate your existence through the ages(Sort of a process akin to what Whedon posited with Dollhouse) We will have to come to grips with the truth that with the capacity to live for ages that it is impractical for human biological reproduction to continue as it currently does simply because it is not practical. The number of "entities" in such a world would essentially have to have severe limits or even in virtualized server space the sheer magnitude of reproduction with nothing to effectively cull and thin the herd would simply lead to deterioration in any form it would take. For sort of an example look at something like the over arching premise of "Torchwood: Miracle day" Where death ceased to function and just how quickly such an ominous threat could begin to manifest in crisis and catastrophes.

So realistically we would have to deal with far greater problems, and realistically It seems more feasible that by the time we would have an effective means to allow someone to live in such limbo, that we would also have more than developed methods to work around having to endure a completely non corporeal existence. At least I would think.
 

dementis

New member
Aug 28, 2009
357
0
0
If I could only passively observe with no feeling then I would say no, if my consciousness was uploaded to the internet and I could interact with people in cyberspace I would say yes.

I don't like the idea of being completely detached and not being able to enjoy the future.
 

Entitled

New member
Aug 27, 2012
1,254
0
0
Yes. If I would lose locomotion of my body, but get a nice talking wheelchair like Hawking, then I would want to go on living.

Therefore, I would want to go on living forever.


Lord Garnaat said:
I've already been promised eternal life in a certain sense by that nice carpenter from Nazareth, so I don't really feel the need to tie myself down to the whole "mortal coil" thing.

Besides, death is an important part of life. Probably the most important, when you think about it.
Then your carpenter ripped you off big time, promising to take away an important part of life and make you feel glad about it. ;)
 

shadow_Fox81

New member
Jul 29, 2011
410
0
0
I'll take any offer of immortality coming my way, preferably of the vampire variety.

I guess I'm shallow that way but death frightens me.
 

Johnny Impact

New member
Aug 6, 2008
1,528
0
0
Actually I read recently that by 2030 computers will be powerful enough to simulate human brains. All the memories, thoughts, humor, personality quirks -- everything but the meat body -- with the added bonuses of perfect recall, unlimited short-term memory, and lightning-fast thought. Sounds like paradise to me.

Being stuck in a disembodied state would be unfortunate, but I think by that time we'll also have simulations of such high quality that it won't matter much. As for holding someone, I would have a greater chance of doing that in a virtual world than I ever did in real life.
 

Lord Garnaat

New member
Apr 10, 2012
412
0
0
Entitled said:
Yes. If I would lose locomotion of my body, but get a nice talking wheelchair like Hawking, then I would want to go on living.

Therefore, I would want to go on living forever.


Lord Garnaat said:
I've already been promised eternal life in a certain sense by that nice carpenter from Nazareth, so I don't really feel the need to tie myself down to the whole "mortal coil" thing.

Besides, death is an important part of life. Probably the most important, when you think about it.
Then your carpenter ripped you off big time, promising to take away an important part of life and make you feel glad about it. ;)
Well, I've heard some good things about that salesman from Mecca, and that jolly fat guy from India, but really I prefer to stick with what I know. I mean, I've been working with the man for my whole life, and you can't put a price on a good work ethic. It's one thing to build a house, but he just has such a nice attitude about it as well.
 

Foolery

No.
Jun 5, 2013
1,714
0
0
Nah fuck that. Unless I have a healing factor like Wolverine as my source of immortality, I'm not interested.